AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-1 BOR · 61% STA 1-1 NIC · 56% TOR 1-0 MON · 59% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 1-2 NOT · 57% ALA 1-0 MAL · 58% AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-1 BOR · 61% STA 1-1 NIC · 56% TOR 1-0 MON · 59% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 1-2 NOT · 57% ALA 1-0 MAL · 58%
SHL · Week 7 Sep 26, 2026 · 16:00 After Over Time

Timrå
vs
Djurgarden.

Quick answer

Who will win Timrå vs Djurgarden?

9 of 10 AI models pick Djurgarden to win (90%). The mean predicted score is 2–3 at 58% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Djurgarden (9 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–3 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Timrå win 10%

1 / 10 models

Djurgarden win 90%

9 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Djurgarden win
3–4
57%
Djurgarden won all three listed recent meetings, including twice in close two-goal-or-fewer games. Timrå’s home ice should keep this tight, but the early-season context supports a narrow away edge.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Djurgarden win
2–3
56%
Djurgarden won all three recent meetings, showing a consistent edge; early-season form gap still favors them over Timrå at home.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Timrå win
3–2
56%
Recent H2H meetings have been tightly contested one-goal games; Timrå's home-ice advantage should be enough to edge a closely matched Djurgarden.
04
Grok 4.6
Djurgarden win
2–3
58%
Djurgarden took the last three H2H, including 3-2 at Timrå. Week-4 SHL context is thin, so a one-goal away win is the most consistent line.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Djurgarden win
3–4
62%
Djurgarden won the last three meetings, including the most recent 3-2 away, and have scored three or more in all; Timrå's home venue is a marginal edge only.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Djurgarden win
2–3
62%
Djurgarden won all three recent H2H meetings, showing a clear edge over Timrå. Early-season context limits certainty, but historical dominance supports an away victory in a close contest.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Djurgarden win
3–4
60%
Djurgarden won last three H2H; Timrå struggles to contain their pace. Home ice narrows margin.
08
Kimi K3
Djurgarden win
2–3
62%
Djurgarden won all three recent meetings, each by one goal with consistent 3-2 or 4-2 patterns. Timrå's home ice hasn't overcome Djurgarden's structural edge in this matchup.
09
GLM 5.3
Djurgarden win
3–4
55%
Djurgarden won all three recent meetings, including at Timrå, showing a matchup edge that likely persists despite roster turnover; tight SHL tempo suggests a one-goal margin.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Djurgarden win
2–3
58%
H2H shows Djurgarden winning the last three, including two away. Timrå's home venue offers some advantage, but Djurgarden's recent form in this matchup suggests a narrow away win.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 2–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–3
    5 models
  • 3–4
    4 models
  • 3–2
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Djurgarden

90% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.50 vs 3.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Timrå vs Djurgarden in SHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Djurgarden win, with vote shares roughly 10% / 90% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Timrå vs Djurgarden, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.