Chicago Fire
vs
Charlotte.
Quick answer
Who will win Chicago Fire vs Charlotte?
8 of 10 AI models pick Chicago Fire to win (80%). The mean predicted score is 2–1 at 48% average confidence (medium).
Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.
10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Chicago Fire (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 48% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.
Who do you think will win?
Vote before kick-off and compare with AI
Where the panel lands.
Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.
8 / 10 models
2 / 10 models
0 / 10 models
10 picks. Receipts attached.
Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.
How often each scoreline showed up.
8 of 10 models settled on 2–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.
-
2–1
8 models
-
1–1
2 models
Trends and hit rates
How often each market landed in Chicago Fire's and Charlotte's last 10 matches, from our results archive.
| Market |
Chicago Fire (at home)
L
D
L
W
W
L
|
Charlotte (away)
D
L
D
L
W
|
|---|---|---|
| Won |
33%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
20%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
| Drew |
17%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
40%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
| Over 1.5 goals |
100%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
100%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
| Over 2.5 goals |
100%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
100%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
| Over 3.5 goals |
67%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
80%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
| Both teams scored |
100%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
100%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
| Scored |
100%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
100%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
| Clean sheet |
0%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
0%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
| Over 9.5 corners |
60%
All games 56% (5/9)
|
–
All games 50% (3/6)
|
| Over 3.5 yellow cards |
60%
All games 56% (5/9)
|
–
All games 17% (1/6)
|
Bars run newest to oldest. Corners and cards count matches with full statistics only.
Season data
Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.
Chicago Fire
4-4-2- W-D-L
- 16-7-11
- Goals
- 64-54
- Clean sheets
- 7
- Failed to score
- 3
- Best win run
- 3
- Penalties
- 6/10
Charlotte
4-2-3-1- W-D-L
- 15-9-10
- Goals
- 66-51
- Clean sheets
- 7
- Failed to score
- 6
- Best win run
- 2
- Penalties
- 4/6
Key players · Chicago Fire
-
P. Zinckernagel
7 G · 9 A · 33 apps
Key players · Charlotte
-
Pep Biel
12 G · 9 A · 34 apps
-
I. Toklomati Giorno
15 G · 5 A · 33 apps
Top scorers · Major League Soccer
- 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 26
- 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
- 3 S. Surridge Nashville SC 21
- 4 B. White Vancouver Whitecaps 20
- 5 Rafael Navarro St. Louis City 19
What’s moving the panel.
80% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.
Mean 48% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.
Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.
Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.
Ask the Council about this match
Pro10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.
Match stats forecast
Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.
| Metric | Chicago Fire | Charlotte | Expected total | Lean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corners | 4.7 | 3.8 | 8.5 | Under 8.5 52% | Ask AI |
| Yellow cards | 2.2 | 1.5 | 3.7 | Over 3.5 50% | Ask AI |
| Shots | 15.0 | 11.7 | 26.7 | Over 26.5 50% | Ask AI |
| Shots on target | 5.1 | 4.1 | 9.2 | Under 9.5 56% | Ask AI |
Sample: 4 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 461 graded matches, cards 57% of 462. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.
Form, history, team news.
- Columbus Crew 3-4 L
- Colorado Rapids 2-4 W
- Orlando City SC 2-2 D
- Atlanta United FC 2-3 W
- New England Revolution 1-0 L
- Inter Miami 3-3 D
- Orlando City SC 4-0 W
- CF Montreal 4-0 W
- Portland Timbers 3-2 L
- Philadelphia Union 2-2 D
Last five meetings.
CHI 1 · D 0 · CHA 0
Confidence trend
Cumulative average confidence in table order.
Betting tips (AI-signal view)
Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.
- Lean with the plurality: when 80% of models side with Chicago Fire, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
- Watch the draw lane at 20% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
- If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.
Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)
Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.
Over / under prediction (totals)
Model-derived xG sums to 2.80 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.1 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.
Handicap prediction (spread-style read)
When Chicago Fire is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.
BTTS prediction (both teams to score)
With combined offensive weight near 2.80 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.
Best bet framing (consensus-led)
Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Chicago Fire win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.
Match overview
Looking for a today prediction on Chicago Fire vs Charlotte in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.
This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Chicago Fire win, with vote shares roughly 80% / 20% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).
If you are asking who will win Chicago Fire vs Charlotte, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.
Explore more
Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.
Related matches
- Orlando City SC vs FC Cincinnati Major League Soccer
- Seattle Sounders vs Real Salt Lake Major League Soccer
- New England Revolution vs Philadelphia Union Major League Soccer
- FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers Major League Soccer
- Inter Miami vs Columbus Crew Major League Soccer
- St. Louis City vs Los Angeles FC Major League Soccer
From the blog
Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.
Charlotte Hornets vs Boston Celtics prediction for Saturday's NBA regular season clash. AI panel unanimous on winner and score at Spectrum Center.
NBA results Monday 26 October 2026: the ten-model AI consensus went 3 of 5 on the night, missing Charlotte's win over Washington and Dallas at Miami.
NBA results Tuesday 6 October 2026: AI predictions went 2 of 3 as Charlotte's unanimous backing collapsed and Minnesota and the Lakers delivered.
Orlando Magic vs Milwaukee Bucks prediction for the NBA regular season at Kia Center: the AI panel is unanimous, with a 114-108 consensus score.
Vegas Golden Knights vs Nashville Predators prediction: AI panel unanimously backs Vegas in NHL clash. See consensus, score picks and confidence.
Hockey results Thursday 12 November 2026: the AI consensus went 4 of 7 across seven NHL games, with Tampa Bay's rout of Buffalo the day's biggest miss.
Ask multiple AIs about this match.
10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.
You've used today's 3 free matches
Get the free app to see the AI picks for every match, follow your teams and get the picks before kickoff.
Get the free app Back to today's matches