BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
KHL Sep 28, 2026 · 16:30 Finished

Shanghai
vs
Sochi.

Quick answer

Who will win Shanghai vs Sochi?

Final score: Shanghai 4–1 Sochi. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Shanghai to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 4–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Shanghai (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Shanghai beat Sochi in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Shanghai win 100%

10 / 10 models

Sochi win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Shanghai win
4–3
64%
Shanghai has won three of the last four meetings, including two 4-2-or-better victories, suggesting a meaningful matchup edge. Sochi’s recent success in this series indicates a competitive, high-scoring home win rather than a runaway.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Shanghai win
4–3
58%
Shanghai won 4 of last 5 meetings including the most recent, showing consistent edge; expect another high-scoring, close contest at home.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Shanghai win
4–2
62%
Shanghai has held a solid upper hand in recent head-to-head meetings against Sochi, leveraging home ice advantage and consistent offensive production.
04
Grok 4.6
Shanghai win
4–2
58%
Recent H2H at Shanghai was 4-2 and 5-2; home ice plus those scoring patterns support a similar Shanghai win, not a repeat of the one-goal home loss.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Shanghai win
4–2
62%
Shanghai won three of the last four meetings, including both 2026 matchups, and hold home ice; Sochi's road form looks weaker.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Shanghai win
4–2
62%
Shanghai dominated recent H2H at home (4-2, 5-2, 6-2), showing clear offensive edge over Sochi. Home venue and consistent scoring pattern support another multi-goal win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Shanghai win
4–2
65%
Shanghai's recent H2H dominance (4-2, 5-2, 6-2) and home advantage outweigh Sochi's single win.
08
Kimi K3
Shanghai win
4–2
62%
Shanghai has won three of the last five H2H, including 4-2 and 5-2 home wins, and their attack consistently produces 4+ goals against Sochi; home-ice edge keeps them in front.
09
GLM 5.3
Shanghai win
4–2
61%
Shanghai have won four of the last five meetings with Sochi, scoring heavily, and hold home ice; recent H2H suggests a clear but not lopsided home win.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Shanghai win
4–2
62%
Shanghai's strong home record in H2H and recent 4-2 and 5-2 wins suggest offensive control; Sochi's away form is inconsistent, supporting a multi-goal home victory.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    8 models
  • 4–3
    2 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Shanghai vs Sochi in KHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Shanghai win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Shanghai vs Sochi, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Shanghai

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 4.00 vs 2.20

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.