AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-0 BOR · 62% STA 2-1 NIC · 50% TOR 2-1 MON · 52% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 2-1 NOT · 47% ALA 1-0 MAL · 60% AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-0 BOR · 62% STA 2-1 NIC · 50% TOR 2-1 MON · 52% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 2-1 NOT · 47% ALA 1-0 MAL · 60%
FA Cup · 4th Round Qualifying Sep 22, 2026 · 18:45 · UTC Match Finished · 90'

Dagenham & Redbridge
vs
Waltham Abbey.

Quick answer

Who will win Dagenham & Redbridge vs Waltham Abbey?

Final score: Dagenham & Redbridge 3–0 Waltham Abbey. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Dagenham & Redbridge to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 2–0.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Dagenham & Redbridge form Waltham Abbey form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (577 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Dagenham & Redbridge (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–0 at 56% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Dagenham & Redbridge win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Waltham Abbey win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
68%
Dagenham & Redbridge should have a substantial venue and squad-strength advantage over Waltham Abbey in this quarter-final. With no form or H2H data available, a controlled home win and clean sheet is the most defensible estimate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Dagenham & Redbridge win
3–0
68%
Large league gap (National League vs Isthmian tier) favors Dagenham comfortably at home in this cup quarter-final.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Dagenham & Redbridge win
3–0
78%
National League side Dagenham & Redbridge hold a significant quality and division advantage over non-league Waltham Abbey, pointing toward a comfortable home victory with a clean sheet.
04
Grok 4.6
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
52%
Dagenham are a clearly stronger National League-level side at home versus much smaller Waltham Abbey; cup QF context and no H2H still point to a controlled two-goal home win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
62%
Dagenham & Redbridge, a National League side, should dominate part-time Waltham Abbey at home in the FA Cup quarter-finals; a controlled 2-0 reflects the gulf in quality.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
52%
Dagenham & Redbridge sit higher in the pyramid and should dominate at home in this FA Cup tie, though limited data on Waltham Abbey keeps confidence moderate.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
62%
Dagenham & Redbridge (National League) likely stronger; home advantage in FA Cup. Waltham Abbey (lower tier) may struggle to score.
08
Kimi K3
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
62%
Dagenham & Redbridge, as a league side, hold a significant class advantage over non-league Waltham Abbey in this FA Cup quarter-final; home venue and professional depth should secure a clean-sheet victory.
09
GLM 5.3
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
55%
Dagenham host lower-tier Waltham Abbey; league-class gap and home advantage should bring a controlled win, though cup ties can be tight, so a modest 2-0 fits best.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Dagenham & Redbridge win
2–0
65%
Dagenham & Redbridge hold a significant league-tier advantage at home. Waltham Abbey's remarkable cup run shows defensive resilience, but the quality gap should tell in a disciplined 2-0 home win.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 2–0. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–0
    8 models
  • 3–0
    2 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Dagenham & Redbridge

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 56% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.20 vs 0.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Result check

Actual Dagenham & Redbridge win · AI Dagenham & Redbridge win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Dagenham & Redbridge
—
Last 5
L D L W W
5 GF · 5 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Farnborough 2-0 L
  • Hemel Hempstead Town 0-0 D
  • Brentwood Town 3-1 L
  • Hampton & Richmond 1-0 W
  • Waltham Abbey 3-0 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Waltham Abbey
—
Last 5
W L D W
10 GF · 5 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Croydon Athletic 7-1 W
  • Dagenham & Redbridge 3-0 L
  • Dagenham & Redbridge 1-1 D
  • Fakenham Town 0-2 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

DAG 1 · D 1 · WAL 0

DAG VS WAL
3-0
HOME WIN
Sep 22, 2026
WAL VS DAG
1-1
DRAW
Sep 19, 2026

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with Dagenham & Redbridge, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight FA Cup games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Dagenham & Redbridge
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Waltham Abbey
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.20 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.5 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Dagenham & Redbridge is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.20 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Dagenham & Redbridge win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Dagenham & Redbridge vs Waltham Abbey in FA Cup? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 0; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Dagenham & Redbridge win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Dagenham & Redbridge vs Waltham Abbey, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.