AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-0 BOR · 62% STA 2-1 NIC · 50% TOR 2-1 MON · 52% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 2-1 NOT · 47% ALA 1-0 MAL · 60% AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-0 BOR · 62% STA 2-1 NIC · 50% TOR 2-1 MON · 52% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 2-1 NOT · 47% ALA 1-0 MAL · 60%
FA Cup · 4th Round Qualifying Sep 22, 2026 · 18:45 · UTC Match Finished · 90'

Farnborough
vs
Uxbridge.

Quick answer

Who will win Farnborough vs Uxbridge?

Final score: Farnborough 0–2 Uxbridge. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Farnborough to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 2–0.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Farnborough form Uxbridge form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (577 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Farnborough (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–0 at 47% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Farnborough win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Uxbridge win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Farnborough win
2–0
62%
Farnborough’s home advantage and likely stronger level provide the clearest edge in this quarter-final, while the lack of form and H2H data supports a cautious, low-to-moderate scoring prediction.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Farnborough win
2–1
52%
Farnborough sit higher in the non-league pyramid and have home advantage in this cup quarter-final; expect a competitive but narrow home win.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Farnborough win
2–0
68%
Farnborough plays two tiers higher in the National League South compared to step 4 Uxbridge, giving them a significant quality and home advantage.
04
Grok 4.6
Farnborough win
1–0
52%
No H2H or form data; FA Cup QF at Farnborough favors a tight home edge. Low-scoring 1-0 fits a cautious cup night more than a 2-1.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Farnborough win
2–0
48%
Farnborough likely stronger at home in FA Cup against lower-ranked Uxbridge; expect controlled win with clean sheet more likely than open shootout.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Farnborough win
2–0
48%
FA Cup quarter-final at home gives Farnborough edge; Uxbridge likely to sit deep but Farnborough's superior level should prevail with a clean sheet.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Farnborough win
1–0
58%
FA Cup QFs often tight; Farnborough home advantage and higher league tier likely edge.
08
Kimi K3
Farnborough win
2–0
58%
Farnborough play a division above Uxbridge and hold home advantage in this Cup tie; expect the higher-league side to control possession and limit Uxbridge's chances, though non-league cup matches often stay tight.
09
GLM 5.3
Farnborough win
2–0
52%
No H2H data and thin context, so moderate confidence; Farnborough's home venue in an FA Cup tie favors a controlled win over lower-league visitors.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Farnborough win
1–0
62%
FA Cup home advantage for Farnborough; no H2H data and neutral context favor a low-scoring, tight match with a single home goal decisive.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 2–0. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–0
    6 models
  • 1–0
    3 models
  • 2–1
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Farnborough

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 47% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.70 vs 0.10

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Result check

Actual Uxbridge win · AI Farnborough win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Farnborough
—
Last 5
W L D L D
6 GF · 10 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Dagenham & Redbridge 2-0 W
  • Billericay Town 4-0 L
  • Walton & Hersham 2-2 D
  • Uxbridge 0-2 L
  • Uxbridge 2-2 D
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Uxbridge
—
Last 5
W L W W W
9 GF · 6 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Malvern Town 3-0 W
  • AFC Hornchurch 0-4 L
  • Evesham United 1-0 W
  • Hungerford Town 3-1 W
  • Basingstoke Town 2-1 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

FAR 0 · D 1 · UXB 1

FAR VS UXB
0-2
AWAY WIN
Sep 22, 2026
UXB VS FAR
2-2
DRAW
Sep 19, 2026

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with Farnborough, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight FA Cup games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Farnborough
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Uxbridge
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 1.80 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.1 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Farnborough is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 1.80 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Farnborough win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Farnborough vs Uxbridge in FA Cup? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 0; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Farnborough win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Farnborough vs Uxbridge, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.