NEC Nijmegen
vs
Bodo/Glimt.
Quick answer
Who will win NEC Nijmegen vs Bodo/Glimt?
Final score: NEC Nijmegen 1–3 Bodo/Glimt. Before kickoff, 5 of 10 AI models pick Bodo/Glimt to win (50%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 1–2.
Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.
10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Bodo/Glimt (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 45% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.
Who do you think will win?
Vote before kick-off and compare with AI
Where the panel lands.
Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.
1 / 10 models
4 / 10 models
5 / 10 models
10 picks. Receipts attached.
Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.
How often each scoreline showed up.
4 of 10 models settled on 1–2. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.
-
1–2
4 models
-
1–1
4 models
-
0–2
1 model
-
2–1
1 model
Trends and hit rates
How often each market landed in NEC Nijmegen's and Bodo/Glimt's last 10 matches, from our results archive.
| Market |
NEC Nijmegen (at home)
W
L
W
D
D
D
W
L
W
W
|
Bodo/Glimt (away)
D
|
|---|---|---|
| Won |
50%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
– |
| Drew |
30%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
– |
| Over 1.5 goals |
100%
All games 90% (9/10)
|
– |
| Over 2.5 goals |
80%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
– |
| Over 3.5 goals |
30%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
– |
| Both teams scored |
90%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
– |
| Scored |
100%
All games 90% (9/10)
|
– |
| Clean sheet |
10%
All games 20% (2/10)
|
– |
| Over 9.5 corners |
44%
All games 50% (4/8)
|
– |
| Over 3.5 yellow cards |
44%
All games 38% (3/8)
|
– |
Bars run newest to oldest. Corners and cards count matches with full statistics only.
Season data
UEFA Champions League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.
Bodo/Glimt
4-3-3- W-D-L
- 4-1-1
- Goals
- 13-11
- Clean sheets
- 2
- Failed to score
- 1
- Best win run
- 3
- Penalties
- 2/2
Key players · NEC Nijmegen
- No player in the competition's top scorers or assisters.
Key players · Bodo/Glimt
-
J. Hauge
2 G · 3 A · 7 apps
-
A. Helmersen
3 G · 1 A · 7 apps
-
S. Fet
2 G · 2 A · 7 apps
Top scorers · UEFA Champions League
- 1 J. Mickels Sabah FA 4
- 2 E. Demirović VfB Stuttgart 4
- 3 E. Haaland Manchester City 4
- 4 S. Guirassy Borussia Dortmund 4
- 5 Talisca Fenerbahçe 4
What’s moving the panel.
50% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.
Mean 45% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.
Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.
Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.
Ask the Council about this match
Pro10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.
Actual Bodo/Glimt win · AI Bodo/Glimt win
Form, history, team news.
- Dinamo Zagreb 2-4 W
- Fortuna Sittard 2-2 D
- Levski Sofia 1-1 D
- Ajax 1-1 D
- GO Ahead Eagles 1-1 D
No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.
- Napoli 4-3 L
- Ham-Kam 0-2 W
- Borussia Dortmund 1-0 W
- Kristiansund BK 3-1 W
- Rana 2-6 W
No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.
Last five meetings.
NEC 0 · D 0 · BOD 2
Confidence trend
Cumulative average confidence in table order.
Betting tips (AI-signal view)
Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.
- Lean with the plurality: when 10% of models side with NEC Nijmegen, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
- Watch the draw lane at 40% — tight UEFA Champions League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
- If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.
Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)
Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.
Over / under prediction (totals)
Model-derived xG sums to 2.50 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.8 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.
Handicap prediction (spread-style read)
When NEC Nijmegen is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.
BTTS prediction (both teams to score)
With combined offensive weight near 2.50 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.
Best bet framing (consensus-led)
Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Bodo/Glimt win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.
Match overview
Looking for a today prediction on NEC Nijmegen vs Bodo/Glimt in UEFA Champions League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.
This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Bodo/Glimt win, with vote shares roughly 10% / 40% / 50% home, draw, and away (rounded).
If you are asking who will win NEC Nijmegen vs Bodo/Glimt, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.
Explore more
Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.
Related matches
From the blog
Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.
Dinamo Zagreb vs NEC Nijmegen prediction for their UEFA Europa League clash: AI panel consensus, model picks, key factors and predicted score.
Juventus vs NEC Nijmegen prediction for the UEFA Europa League league stage. See what 10 AI models forecast for the Allianz Stadium opener.
Ferencvarosi TC vs Torreense prediction for their UEFA Europa League clash. The AI panel unanimously backs a home win at Groupama Aréna – see the…
NBA results Wednesday 21 October 2026: the ten-model panel went 4 of 6 on its picks, missing on Spurs and Nets. Full verdicts, model tallies and scores.
Hockey results Wednesday 21 October 2026: the 10-model AI consensus went 5 of 8 in the NHL, missing on the Blues, Sabres and Senators. Full review.
Football results Wednesday 21 October 2026: the AI consensus went 12 of 25. A brutal J1 League card and Como's rout of Manchester United headline the…
Ask multiple AIs about this match.
10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.