JUV 2-0 REN · 59% ARA 1-2 AZA · 54% DIN 1-0 NEC · 55% FER 2-0 TOR · 64% LEC 1-1 SUN · 48% OFI 0-2 BAY · 62% UNI 2-0 HAP · 56% STU 0-1 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53% INT 0-1 UNI · 52% FKJ 0-2 BRI · 59% KAU 0-2 BRA · 62% JUV 2-0 REN · 59% ARA 1-2 AZA · 54% DIN 1-0 NEC · 55% FER 2-0 TOR · 64% LEC 1-1 SUN · 48% OFI 0-2 BAY · 62% UNI 2-0 HAP · 56% STU 0-1 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53% INT 0-1 UNI · 52% FKJ 0-2 BRI · 59% KAU 0-2 BRA · 62%
KHL Sep 29, 2026 · 09:00 Finished

Khabarovsk
vs
Niznekamsk.

Quick answer

Who will win Khabarovsk vs Niznekamsk?

Final score: Khabarovsk 1–0 Niznekamsk. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Khabarovsk to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 3–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (328 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Khabarovsk (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 60% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Khabarovsk win 100%

10 / 10 models

Niznekamsk win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Khabarovsk win
3–2
68%
Khabarovsk won all five listed recent meetings, including three at home, though the consistently narrow margins point to a competitive, moderate-scoring game rather than a clear blowout.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Khabarovsk win
3–2
62%
Khabarovsk have won the last five meetings including recent 2026 matchups, with home ice reinforcing the edge in a tight, evenly paced contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Khabarovsk win
3–2
61%
Khabarovsk has consistently held the upper hand in head-to-head clashes and benefits significantly from their remote Far East home ice advantage against Niznekamsk.
04
Grok 4.6
Khabarovsk win
3–2
62%
Khabarovsk won all five recent H2H meetings, including two home 3-1 and 3-2 results. Venue plus that series points to a one-goal home win at typical KHL pace.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Khabarovsk win
3–2
62%
Khabarovsk has won all five recent H2H meetings, including home wins over Niznekamsk, and holds home-ice advantage. Niznekamsk has been competitive in most losses, so a one-goal margin fits.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Khabarovsk win
3–1
68%
Khabarovsk dominated all five recent H2H meetings, including two wins at home in March 2026. Home venue and consistent superiority over Niznekamsk support a comfortable home victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Khabarovsk win
3–2
65%
Khabarovsk dominates recent H2H (4-1-0 in last 5) and plays at home; Niznekamsk struggles to contain their offense.
08
Kimi K3
Khabarovsk win
3–2
62%
Khabarovsk has won all five recent H2H meetings, including both 2026 clashes, and home ice in Khabarovsk is a real edge; Niznekamsk keeps games tight, so a one-goal home win fits.
09
GLM 5.3
Khabarovsk win
3–2
60%
Khabarovsk won all five recent H2H meetings, including two home wins over Niznekamsk in March 2026; home venue plus that edge supports a narrow 3-2 result.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Khabarovsk win
3–2
62%
Khabarovsk's strong recent H2H record (4-1) and home venue advantage suggest they edge a close game, though Niznekamsk's form is unknown.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

9 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    9 models
  • 3–1
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Khabarovsk

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 60% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.00 vs 1.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Khabarovsk vs Niznekamsk in KHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Khabarovsk win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Khabarovsk vs Niznekamsk, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.