FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37% FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 33 Boston Stadium, Boston Match Finished · 90'

New England Revolution
vs
New York Red Bulls.

Quick answer

Who will win New England Revolution vs New York Red Bulls?

Final score: New England Revolution 3–2 New York Red Bulls. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick New England Revolution to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 2–1.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → New England Revolution form New York Red Bulls form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (800 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward New England Revolution (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 54% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Major League Soccer table Where New England Revolution and New York Red Bulls stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

New England Revolution win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

New York Red Bulls win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
New England Revolution win
2–1
55%
New England’s stronger 17-10-4 record, 51 goals, and Gillette Stadium advantage outweigh New York’s recent improvement. The Red Bulls’ 56 goals conceded suggest the Revolution can edge an open match.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
New England Revolution win
2–1
53%
Revolution's superior record and hot streak (LLWWW) at home against a leakier Red Bulls defense (56 conceded) favor a narrow home win.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
New England Revolution win
2–1
52%
New England have been stronger overall this season (17 wins) and hold a reliable home record against the Red Bulls, whose defensive vulnerabilities should concede chances.
04
Grok 4.7
New England Revolution win
2–1
52%
Revolution’s stronger MLS record, home venue, and better attack versus Red Bulls’ leaky defense support a narrow home win; recent H2H is mixed so 2-1 stays modest.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
New England Revolution win
2–1
48%
New England's strong season and recent LLWWW form outweigh Red Bulls' inconsistent away record; H2H at Gillette favors the hosts.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
New England Revolution win
2–1
55%
New England's superior record (17W, +9 GD) and home form at Gillette favor them against a leaky NYRB defense (56 conceded), though H2H shows tight margins.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
New England Revolution win
2–1
62%
Revolution stronger form (LLWWW), better goal difference, home venue. Red Bulls leak goals (56 conceded).
08
Kimi K3
New England Revolution win
2–1
58%
New England's strong home record and Turgeman's 17 goal contributions outweigh Red Bulls' recent H2H wins; visitors' leaky defense (56 conceded) should concede twice at Gillette.
09
GLM 5.3
New England Revolution win
2–1
55%
Revolution strong at home (17W season, better goal difference) despite mixed form; Red Bulls leaky defense (56 conceded) but score often, so both teams score in a narrow home win.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
New England Revolution win
2–1
52%
New England's 17W home form and Turgeman's goals outweigh Red Bulls' 56 conceded; H2H shows open games, so a narrow home win fits despite Revolution's recent losses.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

10 of 10 models settled on 2–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–1
    10 models

Live match centre

Full-time
New England Revolution
Dor Turgeman 9', 46'
Dániel Gazdag 83'
3–2
New York Red Bulls
Cade Cowell 51'
Julian Hall 64'
Pro

Momentum, live stats, xG, player ratings and every event, minute by minute.

Unlock with Pro in the app

Bookmakers vs the AI panel

Bet365 · 2.10 / 4.00 / 3.10
New England Revolution Market 45% · AI 100%
Draw Market 24% · AI 0%
New York Red Bulls Market 31% · AI 0%

Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 10 AI models picking each result.

Team news

Confirmed lineups: New England Revolution vs New York Red Bulls

New England Revolution

4-3-3
M. Mićović
16 D. Gazdag
16 Gazdag
99 D. Turgeman
99 Turgeman
41 L. Langoni
41 Langoni
14 J. Yueill
14 Yueill
21 B. Raines
21 Raines
10 Carles Gil
10 Gil
23 W. Sands
23 Sands
66 J. Wynder
66 Wynder
22 E. Kohler
22 Kohler
12 I. Feingold
12 Feingold
30 M. Turner
30 Turner

Bench: D. Fagundez, T. Beason, C. Baker, M. Fofana, P. Miller, D. Parisian, M. Polster, J. Siqueira, G. Yow

New York Red Bulls

4-3-3
Michael Bradley
11 J. Ruvalcaba
11 Ruvalcaba
16 J. Hall
16 Hall
7 C. Cowell
7 Cowell
37 M. Sofo
37 Sofo
15 A. Mehmeti
15 Mehmeti
48 R. Donkor
48 Donkor
59 D. Padelford
59 Padelford
12 D. Nealis
12 Nealis
26 T. Parker
26 Parker
3 J. Marshall-Rutty
3 Marshall-Rutty
34 E. Horvath
34 Horvath

Bench: S. Kone, J. McCarthy, C. Faello, M. Dos Santos, D. Ruíz, C. Harper, E. Forsberg, R. Mosquera, E. Choupo-Moting

Season data

Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

New England Revolution

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
18-4-10
Goals
54-44
Clean sheets
6
Failed to score
7
Best win run
4
Penalties
7/8
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

New York Red Bulls

4-3-3
W-D-L
11-6-15
Goals
43-59
Clean sheets
5
Failed to score
9
Best win run
2
Penalties
1/1
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Top scorers · Major League Soccer

  1. 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 25
  2. 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
  3. 3 Rafael Navarro St. Louis City 19
  4. 4 M. Iloski Philadelphia Union 19
  5. 5 D. Bouanga Los Angeles FC 18
Venue Boston Stadium, Boston
Referee Christopher Penso
New at New England Revolution J. Wynder (Benfica), D. Gazdag (Columbus Crew), T. Smith (QPR)
New at New York Red Bulls C. Faello (New York Red Bulls), D. Padelford (Minnesota United FC), D. Ruíz (Inter Miami)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors New England Revolution

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 54% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.00 vs 1.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Result check

Actual New England Revolution win · AI New England Revolution win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

New England Revolution
#2 · 58 PTS · GD +10
Last 5
W W W W L
9 GF · 8 GA
Recent fixtures
  • New York Red Bulls 3-2 W
  • Philadelphia Union 1-2 W
  • Chicago Fire 1-0 W
  • FC Cincinnati 2-3 W
  • Seattle Sounders 0-3 L
Team news
L. Campana — Hamstring Injury J. Harrison — Lower-Body Injury A. Yusuf — Muscle Injury W. Sands — Leg Injury
New York Red Bulls
#10 · 39 PTS · GD -16
Last 5
L W L L W
9 GF · 8 GA
Recent fixtures
  • New England Revolution 3-2 L
  • Inter Miami 2-0 W
  • Toronto FC 0-2 L
  • DC United 2-1 L
  • San Diego 4-1 W
Team news
J. Bazan — Yellow Cards J. Che — Knee Injury
— Head to head

Last five meetings.

NEW 2 · D 0 · NEW 3

NEW VS NEW
1-0
HOME WIN
Feb 28, 2026
NEW VS NEW
5-3
HOME WIN
Jul 16, 2025
NEW VS NEW
2-1
HOME WIN
Mar 29, 2025
NEW VS NEW
1-0
HOME WIN
Jun 8, 2024
NEW VS NEW
4-2
HOME WIN
May 11, 2024

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with New England Revolution, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

New England Revolution
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
New York Red Bulls
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 3.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When New England Revolution is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 3.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: New England Revolution win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on New England Revolution vs New York Red Bulls in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is New England Revolution win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win New England Revolution vs New York Red Bulls, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.