AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% BOU 2-1 ACM · 50% BEş 2-1 CRY · 56% CEL 0-2 RED · 59% CEL 2-1 CEL · 44% 189 1-2 LYO · 53% JAG 1-2 AND · 47% LIL 0-1 REA · 53% OLY 2-1 SPA · 55% OMO 1-2 BEN · 59% PLZ 1-0 LEV · 53% AAR 1-0 EGN · 52% AJA 2-1 ATA · 50% BOR 2-1 KUP · 55% AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% BOU 2-1 ACM · 50% BEş 2-1 CRY · 56% CEL 0-2 RED · 59% CEL 2-1 CEL · 44% 189 1-2 LYO · 53% JAG 1-2 AND · 47% LIL 0-1 REA · 53% OLY 2-1 SPA · 55% OMO 1-2 BEN · 59% PLZ 1-0 LEV · 53% AAR 1-0 EGN · 52% AJA 2-1 ATA · 50% BOR 2-1 KUP · 55%
SHL · Week 7 Oct 1, 2026 · 17:00 Finished

Djurgarden
vs
Farjestad.

Quick answer

Who will win Djurgarden vs Farjestad?

Final score: Djurgarden 0–4 Farjestad. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Djurgarden to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 3–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (328 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Djurgarden (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Djurgarden win 100%

10 / 10 models

Farjestad win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Djurgarden win
3–2
58%
Djurgarden won three of the four listed recent meetings, including both home games, suggesting a useful matchup and venue edge. Farjestad should keep this close, so a moderate-scoring one-goal home victory fits the limited context.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Djurgarden win
3–2
56%
Djurgarden won 3 of last 4 head-to-head meetings including recent tight games at home, giving them a slight edge with home ice.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Djurgarden win
3–2
58%
Djurgarden have won three straight tight encounters against Farjestad, leveraging disciplined home structure to edge another close, low-to-medium scoring clash.
04
Grok 4.6
Djurgarden win
3–2
58%
Djurgarden took three of the last four H2H, including tight home wins 2-1 and 1-0. Home ice in SHL Week 5 favors a similar one-goal edge over Farjestad.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Djurgarden win
3–1
63%
Djurgarden have won three of the last four meetings, including two home wins, and Farjestad have scored once or fewer in three of those games.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Djurgarden win
2–1
62%
Djurgarden won three of last four H2H meetings, including two tight home wins. Home ice and recent dominance over Farjestad support a narrow victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Djurgarden win
3–2
60%
Djurgarden holds recent H2H edge and home advantage; Farjestad competitive but likely edged in tight contest.
08
Kimi K3
Djurgarden win
3–2
58%
Djurgarden have won three of the last four H2H meetings, all tight, low-margin games; home edge in Stockholm keeps them slightly ahead in another close one.
09
GLM 5.3
Djurgarden win
3–2
60%
Djurgarden won three of the last four H2H meetings, all tight, low-scoring games, and home ice adds edge; Farjestad remains competitive, so a narrow 3-2 home win fits.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Djurgarden win
2–1
58%
Djurgarden have won three of the last four H2H, including the most recent, and hold home advantage; a tight, low-scoring game is likely given the historical pattern.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

7 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    7 models
  • 2–1
    2 models
  • 3–1
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Djurgarden

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.80 vs 1.70

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Djurgarden vs Farjestad in SHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Djurgarden win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Djurgarden vs Farjestad, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.