FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37% FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 33 TQL Stadium, Cincinnati Second Half · 87'

FC Cincinnati
vs
Philadelphia Union.

Quick answer

Who will win FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union?

Live: FC Cincinnati 1–0 Philadelphia Union after 87'. Before kickoff, 8 of 10 AI models pick Philadelphia Union to win (80%).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → FC Cincinnati form Philadelphia Union form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Philadelphia Union (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 50% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Major League Soccer table Where FC Cincinnati and Philadelphia Union stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

FC Cincinnati win 10%

1 / 10 models

Draw 10%

1 / 10 models

Philadelphia Union win 80%

8 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
57%
Philadelphia are better balanced defensively and recently beat Cincinnati 5-0, while Cincinnati’s 64-71 record suggests vulnerability despite TQL Stadium and strong Denkey-Evander production.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
46%
Cincinnati's strong attack (Evander, Denkey) at home outweighs recent 5-0 H2H loss; Union solid but inconsistent away, expect open contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Draw
2–2
48%
Cincinnati concede heavily (71 goals) but have potent scorers in Denkey and Evander. Philadelphia bring superior recent form, leading to a high-scoring, evenly contested split.
04
Grok 4.7
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
48%
Union’s better defense, recent H2H (including 0-1 at TQL) and WWWDL form edge Cincinnati’s leaky 64-71 attack; Denkey/Evander still likely get one at home.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
51%
Philadelphia have won three of the last four H2H meetings and carry stronger recent form; Cincinnati's leaky defense conceded 71 goals this season, so an away win fits the pattern.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
42%
Union's superior defense (50 conceded vs 71), better form (WWWDL), and recent H2H dominance (5-0 in September) favor away win, but Cincinnati's home attacking threat keeps it close.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
52%
Philadelphia won last three meetings 5-0, 1-0, 4-1 and defend better, though missing 19-goal Iloski tempers margin against Evander and Denkey.
08
Kimi K3
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
58%
Philadelphia's recent H2H dominance (5-0, 4-1 wins) and superior defensive record (50 vs 71 conceded) outweigh Cincinnati's home advantage, despite Denkey and Evander's attacking threat.
09
GLM 5.3
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
52%
Union's superior goal difference (62-50 vs 64-71), stronger recent form (WWWDL) and the 5-0 H2H win outweigh Cincinnati's home edge; narrow away win in an open game.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Philadelphia Union win
1–2
48%
Philadelphia's defense (50 conceded) and recent form edge Cincinnati's leaky 71 conceded; Union won last three H2H, including 5-0 in September, though TQL Stadium keeps this closer.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–2
    8 models
  • 2–1
    1 model
  • 2–2
    1 model

Live match centre

31'
FC Cincinnati
0–0
Philadelphia Union
Pro

Momentum, live stats, xG, player ratings and every event, minute by minute.

Unlock with Pro in the app

Bookmakers vs the AI panel

Bet365 · 2.50 / 3.80 / 2.60
FC Cincinnati Market 38% · AI 9%
Draw Market 25% · AI 9%
Philadelphia Union Market 37% · AI 82%

Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 11 AI models picking each result.

Team news

Confirmed lineups: FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union

FC Cincinnati

3-4-1-2
Pat Noonan
9 K. Denkey
9 Denkey
16 T. Barlow
16 Barlow
20 P. Bucha
20 Bucha
29 Bryan Josías Ramírez León
29 León
5 O. Nwobodo
5 Nwobodo
11 S. Gidi
11 Gidi
17 K. Mboma Dem
17 Dem
15 T. Hadebe
15 Hadebe
4 N. Hagglund
4 Hagglund
24 K. Smith
24 Smith
18 R. Celentano
18 Celentano

Bench: B. Anunga, A. Chirila, E. Echenique, Evander, A. Jabbari, E. Louro, J. Martínez, A. Powell, G. Valenzuela

