MOL 1-0 KAZ · 47% SER 0-1 GER · 58% NET 2-1 GRE · 50% SLO 2-0 FAR · 60% BUL 0-1 ICE · 55% LIE 0-1 AZE · 52% LUX 0-1 EST · 47% AND 0-0 GIB · 39% SLO 0-1 SWI · 56% SCO 2-0 FYR · 64% SAL 0-3 CEL · 69% INT 1-2 SAN · 50% KOS 1-0 ISR · 50% NOR 2-1 WAL · 54% MOL 1-0 KAZ · 47% SER 0-1 GER · 58% NET 2-1 GRE · 50% SLO 2-0 FAR · 60% BUL 0-1 ICE · 55% LIE 0-1 AZE · 52% LUX 0-1 EST · 47% AND 0-0 GIB · 39% SLO 0-1 SWI · 56% SCO 2-0 FYR · 64% SAL 0-3 CEL · 69% INT 1-2 SAN · 50% KOS 1-0 ISR · 50% NOR 2-1 WAL · 54%
Politics · Kalshi · Closes Dec 1, 2026

Will the U.S. and Iran hold a senior-level meeting before Dec 1, 2026?

When will the U.S. and Iran hold a diplomatic meeting?

10 AI models
26% yes

0 lean yes · 10 lean no

Kalshi when AIs voted
24% yes

Now 6%

What each AI says

GPT-6 Luna

30% yes

Probably not — current reporting describes only mediated proposal exchanges and a highly conditional Iranian willingness to restart talks, with no senior-level meeting date. The short window to December 1 and unresolved preconditions make a qualifying meeting less likely, though Qatar-mediated diplomacy could produce a rapid announcement and meeting.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

30% yes

Probably not — talks are stalled and Iran conditions any restart on an end to hostilities and sanctions relief, with no meeting scheduled. Qatar-mediated diplomacy is active and Iran signaled it could return within days, so a meeting in the roughly 3 weeks left is possible. Indirect mediated talks may not count as a meeting held between the two sides, and a sudden breakthrough announcement could prove me wrong.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

18% yes

Probably not — talks remain indirect and mediated through Qatar, with Iran maintaining preconditions like sanctions relief before committing to direct engagement. With only three weeks remaining until the December 1 deadline, arranging a formal bilateral or direct multilateral meeting between senior officials faces heavy logistical and political friction. A rapid breakthrough mediated by Qatar that brings cabinet-level or special envoy officials into the same room could still prove this wrong.

Grok 4.7

18% yes

Probably not — as of 2026-11-10 talks remain stalled and indirect, with no confirmed senior-level date and Iran conditioning any restart on major concessions unlikely within three weeks. Qatar-mediated proposals are still only under review. A sudden announcement of a cabinet-level or envoy meeting could still flip this before Dec 1.

DeepSeek V4 Pro

25% yes

Probably not — as of Nov 10, 2026, reporting indicates only indirect, Qatari-mediated talks with no confirmed senior-level U.S.-Iran meeting scheduled before Dec 1. Iran’s stated willingness to restart talks is conditional on hostilities ending and sanctions relief, which are unlikely to be met in under three weeks. The main risk to this view is a surprise breakthrough in mediation or a hastily arranged high-level meeting that gets confirmed and reported by a qualifying source before the deadline.

Qwen 3.8 Max

25% yes

Probably not — as of November 10, talks remain stalled with no confirmed meeting date, and Iran's stated preconditions (end to hostilities, sanctions relief) appear unmet, making a senior-level meeting within 20 days unlikely. Active Qatari mediation and Iran's expressed willingness to meet quickly if conditions are satisfied provide some upside, but the current trajectory points toward continued indirect negotiations rather than a direct senior-level encounter. A sudden diplomatic breakthrough or a shift in preconditions could prove this wrong.

Meta Muse Spark 1.3

32% yes

Probably not — ongoing indirect diplomacy via Qatar with proposals still under review and no confirmed date as of Nov 10, with talks described as stalled. Iran's 2-day offer is conditioned on end to hostilities and sanctions relief that are not met. A rapid Qatari-mediated breakthrough accepting those conditions could still prove me wrong.

