COM 1-0 PAR · 57% TOR 0-1 ASR · 57% INT 2-1 UDI · 63% LEE 1-1 NEW · 57% VIL 1-1 REA · 57% RAY 1-1 ESP · 57% ALA 1-1 VAL · 56% ELC 0-2 REA · 68% ATL 1-0 OSA · 63% BAR 2-0 RAC · 70% REA 2-1 GET · 59% DEP 0-1 SEV · 58% LEV 1-2 ATH · 61% MAL 1-2 VIL · 57% COM 1-0 PAR · 57% TOR 0-1 ASR · 57% INT 2-1 UDI · 63% LEE 1-1 NEW · 57% VIL 1-1 REA · 57% RAY 1-1 ESP · 57% ALA 1-1 VAL · 56% ELC 0-2 REA · 68% ATL 1-0 OSA · 63% BAR 2-0 RAC · 70% REA 2-1 GET · 59% DEP 0-1 SEV · 58% LEV 1-2 ATH · 61% MAL 1-2 VIL · 57%
NFL · Regular Season · Week 1 Sep 13, 2026 · 20:25 SoFi Stadium, Inglewood Finished

Los Angeles Chargers
vs
Arizona Cardinals.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Los Angeles Chargers (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 24–20 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Los Angeles Chargers beat Arizona Cardinals in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Los Angeles Chargers win 100%

10 / 10 models

Arizona Cardinals win 0%

0 / 10 models

Advertisement
— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Los Angeles Chargers win
27–23
56%
The Chargers receive a meaningful SoFi Stadium edge in a Week 1 matchup with limited current-form information. Recent meetings have been close, so Arizona should score consistently, but Los Angeles is the slightly stronger home-side projection.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Los Angeles Chargers win
24–20
58%
Chargers open at home with Herbert and a strong defensive line; close H2H history suggests a tight, low-scoring opener favoring the hosts.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Los Angeles Chargers win
24–20
61%
The Chargers hold home-field advantage at SoFi Stadium, with a balanced run-first scheme that controls tempo against Arizona's dynamic offense in a close season opener.
04
Grok 4.6
Los Angeles Chargers win
24–17
58%
Week 1 at SoFi favors the Chargers; 2024 H2H was 17-15, so another tight, modest-scoring game with a home finish fits rusty September play.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Los Angeles Chargers win
24–20
60%
Chargers get a small edge at SoFi with a balanced offense and stronger defense, while Arizona's Kyler Murray keeps it close but falls short.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Los Angeles Chargers win
24–20
58%
Chargers at SoFi Stadium with home-field advantage in Week 1; H2H shows close contests, but LA's roster edge and venue give a slight nod.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Los Angeles Chargers win
24–20
60%
Home field and recent close H2H favor Chargers in tight Week 1 game.
08
Kimi K3
Los Angeles Chargers win
27–20
60%
Chargers at SoFi with the stronger roster and home edge; Cardinals have won recent tight H2H meetings, so expect a competitive one-possession game rather than a blowout.
09
GLM 5.3
Los Angeles Chargers win
24–20
58%
Week 1 with limited form data; Harbaugh-built Chargers defense and SoFi home edge tilt a tight matchup, though recent H2H games have been close, so a one-score margin fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Los Angeles Chargers win
23–20
58%
Recent H2H games show tight margins; Chargers' home venue at SoFi provides a slight advantage in this Week 1 opener.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 24–20. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 24–20
    6 models
  • 27–23
    1 model
  • 23–20
    1 model
  • 24–17
    1 model
  • 27–20
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Los Angeles Chargers vs Arizona Cardinals in NFL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (24 - 20; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Los Angeles Chargers win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Los Angeles Chargers vs Arizona Cardinals, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Los Angeles Chargers

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected points tilt 24.50 vs 20.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Advertisement

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.