DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51%
National League · Week 3 Sep 18, 2026 · 17:45 Finished

Bern
vs
Davos.

Quick answer

Who will win Bern vs Davos?

Final score: Bern 5–2 Davos. Before kickoff, 8 of 10 AI models pick Davos to win (80%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Davos (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–3 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Bern beat Davos in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Bern win 20%

2 / 10 models

Davos win 80%

8 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Davos win
3–4
62%
Davos won the last three listed meetings, including two in Bern, suggesting a matchup edge. Bern’s home ice should keep this Week 2 contest close, but Davos is favored in a moderate-scoring game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Bern win
3–2
52%
Davos has won the last three meetings, but early-season home venue and motivation favor Bern in a tight matchup.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Davos win
2–3
56%
Davos has controlled recent head-to-head clashes against Bern, consistently winning tight, defensive battles both at home and on the road.
04
Grok 4.6
Davos win
2–3
58%
Davos took four of the last five H2H, including two wins in Bern. Week 2 form is thin, so a one-goal away edge is the best-supported line.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Davos win
2–3
58%
Davos won three of the last five meetings, including two in Bern, and their recent scoring edge over Bern supports another narrow away victory.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Davos win
2–3
62%
Davos won three of the last five H2H meetings including both 2025 visits to Bern, showing a clear edge in this fixture despite home advantage.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Davos win
2–3
62%
Davos won 3 of last 5 H2H, including recent 3-2 and 3-0 away; Bern’s home form inconsistent.
08
Kimi K3
Davos win
2–3
58%
Davos has won the last three meetings including two in Bern, suggesting a stylistic edge despite Bern's home ice; expect a tight, low-scoring contest typical of this matchup.
09
GLM 5.3
Bern win
3–2
55%
Davos won three of the last five H2H meetings, but Bern's home venue and the 4-0 home result over Davos support a narrow home win in a low-to-moderate scoring game.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Davos win
2–3
62%
Davos has won the last three meetings at Bern, showing a strong recent pattern in this fixture. Their recent form suggests they can edge a close game on the road.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

7 of 10 models settled on 2–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–3
    7 models
  • 3–2
    2 models
  • 3–4
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Bern vs Davos in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Davos win, with vote shares roughly 20% / 80% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Bern vs Davos, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Davos

80% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.30 vs 2.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.