COM 1-2 ASR · 47% ELC 1-1 CEL · 45% CRY 1-1 NOT · 45% HUL 1-2 EVE · 45% NIC 2-1 STR · 46% LAZ 2-0 MON · 51% LEC 0-1 BOL · 43% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 42% REA 2-0 DEP · 51% REN 2-1 AUX · 47% LIV 1-1 MAN · 43% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% SAS 1-2 ACM · 47% REA 2-1 OSA · 45% COM 1-2 ASR · 47% ELC 1-1 CEL · 45% CRY 1-1 NOT · 45% HUL 1-2 EVE · 45% NIC 2-1 STR · 46% LAZ 2-0 MON · 51% LEC 0-1 BOL · 43% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 42% REA 2-0 DEP · 51% REN 2-1 AUX · 47% LIV 1-1 MAN · 43% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% SAS 1-2 ACM · 47% REA 2-1 OSA · 45%
KHL Oct 4, 2026 · 11:30 Finished

Yekaterinburg
vs
Khabarovsk.

Quick answer

Who will win Yekaterinburg vs Khabarovsk?

Final score: Yekaterinburg 0–3 Khabarovsk. Before kickoff, 9 of 10 AI models pick Yekaterinburg to win (90%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 3–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Yekaterinburg (9 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Yekaterinburg beat Khabarovsk in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Yekaterinburg win 90%

9 / 10 models

Khabarovsk win 10%

1 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Yekaterinburg win
4–3
53%
Yekaterinburg has home advantage and won three of the last five meetings, but Khabarovsk recently scored five against them. The mixed history supports a competitive, moderately high-scoring home victory.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Yekaterinburg win
4–3
53%
Recent H2H is split with both teams scoring freely; home venue edge nudges a close, high-tempo game toward Yekaterinburg.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Yekaterinburg win
3–1
68%
Yekaterinburg holds strong home ice advantage where they consistently contain Khabarovsk's attack, historically limiting them to two goals or fewer in their meetings in Yekaterinburg.
04
Grok 4.6
Yekaterinburg win
3–2
58%
Yekaterinburg won all listed home H2H meetings (4-2, 3-1, 5-3). Khabarovsk travels far; modest home edge, typical KHL one-goal pace.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Yekaterinburg win
3–2
58%
Yekaterinburg won two of the last three home meetings against Khabarovsk, and home ice should help them edge a close, moderately paced game.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Yekaterinburg win
3–2
62%
Yekaterinburg won both home H2H meetings convincingly (4-2, 3-1, 5-3). Home ice advantage and historical dominance at this venue support a home win, though Khabarovsk's recent 5-2 away win adds uncertainty.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Khabarovsk win
4–5
60%
Khabarovsk won last two meetings; Yekaterinburg struggles defensively. Away form and recent H2H favor Khabarovsk.
08
Kimi K3
Yekaterinburg win
3–2
58%
Yekaterinburg took two of the last three home meetings with Khabarovsk, and home ice in the Urals is a real edge; Khabarovsk's January wins came at home, so a tight low-margin home win fits.
09
GLM 5.3
Yekaterinburg win
4–2
58%
Yekaterinburg has won three of the last five H2H meetings at home by multi-goal margins; home venue edge outweighs Khabarovsk's recent road win, though thin form data keeps confidence moderate.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Yekaterinburg win
3–2
58%
Recent H2H is split, but Yekaterinburg's home venue and a slight edge in recent form (4-2 win) suggest a narrow home victory in a competitive game.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    5 models
  • 4–3
    2 models
  • 4–5
    1 model
  • 3–1
    1 model
  • 4–2
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Yekaterinburg vs Khabarovsk in KHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Yekaterinburg win, with vote shares roughly 90% / 10% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Yekaterinburg vs Khabarovsk, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Yekaterinburg

90% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.40 vs 2.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

AI Polls: 10 AI Models Vote on Messi vs Ronaldo, Jordan vs LeBron and Brady
Insights
AI Polls: 10 AI Models Vote on Messi vs Ronaldo, Jordan vs LeBron and Brady

We ran AI polls on the biggest sports debates. Messi, Jordan, Brady and the Premier League all won 10-0, but penalty shootouts vs replays split the AIs 7-3. Every vote and reason.

AI Poll Maker: Create a Poll and Let 10 AI Models Vote (Free)
Insights
AI Poll Maker: Create a Poll and Let 10 AI Models Vote (Free)

Make a poll with 2-6 options and ten AI models vote and explain why, then share it so friends vote against the AI. Real examples: Japan spring vs autumn split 6-4, penalties vs replays 7-3.

ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude vs Grok: Same Questions, Different Answers, and Which AI Is Most Accurate
Insights
ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude vs Grok: Same Questions, Different Answers, and Which AI Is Most Accurate

We gave ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok and six more AIs the same questions and graded them on 2,303 real sports predictions. Claude is the most accurate in football, ChatGPT the most confident. Full results.

We Asked 10 AIs the Same Question: How to Ask Multiple AI at Once (Free)
Insights
We Asked 10 AIs the Same Question: How to Ask Multiple AI at Once (Free)

Ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and six more AIs the same question at once. We tried five real-life questions: one split 5-5, one was unanimous. Here is what the votes show and how to ask multiple AIs for free.

Jacksonville Jaguars vs Philadelphia Eagles Prediction: London Consensus
NFL
Jacksonville Jaguars vs Philadelphia Eagles Prediction: London Consensus

Jacksonville Jaguars vs Philadelphia Eagles prediction for the NFL London game: our 10-model AI panel unanimously backs Philadelphia to win at Tottenham.

Cagliari vs Juventus Prediction: AI Panel Backs Narrow Away Win
Serie A
Cagliari vs Juventus Prediction: AI Panel Backs Narrow Away Win

Cagliari vs Juventus prediction: AI panel consensus for Serie A at Unipol Domus. Juventus win 75%, most common score 0-1, average confidence 45%.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.