DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51%
National League · Week 3 Sep 19, 2026 · 17:45 Finished

Davos
vs
Zug.

Quick answer

Who will win Davos vs Zug?

Final score: Davos 2–6 Zug. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Davos to win (100%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Davos (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 60% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Davos beat Zug in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Davos win 100%

10 / 10 models

Zug win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Davos win
4–3
58%
Davos has won four of the last five listed meetings, including three at home. Zug’s ability to score heavily keeps this Week 3 matchup close, but home advantage favors Davos in a high-tempo game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Davos win
4–3
58%
Davos won 4 of last 5 meetings including 3 at home, suggesting a home edge; early-season form still uncertain so margin kept tight.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Davos win
4–2
62%
Davos holds a decisive home-ice advantage at high altitude and has dominated recent head-to-head encounters against Zug in Davos with consistent offensive production.
04
Grok 4.6
Davos win
4–2
58%
Davos won recent home H2H 4-1, 7-3 and 4-1; Week 3 form is thin, but venue plus that scoring pattern still points to a Davos win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Davos win
4–2
62%
Davos won three of the last four meetings and is at home, where they beat Zug 4-1 twice this year. Zug's attack can score, but Davos looks stronger overall.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Davos win
4–2
62%
Davos won 3 of last 5 H2H including two dominant home performances (4-1, 7-3); home ice and early-season momentum favor them, though Zug showed they can score with a 5-2 road win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Davos win
4–2
62%
Davos dominant in recent H2H (4-1, 7-3, 4-1) and home advantage likely outweighs Zug’s one blowout win.
08
Kimi K3
Davos win
4–2
62%
Davos has won three of the last five H2H meetings, including two home victories this year. Their offense has produced 4+ goals in three of those five games, while Zug's defense has struggled to contain them.
09
GLM 5.3
Davos win
4–2
58%
Davos won four of the last five H2H meetings, including three home wins with strong scoring; home venue and history favor them, though rosters have changed since March.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Davos win
4–2
62%
Davos shows recent dominant H2H wins and home advantage; Zug's recent wins are older, suggesting a Davos-favored high-scoring game at home.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    8 models
  • 4–3
    2 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Davos vs Zug in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Davos win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Davos vs Zug, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Davos

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 60% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 4.00 vs 2.20

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.