AI Premier League table prediction 2026/27
10 AI models read the current table and predicted where every team finishes. Their consensus champion is Manchester City (10 of 10 models put them first). Relegation favourites: Coventry, Hull City, Sunderland. Refreshed every week after the latest round.
| AI pos | Team | Avg finish | Range | Title | Top 4 | Relegated | Now |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Manchester City
|
1.0 | 1–1 | 10/10 | 10/10 | 0/10 | 1 · 15 pts |
| 2 |
 Arsenal
|
2.0 | 2–2 | 0/10 | 10/10 | 0/10 | 2 · 12 pts |
| 3 |
 Liverpool
|
3.0 | 3–3 | 0/10 | 10/10 | 0/10 | 6 · 9 pts |
| 4 |
 Chelsea
|
4.3 | 4–6 | 0/10 | 8/10 | 0/10 | 10 · 7 pts |
| 5 |
 Newcastle
|
5.1 | 5–6 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 9 · 8 pts |
| 6 |
 Brighton
|
6.6 | 4–9 | 0/10 | 2/10 | 0/10 | 3 · 10 pts |
| 7 |
 Manchester United
|
7.0 | 6–9 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 12 · 5 pts |
| 8 |
 Aston Villa
|
8.4 | 6–12 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 16 · 4 pts |
| 9 |
 Tottenham
|
9.3 | 6–19 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 1/10 | 20 · 2 pts |
| 10 |
 Brentford
|
10.3 | 8–12 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 4 · 9 pts |
| 11 |
 Everton
|
11.3 | 10–13 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 7 · 9 pts |
| 12 |
 Crystal Palace
|
13.0 | 10–16 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 15 · 4 pts |
| 13 |
 Leeds
|
13.4 | 9–17 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 5 · 9 pts |
| 14 |
 Nottingham Forest
|
13.9 | 10–18 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 1/10 | 13 · 5 pts |
| 15 |
 Bournemouth
|
15.3 | 14–17 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 17 · 3 pts |
| 16 |
 Fulham
|
15.6 | 13–18 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 3/10 | 19 · 2 pts |
| 17 |
 Hull City
|
16.4 | 8–19 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 5/10 | 8 · 8 pts |
| 18 |
 Sunderland
|
17.0 | 14–19 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 5/10 | 14 · 4 pts |
| 19 |
 Ipswich
|
17.1 | 13–19 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 5/10 | 11 · 6 pts |
| 20 |
 Coventry
|
20.0 | 20–20 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 | 18 · 3 pts |
Avg finish = mean predicted position across 10 AI models. Title / Top 4 / Relegated = how many models put the team there. "Now" = current position and points.
Premier League relegation predictor: who goes down?
- Coventry: relegated by 10 of 10 AI models (now 18th, 3 pts)
- Hull City: relegated by 5 of 10 AI models (now 8th, 8 pts)
- Sunderland: relegated by 5 of 10 AI models (now 14th, 4 pts)
- Ipswich: relegated by 5 of 10 AI models (now 11th, 6 pts)
- Fulham: relegated by 3 of 10 AI models (now 19th, 2 pts)
Each AI's predicted table
GPT-5.6 Luna: champion Manchester City, relegated Fulham, Hull City, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Manchester United
- Brighton
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Brentford
- Crystal Palace
- Everton
- Nottingham Forest
- Leeds
- Sunderland
- Bournemouth
- Ipswich
- Fulham
- Hull City
- Coventry
“Manchester City’s elite squad depth and sustained recent-season strength should overcome early variance and secure the title. Arsenal remain closest challengers, while Liverpool, Chelsea and Newcastle recover. Newly promoted or weaker-depth sides struggle over 38 matches: Coventry, Hull City and Fulham are relegated, with Ipswich also falling short.”
Claude Sonnet 5: champion Manchester City, relegated Ipswich, Sunderland, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Brighton
- Manchester United
- Tottenham
- Brentford
- Aston Villa
- Everton
- Leeds
- Fulham
- Bournemouth
- Crystal Palace
- Nottingham Forest
- Hull City
- Ipswich
- Sunderland
- Coventry
“City's squad depth and ruthless finishing carry them past Arsenal over 38 games. Chelsea and Newcastle climb on talent; Tottenham/United rebound. Promoted sides Coventry, Sunderland, Hull/Ipswich lack quality depth and fade, joining a struggling Crystal Palace or Forest in relegation.”
Gemini 3.8 Flash: champion Manchester City, relegated Ipswich, Sunderland, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Brighton
- Manchester United
- Brentford
- Crystal Palace
- Everton
- Fulham
- Leeds
- Bournemouth
- Nottingham Forest
- Hull City
- Ipswich
- Sunderland
- Coventry
“Manchester City's flawless start and superior squad depth edge out Arsenal over 38 games. Struggling elite sides like Tottenham recover to mid-table as early-season noise fades. Promoted and lower-tier squads lack the quality to sustain early form, leaving Ipswich, Sunderland, and Coventry to suffer relegation.”
