AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% BOU 2-1 ACM · 50% BEş 2-1 CRY · 56% CEL 0-2 RED · 59% CEL 2-1 CEL · 44% 189 1-2 LYO · 53% JAG 1-2 AND · 47% LIL 0-1 REA · 53% OLY 2-1 SPA · 55% OMO 1-2 BEN · 59% PLZ 1-0 LEV · 53% AAR 1-0 EGN · 52% AJA 2-1 ATA · 50% BOR 2-1 KUP · 55% AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% BOU 2-1 ACM · 50% BEş 2-1 CRY · 56% CEL 0-2 RED · 59% CEL 2-1 CEL · 44% 189 1-2 LYO · 53% JAG 1-2 AND · 47% LIL 0-1 REA · 53% OLY 2-1 SPA · 55% OMO 1-2 BEN · 59% PLZ 1-0 LEV · 53% AAR 1-0 EGN · 52% AJA 2-1 ATA · 50% BOR 2-1 KUP · 55%
SHL · Week 7 Oct 1, 2026 · 17:00 After Over Time

Skellefteå
vs
Malmo.

Quick answer

Who will win Skellefteå vs Malmo?

10 of 10 AI models pick Skellefteå to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 4–2 at 62% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (328 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Skellefteå (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 62% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Skellefteå win 100%

10 / 10 models

Malmo win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Skellefteå win
3–2
62%
Skellefteå's home advantage and stronger recent H2H record support a narrow win. Malmo has shown it can compete closely, so a controlled, one-goal game is more likely than a blowout.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Skellefteå win
4–2
62%
Skellefteå dominated recent head-to-head meetings and hold home-ice advantage early in the season; expect them to control tempo and finish more efficiently.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Skellefteå win
4–2
68%
Skellefteå consistently controls the matchup at home, relying on disciplined defensive structure and superior transition finishing against Malmo's lower-scoring attack.
04
Grok 4.6
Skellefteå win
3–1
62%
Skellefteå won four of five recent H2H meetings, including strong home results (4-0, 3-2, 4-1). Venue edge in SHL Week 5 supports a controlled home win, not a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Skellefteå win
3–1
62%
Skellefteå won 4-0 at home in the most recent meeting and has controlled recent H2H at their venue; Malmo's only win came on home ice, so a home edge seems likely.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Skellefteå win
3–1
72%
Skellefteå dominated this H2H series 4-1 in wins, including a 4-0 shutout at home. Home venue and clear historical edge support a comfortable but not blowout margin.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Skellefteå win
3–1
68%
Skellefteå dominant in recent H2H (4-0, 4-1, 3-2) and home advantage; Malmo’s lone win was close.
08
Kimi K3
Skellefteå win
4–2
68%
Skellefteå won four of last five H2H meetings, including two home victories by 2+ goals, showing sustained matchup dominance at this venue.
09
GLM 5.3
Skellefteå win
4–2
62%
Skellefteå won 4 of the last 5 meetings and dominate at home; Malmo's attack stays dangerous, so a two-goal home margin fits.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Skellefteå win
3–2
62%
Skellefteå won three of the last five H2H meetings and has a strong recent home record. The games tend to be close but high-scoring, with the home side edging it.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 4–2. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before puck drop.

  • 4–2
    4 models
  • 3–1
    4 models
  • 3–2
    2 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Skellefteå

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 62% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.40 vs 1.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Skellefteå vs Malmo in SHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Skellefteå win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Skellefteå vs Malmo, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.