EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60%
National League · Week 3 Sep 19, 2026 · 17:45 Finished

Lausanne
vs
Ambri-Piotta.

Quick answer

Who will win Lausanne vs Ambri-Piotta?

Final score: Lausanne 4–1 Ambri-Piotta. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Lausanne to win (100%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Lausanne (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 71% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Lausanne beat Ambri-Piotta in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Lausanne win 100%

10 / 10 models

Ambri-Piotta win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Lausanne win
4–2
72%
Lausanne’s home advantage and dominant recent head-to-head record point to a clear edge. Ambri-Piotta should generate chances, but Lausanne’s stronger recent scoring profile supports a two-goal margin.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Lausanne win
4–2
68%
Lausanne have dominated recent meetings decisively at home, and early-season form plus venue advantage favor a solid margin.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Lausanne win
4–1
72%
Lausanne has thoroughly dominated this matchup across recent meetings, consistently limiting Ambri-Piotta's scoring chances while exploiting home-ice advantage with superior depth and structure.
04
Grok 4.6
Lausanne win
4–2
66%
Lausanne swept recent H2H including multiple home routs; Week 3 National League still favors the home side, but Ambri should score more than those shutout-heavy past meetings.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Lausanne win
4–1
72%
Lausanne have dominated this matchup recently, winning all five H2H meetings with a combined 22-4 scoreline, including 5-1 and 5-0 home wins over Ambri-Piotta.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Lausanne win
4–1
72%
Lausanne dominated all five recent H2H meetings convincingly, including multiple multi-goal margins at home. Home venue and clear class gap support another comfortable win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Lausanne win
4–2
72%
Lausanne dominant in recent H2H, scoring 5+ in 3 of last 5; home advantage and consistent form.
08
Kimi K3
Lausanne win
4–2
68%
Lausanne have won the last five H2H meetings by multi-goal margins, including 5-1 twice last season; home ice and that sustained matchup edge support a comfortable but not blowout home win.
09
GLM 5.3
Lausanne win
4–1
70%
Lausanne have won five straight H2H meetings with Ambri-Piotta by multi-goal margins, including three home blowouts; home venue and that dominance support a comfortable win, though rosters have changed.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Lausanne win
4–2
78%
Lausanne's dominant H2H record (five straight wins, 22-4 goals) and home venue strongly favor them, with a high-scoring pattern likely to continue.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    6 models
  • 4–1
    4 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Lausanne vs Ambri-Piotta in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Lausanne win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Lausanne vs Ambri-Piotta, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Lausanne

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 71% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 4.00 vs 1.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.