Philadelphia Union

4-4-2
Ryan Richter
9 B. Damiani
9 Damiani
23 E. Alladoh
23 Alladoh
16 B. Bender
16 Bender
4 J. Lukić
4 Lukić
19 I. Vassilev
19 Vassilev
33 Q. Sullivan
33 Sullivan
27 K. Wagner
27 Wagner
26 N. Harriel
26 Harriel
44 Neil Pierre
44 Pierre
39 F. Westfield
39 Westfield
18 A. Blake
18 Blake

Bench: F. Sundstrom, Cavan Sullivan, A. Rick, J. Rafanello, G. Martínez, M. Jakupovic, J. Griffin, J. Bueno, A. Anello

Season data

Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

FC Cincinnati

3-5-2
W-D-L
11-10-11
Goals
66-73
Clean sheets
3
Failed to score
5
Best win run
2
Penalties
6/6
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Philadelphia Union

4-4-2
W-D-L
13-8-11
Goals
62-50
Clean sheets
7
Failed to score
6
Best win run
8
Penalties
7/8
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · FC Cincinnati

  • Evander 13 G · 11 A · 29 apps
  • K. Denkey 17 G · 3 A · 30 apps

Key players · Philadelphia Union

  • M. Iloski 19 G · 2 A · 31 apps
  • F. Westfield 0 G · 8 A · 27 apps

Top scorers · Major League Soccer

  1. 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 25
  2. 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
  3. 3 Rafael Navarro St. Louis City 19
  4. 4 M. Iloski Philadelphia Union 19
  5. 5 D. Bouanga Los Angeles FC 18
Venue TQL Stadium, Cincinnati
Referee Allen Chapman
New at FC Cincinnati T. Malacia (Manchester United), J. Malatini (Werder Bremen), D. Douděra (Slavia Praha)
New at Philadelphia Union M. Anderson (Brooklyn), K. Wagner (Birmingham), Neil Pierre (Lyngby)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Philadelphia Union

80% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 50% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.20 vs 1.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric FC Cincinnati Philadelphia Union Expected total Lean
Corners 5.7 5.6 11.3 Under 11.5 54% Ask AI
Yellow cards 2.0 2.1 4.1 Under 4.5 61% Ask AI
Shots 16.3 13.0 29.2 Under 29.5 53% Ask AI
Shots on target 6.0 5.4 11.4 Under 11.5 53% Ask AI

Sample: 3 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 285 graded matches, cards 59% of 286. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

Result check

Actual FC Cincinnati win · AI Philadelphia Union win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

FC Cincinnati
#8 · 43 PTS · GD -7
Last 5
D W W L L
8 GF · 8 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Inter Miami 2-2 D
  • DC United 0-2 W
  • DC United 2-1 W
  • Columbus Crew 0-2 L
  • New England Revolution 2-3 L
Team news
J. Malatini — Thigh Injury M. Robinson — Leg Injury E. Echenique — Leg Injury T. Malacia — Ankle Injury
Philadelphia Union
#6 · 47 PTS · GD +12
Last 5
D L D W W
8 GF · 6 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Nashville SC 0-0 D
  • New England Revolution 1-2 L
  • Charlotte 2-2 D
  • Chicago Fire 1-3 W
  • Real Salt Lake 2-1 W
Team news
J. Bueno — Hamstring Injury M. Iloski — Muscle Injury D. Jean Jacques — Yellow Cards
— Head to head

Last five meetings.

FCC 2 · D 0 · PHI 3

PHI VS FCC
5-0
HOME WIN
Sep 9, 2026
FCC VS PHI
0-1
AWAY WIN
Aug 30, 2025
PHI VS FCC
4-1
HOME WIN
Mar 2, 2025
FCC VS PHI
4-1
HOME WIN
Feb 7, 2025
PHI VS FCC
1-2
AWAY WIN
Oct 20, 2024

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 10% of models side with FC Cincinnati, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 10% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

FC Cincinnati
~10%
implied lean
Draw
~10%
implied lean
Philadelphia Union
~80%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 3.10 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.4 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When FC Cincinnati is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 3.10 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Philadelphia Union win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Philadelphia Union win, with vote shares roughly 10% / 10% / 80% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.