Grok 4.6: champion Manchester City, relegated Hull City, Sunderland, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Manchester United
- Tottenham
- Aston Villa
- Brighton
- Everton
- Nottingham Forest
- Brentford
- Crystal Palace
- Leeds
- Bournemouth
- Fulham
- Ipswich
- Hull City
- Sunderland
- Coventry
“City's squad depth and consistency make them champions despite early noise. Arsenal and Liverpool challenge closely. Spurs recover from poor start. Promoted Coventry, Sunderland and Hull lack quality to survive 38 games.”
DeepSeek V4 Pro: champion Manchester City, relegated Fulham, Hull City, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Brighton
- Manchester United
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Everton
- Brentford
- Leeds
- Nottingham Forest
- Crystal Palace
- Ipswich
- Bournemouth
- Sunderland
- Fulham
- Hull City
- Coventry
“Manchester City's perfect start and elite squad depth make them clear favourites. Arsenal push closest but fall short. Hull, Coventry and Sunderland lack top-flight quality and depth, so they are most likely relegated despite early points.”
Qwen 3.8 Max: champion Manchester City, relegated Sunderland, Hull City, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Brighton
- Aston Villa
- Manchester United
- Tottenham
- Crystal Palace
- Brentford
- Everton
- Nottingham Forest
- Leeds
- Bournemouth
- Fulham
- Ipswich
- Sunderland
- Hull City
- Coventry
“City's perfect start and squad depth sustain their title charge. Arsenal push close but fall short. Liverpool and Chelsea's quality sees them into the top four. Coventry, Hull, and Sunderland lack the depth to survive, with Ipswich also dragged down by inconsistency.”
Mistral Medium 3.5: champion Manchester City, relegated Fulham, Tottenham, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Brighton
- Newcastle
- Chelsea
- Manchester United
- Brentford
- Leeds
- Everton
- Hull City
- Aston Villa
- Ipswich
- Nottingham Forest
- Crystal Palace
- Sunderland
- Bournemouth
- Fulham
- Tottenham
- Coventry
“Man City's squad depth and consistency edge Arsenal. Brighton's overperformance regresses. Coventry, Fulham, Tottenham lack quality to escape relegation.”
Kimi K3: champion Manchester City, relegated Sunderland, Ipswich, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Manchester United
- Brighton
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Brentford
- Everton
- Crystal Palace
- Fulham
- Bournemouth
- Nottingham Forest
- Leeds
- Hull City
- Sunderland
- Ipswich
- Coventry
“Manchester City's perfect start and superior squad depth make them champions. Arsenal and Liverpool complete the top three. Newly promoted Coventry, Ipswich, and Sunderland face relegation, with Coventry's weak attack (1 goal in 5) particularly concerning. Hull City overperforms initially but lacks quality to survive.”
GLM 5.3: champion Manchester City, relegated Ipswich, Hull City, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Tottenham
- Manchester United
- Aston Villa
- Brighton
- Nottingham Forest
- Brentford
- Everton
- Crystal Palace
- Bournemouth
- Sunderland
- Fulham
- Leeds
- Ipswich
- Hull City
- Coventry
“Five games is noise; squad quality dominates. City's perfect start with the deepest squad makes them champions, edging Arsenal and Liverpool. Tottenham's dreadful start overstates weakness — they recover to mid-table. Promoted sides Hull, Coventry and Ipswich lack Premier League depth and go down, with Leeds also struggling.”
MiMo V2.5 Pro: champion Manchester City, relegated Nottingham Forest, Ipswich, Coventry
- Manchester City
- Arsenal
- Liverpool
- Brighton
- Chelsea
- Newcastle
- Manchester United
- Hull City
- Aston Villa
- Tottenham
- Brentford
- Leeds
- Everton
- Sunderland
- Fulham
- Crystal Palace
- Bournemouth
- Nottingham Forest
- Ipswich
- Coventry
“City's squad depth and consistency make them champions. Newly promoted sides (Ipswich, Coventry) and teams with weak defenses (Forest) will struggle and likely go down.”
How the AI table predictor works
Who will win the Premier League 2026/27 according to AI?
Manchester City (10 of 10 AI models). The consensus champion, by average predicted finish, is Manchester City.
Who will be relegated from the Premier League in 2026/27?
The AI models most often relegate Coventry (10 of 10), Hull City (5 of 10), Sunderland (5 of 10).
Who will finish in the top four?
By average predicted finish: Manchester City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea.
How is this AI table prediction made?
Every week, after the latest round, each of TuringStats's AI models (including GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok) receives the current table and predicts the full final standings. We average the predicted position of every team and count how many models put each team first, in the top four or in the bottom three.
Is this betting advice?
No. It is an AI forecast for entertainment and research. Early-season tables change a lot.
More AI table predictions: AI La Liga table prediction, AI Serie A table prediction .
Want match-by-match picks? See AI Premier League predictions this week, check every model's record on the AI leaderboard, or ask the AIs your own question.