AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-1 BOR · 61% STA 1-1 NIC · 56% TOR 1-0 MON · 59% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 1-2 NOT · 57% ALA 1-0 MAL · 58% AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-1 BOR · 61% STA 1-1 NIC · 56% TOR 1-0 MON · 59% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 1-2 NOT · 57% ALA 1-0 MAL · 58%
DEL · Week 7 Sep 27, 2026 · 14:30 Finished

Krefeld Pinguine
vs
Schwenninger.

Quick answer

Who will win Krefeld Pinguine vs Schwenninger?

Final score: Krefeld Pinguine 5–2 Schwenninger. Before kickoff, 9 of 10 AI models pick Krefeld Pinguine to win (90%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 3–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Krefeld Pinguine (9 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 57% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Krefeld Pinguine win 90%

9 / 10 models

Schwenninger win 10%

1 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Krefeld Pinguine win
3–2
52%
The fixture offers limited current-form information, so confidence is moderate. Krefeld’s home advantage and favorable historical matchup edge support a narrow win, with a competitive early-season DEL scoring profile.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Krefeld Pinguine win
4–3
52%
Early-season fixture with thin current-form data; historical meetings were close and high-scoring, home ice gives slight edge.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Schwenninger win
2–4
61%
Schwenninger Wild Wings bring superior top-flight structure and defensive stability compared to Krefeld, allowing them to control transitions and pull away late on the road.
04
Grok 4.6
Krefeld Pinguine win
3–2
56%
H2H leans Krefeld in close games, including a 3-2 home win. Week 4 form is thin, so a modest venue edge and typical DEL one-goal score.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Krefeld Pinguine win
3–2
58%
Krefeld's home edge and winning record versus Schwenninger in prior meetings support a narrow victory; scoring pattern trending to tight, one-goal games.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Krefeld Pinguine win
3–2
58%
Krefeld won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings and have home advantage; expect a close contest with slight edge to the Pinguine.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Krefeld Pinguine win
4–3
62%
H2H favors Krefeld at home; recent meetings tight but Pinguine edge in finishing.
08
Kimi K3
Krefeld Pinguine win
4–2
58%
Krefeld holds a strong historical edge over Schwenninger, winning four of the last five meetings, and home ice in Week 4 favors their structured defensive game against Schwenninger's inconsistent attack.
09
GLM 5.3
Krefeld Pinguine win
3–2
55%
Krefeld won four of the last five H2H meetings, including tight home wins, and home ice in Week 4 gives a modest edge; Schwenninger stays competitive, so a one-goal margin fits.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Krefeld Pinguine win
3–2
62%
Krefeld has a strong recent H2H record at home, winning 4 of the last 5 meetings. The venue advantage and historical pattern suggest a narrow home win in a competitive game.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    6 models
  • 4–3
    2 models
  • 2–4
    1 model
  • 4–2
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Krefeld Pinguine

90% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 57% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.20 vs 2.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Krefeld Pinguine vs Schwenninger in DEL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Krefeld Pinguine win, with vote shares roughly 90% / 10% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Krefeld Pinguine vs Schwenninger, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.