Kimi K3

35% yes

Probably not — as of today there is no confirmed senior-level U.S.-Iran meeting scheduled, and reporting from Nov 9-10 describes talks as stalled with only indirect mediation through Qatar. Iran's stated willingness to restart talks is conditioned on sanctions relief and an end to hostilities, which are steep preconditions to satisfy within three weeks. The main risk to this view is that back-channel diplomacy via Qatar moves quickly and a meeting gets announced on short notice before Dec 1.

GLM 5.3

22% yes

Probably not — talks are stalled with no confirmed senior-level meeting, and Iran conditions any restart on hostilities ending and sanctions relief, which is unlikely in three weeks. Indirect Qatar-mediated exchanges could continue without qualifying as a senior-level convened meeting. A sudden breakthrough or backchannel meeting reported by source agencies would prove me wrong.

MiMo V2.6 Pro

22% yes

Probably not — as of 2026-11-10 there is no confirmed senior-level U.S.-Iran meeting, and Iran has set preconditions (hostility cessation, sanctions relief) that appear unlikely to be met within three weeks. Mediation via Qatar is active and Iran signaled willingness to restart talks quickly, so a surprise breakthrough meeting before Dec 1 remains possible, but the current trajectory suggests continued indirect talks rather than a convened senior-level session.

News the AIs read (Nov 10)
- No senior-level U.S.-Iran diplomatic meeting is confirmed to have occurred yet as of 2026-11-10; the latest reporting says talks are still being mediated and proposals are being reviewed, with no finalized meeting date announced. - On 2026-11-09, Reuters reported Iran said it would be willing to restart peace talks in as few as two days, but only after conditions such as an end to hostilities and sanctions relief are met; that is not the same as a confirmed senior-level meeting. - On 2026-11-09, ABC News and CBS News reported talks remain stalled or not near a breakthrough, though mediation efforts continue through Qatar. - On 2026-11-10, reporting said the U.S. and Iran were still reviewing mediator proposals and that Qatar’s role remained active; this indicates ongoing diplomacy, but not a publicly scheduled U.S.-Iran meeting. - The real-world status is therefore: ongoing indirect negotiations, but no confirmed senior-level diplomatic meeting date before 2026-12-01 in the cited reports. - If a senior-level meeting is announced later, it would determine the question; as of the current reporting, that has not happened.
Resolution rules
If the United States and Iran hold a senior-level diplomatic meeting after Issuance and before Dec 1, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. Only reporting from any of the Source Agencies qualifies for the purposes of this market. Reports that merely reference prior publications (from before Issuance) do not qualify, unless the new article itself explicitly reaffirms the truth of the topic as of the publication date. Republishing of content originally produced by other sources (e.g., wire services) only qualifies if the content is hosted on the outlet's official platform and the outlet is clearly identified as the publishing entity. The meeting must be deliberately convened for diplomacy or negotiation, and each country must be represented by at least one senior official who actively participates in an official capacity. It need not produce an agreement, joint statement, or commitment to further talks. Only the part of a meeting held after Issuance counts; a meeting held entirely before Issuance does not qualify, even if reported afterward. A senior official is a head of state or government, vice president, foreign minister or other cabinet-rank minister, head of a national security council, presiding officer of a national legislature, special envoy, or anyone the head of state or government designates to conduct diplomatic negotiations on their behalf. Officials whose mandate is limited to technical, implementation, monitoring, staff-level, or preparatory discussions do not qualify. Qualifying officials include, without limitation, Donald Trump, JD Vance, Marco Rubio, Scott Bessent, Steve Witkoff, and Jared Kushner for the United States, and Mojtaba Khamenei, Masoud Pezeshkian, Abbas Araghchi, and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf for Iran. The meeting may be direct, with the officials meeting face to face in person (interpreters permitted), or indirect, with both delegations physically present in the same facility, venue, or city for a single organized round of talks and an intermediary authorized by both governments relaying communications between them on the same calendar day in the meeting location's local time. Phone or video contact, chance encounters, and exchanges limited to greetings, courtesies, or photo opportunities do not qualify, nor do the proceedings of standing international organizations or recurring multilateral summits such as the UN General Assembly. A separately arranged bilateral meeting held alongside such an event may qualify. A meetin...

Market prices: Kalshi. TuringStats is not affiliated with Kalshi.

More politics questions