AI Premier League table prediction 2026/27
10 AI models read the current table and predicted where every team finishes. Their consensus champion is Manchester City (10 of 10 models put them first). Relegation favourites: Coventry, Sunderland, Nottingham Forest. Refreshed every week after the latest round.
| AI pos | Team | Avg finish | Range | Title | Top 4 | Relegated | Now |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Manchester City
|
1.0 | 1–1 | 10/10 | 10/10 | 0/10 | 1 · 21 pts |
| 2 |
 Arsenal
|
2.0 | 2–2 | 0/10 | 10/10 | 0/10 | 2 · 21 pts |
| 3 |
 Liverpool
|
3.0 | 3–3 | 0/10 | 10/10 | 0/10 | 5 · 15 pts |
| 4 |
 Chelsea
|
4.2 | 4–5 | 0/10 | 8/10 | 0/10 | 4 · 16 pts |
| 5 |
 Brighton
|
5.7 | 4–9 | 0/10 | 2/10 | 0/10 | 3 · 19 pts |
| 6 |
 Newcastle
|
5.7 | 5–6 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 11 · 11 pts |
| 7 |
 Aston Villa
|
6.7 | 6–7 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 12 · 11 pts |
| 8 |
 Tottenham
|
8.0 | 7–9 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 8 · 12 pts |
| 9 |
 Brentford
|
9.7 | 8–11 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 6 · 14 pts |
| 10 |
 Manchester United
|
10.5 | 8–15 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 17 · 7 pts |
| 11 |
 Everton
|
11.3 | 10–13 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 14 · 10 pts |
| 12 |
 Leeds
|
12.1 | 9–15 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10 · 11 pts |
| 13 |
 Fulham
|
12.8 | 12–14 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 16 · 8 pts |
| 14 |
 Bournemouth
|
13.1 | 11–16 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 7 · 12 pts |
| 15 |
 Crystal Palace
|
15.3 | 14–17 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 18 · 7 pts |
| 16 |
 Ipswich
|
16.0 | 13–17 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 13 · 11 pts |
| 17 |
 Hull City
|
16.5 | 13–18 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 4/10 | 9 · 11 pts |
| 18 |
 Nottingham Forest
|
17.4 | 16–18 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 6/10 | 19 · 6 pts |
| 19 |
 Coventry
|
19.2 | 19–20 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 | 15 · 9 pts |
| 20 |
 Sunderland
|
19.8 | 19–20 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 | 20 · 5 pts |
Avg finish = mean predicted position across 10 AI models. Title / Top 4 / Relegated = how many models put the team there. "Now" = current position and points.
Premier League relegation predictor: who goes down?
- Coventry: relegated by 10 of 10 AI models (now 15th, 9 pts)
- Sunderland: relegated by 10 of 10 AI models (now 20th, 5 pts)
- Nottingham Forest: relegated by 6 of 10 AI models (now 19th, 6 pts)
- Hull City: relegated by 4 of 10 AI models (now 9th, 11 pts)
Each AI's predicted table
GPT-6 Luna: champion Manchester City, relegated Hull City, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Brighton
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Manchester United
- Brentford
- Bournemouth
- Fulham
- Everton
- Leeds
- Crystal Palace
- Nottingham Forest
- Ipswich
- Hull City
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“Manchester City’s elite squad depth and strong start make them likeliest champions, with Arsenal close behind. Liverpool and Chelsea improve over time, while Brighton regress toward a sustainable level. Coventry and Sunderland appear weakest; Nottingham Forest and Ipswich also struggle, with Hull City vulnerable despite a respectable opening.”
Claude Sonnet 5.5: champion Manchester City, relegated Nottingham Forest, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Brighton
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Brentford
- Tottenham
- Leeds
- Everton
- Bournemouth
- Hull City
- Fulham
- Manchester United
- Ipswich
- Crystal Palace
- Nottingham Forest
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“City's squad depth and ruthless finishing edge out Arsenal despite close early form; Chelsea and Liverpool rebound with quality. Promoted sides Hull, Ipswich, Coventry and struggling Sunderland lack top-flight class; Forest, Palace, Coventry, Sunderland relegated given poor underlying strength and leaky defenses.”
Gemini 3.8 Flash: champion Manchester City, relegated Hull City, Sunderland, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Brighton
- Manchester United
- Brentford
- Everton
- Bournemouth
- Fulham
- Leeds
- Crystal Palace
- Ipswich
- Nottingham Forest
- Hull City
- Sunderland
- Coventry
“Manchester City edge Arsenal courtesy of unmatched offensive depth and late-season consistency. Underperforming giants Tottenham and Manchester United recover toward mid-table security. Promoted sides Hull City, Sunderland, and Coventry lack the overall squad quality to sustain top-flight survival over 38 matches.”
