FLA 2-0 IND · 60% ATL 1-0 CIE · 53% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51% FLA 2-0 IND · 60% ATL 1-0 CIE · 53% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51%
Extraliga · Week 2 Sep 16, 2026 · 15:30 Finished

Litvinov
vs
Kometa Brno.

Quick answer

Who will win Litvinov vs Kometa Brno?

Final score: Litvinov 2–1 Kometa Brno. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Kometa Brno to win (100%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Kometa Brno (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 61% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Litvinov beat Kometa Brno in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Litvinov win 0%

0 / 10 models

Kometa Brno win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Kometa Brno win
2–3
61%
Kometa Brno won four of the last five meetings, including a 7-2 result, while Litvinov’s home advantage keeps this Week 1 matchup competitive. A moderately paced game with a narrow away win is most plausible.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Kometa Brno win
2–4
62%
Kometa Brno has dominated recent meetings, winning 4 of last 5 including a lopsided 7-2 road win, suggesting a clear quality gap entering the season opener.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Kometa Brno win
2–4
62%
Kometa Brno has dominated recent head-to-head encounters with strong offensive execution, giving them the edge despite Litvinov having home ice in this season opener.
04
Grok 4.6
Kometa Brno win
2–4
56%
Brno took four of the last five H2H, including a 7-2 win. Litvinov’s home ice and Week 1 uncertainty argue against a blowout, so a 2-4 road result fits.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Kometa Brno win
2–4
60%
Kometa Brno took four of the last five meetings, including a 5-2 win in Litvinov in October; their transition attack matches up well against Litvinov's back line.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Kometa Brno win
2–4
62%
Kometa Brno won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings convincingly, including a 7-2 rout in January. Their offensive edge and historical dominance over Litvinov support an away victory despite Litvinov's home venue.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Kometa Brno win
3–4
65%
Kometa Brno won 4 of last 5 H2H; beat Litvinov 5-2 at this venue last.
08
Kimi K3
Kometa Brno win
2–4
60%
Kometa Brno won three of the last five meetings, including a 7-2 rout most recently; their stronger attack should prevail in Litvinov despite the hosts' occasional home upset.
09
GLM 5.3
Kometa Brno win
4–5
58%
Kometa won 3 of last 5 H2H including recent 7-2; early-season form unknown, so moderate confidence in a modest away margin.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Kometa Brno win
2–3
60%
Kometa Brno won the last three away meetings against Litvinov, suggesting edge; but early season form limits certainty for a close result.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 2–4. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–4
    6 models
  • 2–3
    2 models
  • 3–4
    1 model
  • 4–5
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Litvinov vs Kometa Brno in Extraliga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Kometa Brno win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Litvinov vs Kometa Brno, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Kometa Brno

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 61% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.30 vs 3.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.