FLA 2-0 IND · 60% ATL 1-0 CIE · 53% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51% FLA 2-0 IND · 60% ATL 1-0 CIE · 53% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51%
Extraliga · Week 2 Sep 18, 2026 · 15:30 Not Started

Litvinov
vs
Pardubice.

Quick answer

Who will win Litvinov vs Pardubice?

10 of 10 AI models pick Pardubice to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 2–4 at 65% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Pardubice (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 65% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Litvinov beat Pardubice in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Litvinov win 0%

0 / 10 models

Pardubice win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Pardubice win
3–4
68%
Pardubice have won all five listed recent meetings, including three in Litvinov, indicating a strong matchup edge. Litvinov’s home ice should keep this Week 2 game close, but Pardubice’s defensive consistency favors a narrow win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Pardubice win
2–3
58%
Pardubice have won 4 of last 5 head-to-head meetings, showing consistent edge over Litvinov even accounting for venue and roster changes.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Pardubice win
2–4
68%
Pardubice consistently dominates this matchup with superior forward depth and tactical discipline, having won all recent encounters against Litvinov.
04
Grok 4.6
Pardubice win
2–3
62%
Pardubice won the last five H2H meetings, including both visits to Litvinov. Early Week 2 form is thin, so a one-goal away win fits the matchup better than a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Pardubice win
3–4
62%
Pardubice have won the last five H2H meetings, often by multiple goals, and have outscored Litvinov 17-7 in that span. Litvinov's home edge is weak against this opponent.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Pardubice win
2–3
72%
Pardubice dominated all five recent H2H meetings convincingly, including away wins at Litvinov. Their consistent superiority in this matchup supports an away victory despite home venue.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Pardubice win
4–5
68%
Pardubice dominated recent H2H (4-1 in last 5), showing superior finishing and consistency.
08
Kimi K3
Pardubice win
2–4
68%
Pardubice have won all five recent H2H meetings, outscoring Litvinov 17-8, and their structured attack continues to exploit Litvinov's defensive gaps; expect a multi-goal away win.
09
GLM 5.3
Pardubice win
2–4
60%
Pardubice have won all five recent meetings against Litvinov, including twice away, showing a clear edge despite roster changes; expect a controlled away win with a moderate margin.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Pardubice win
2–4
68%
Pardubice dominated recent H2H with 5 straight wins, showing superior attack and Litvinov's defensive struggles at home.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 2–4. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 2–4
    4 models
  • 2–3
    3 models
  • 3–4
    2 models
  • 4–5
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Litvinov vs Pardubice in Extraliga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Pardubice win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Litvinov vs Pardubice, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Pardubice

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 65% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.40 vs 3.80

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.