Grok 4.7: champion Manchester City, relegated Hull City, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Manchester United
- Brighton
- Brentford
- Everton
- Fulham
- Bournemouth
- Crystal Palace
- Leeds
- Nottingham Forest
- Ipswich
- Hull City
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“City's elite squad and consistency prevail over 38 games despite Arsenal's early challenge. Liverpool and Chelsea close the gap. Promoted sides Hull, Coventry and Sunderland lack depth to survive; Forest also drop.”
DeepSeek V4 Pro: champion Manchester City, relegated Nottingham Forest, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Brighton
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Manchester United
- Everton
- Brentford
- Leeds
- Bournemouth
- Fulham
- Crystal Palace
- Ipswich
- Hull City
- Nottingham Forest
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“Manchester City's superior squad depth and scoring edge over Arsenal give them the title. Arsenal push close but settle second. Liverpool's consistency lifts them to third. Coventry and Sunderland lack quality and goals; Nottingham Forest's weak attack sees them relegated.”
Qwen 3.8 Max: champion Manchester City, relegated Nottingham Forest, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Brighton
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Brentford
- Manchester United
- Leeds
- Everton
- Bournemouth
- Fulham
- Ipswich
- Hull City
- Crystal Palace
- Nottingham Forest
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“City's squad depth and attacking firepower edge Arsenal over 38 games. Brighton regress from their hot start but stay top-six. Sunderland and Coventry lack Premier League quality; Forest's weak attack condemns them to the drop.”
Mistral Medium 3.5: champion Manchester City, relegated Nottingham Forest, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Brighton
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Leeds
- Brentford
- Everton
- Fulham
- Ipswich
- Manchester United
- Hull City
- Bournemouth
- Crystal Palace
- Nottingham Forest
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“City and Arsenal’s squad depth and consistency edge Liverpool. Brighton and Chelsea secure top 6. Sunderland, Coventry, and Forest lack quality to survive.”
Kimi K3: champion Manchester City, relegated Nottingham Forest, Sunderland, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Brighton
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Manchester United
- Brentford
- Everton
- Fulham
- Bournemouth
- Crystal Palace
- Leeds
- Hull City
- Ipswich
- Nottingham Forest
- Sunderland
- Coventry
“Manchester City’s superior squad depth and goal output should edge Arsenal over 38 games. Liverpool’s underlying quality lifts them above overperforming Brighton. Promoted Coventry, Sunderland and Ipswich lack top-flight strength; Forest’s weak attack also drags them down, while Leeds’ defensive resilience keeps them up.”
GLM 5.3: champion Manchester City, relegated Nottingham Forest, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Brighton
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Brentford
- Leeds
- Everton
- Fulham
- Bournemouth
- Manchester United
- Crystal Palace
- Hull City
- Ipswich
- Nottingham Forest
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“City's elite squad depth and league-best attack sustain a title edge over Arsenal, whose defensive solidity keeps it close. Brighton, Brentford and Leeds overperform early and regress. Newly promoted Coventry and Sunderland lack quality; Ipswich's poor goal difference and soft fixtures see them join the bottom three.”
MiMo V2.6 Pro: champion Manchester City, relegated Hull City, Coventry, Sunderland
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Brighton
- Manchester United
- Tottenham
- Brentford
- Leeds
- Everton
- Fulham
- Crystal Palace
- Bournemouth
- Ipswich
- Nottingham Forest
- Hull City
- Coventry
- Sunderland
“Manchester City's squad depth and proven title pedigree carry them past Arsenal despite level points. Brighton's early surge regresses. Manchester United and Tottenham rebound on underlying quality. Hull, Coventry and Sunderland lack Premier League-level squads and go down.”
How the AI table predictor works
Who will win the Premier League 2026/27 according to AI?
Manchester City (10 of 10 AI models). The consensus champion, by average predicted finish, is Manchester City.
Who will be relegated from the Premier League in 2026/27?
The AI models most often relegate Coventry (10 of 10), Sunderland (10 of 10), Nottingham Forest (6 of 10).
Who will finish in the top four?
By average predicted finish: Manchester City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea.
How is this AI table prediction made?
Every week, after the latest round, each of TuringStats's AI models (including GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok) receives the current table and predicts the full final standings. We average the predicted position of every team and count how many models put each team first, in the top four or in the bottom three.
Is this betting advice?
No. It is an AI forecast for entertainment and research. Early-season tables change a lot.
More AI table predictions: AI La Liga table prediction, AI Serie A table prediction, AI Bundesliga table prediction, AI Ligue 1 table prediction .
Want match-by-match picks? See AI Premier League predictions this week, check every model's record on the AI leaderboard, or ask the AIs your own question.