AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% BOU 2-1 ACM · 50% BEş 2-1 CRY · 56% CEL 0-2 RED · 59% CEL 2-1 CEL · 44% 189 1-2 LYO · 53% JAG 1-2 AND · 47% LIL 0-1 REA · 53% OLY 2-1 SPA · 55% OMO 1-2 BEN · 59% PLZ 1-0 LEV · 53% AAR 1-0 EGN · 52% AJA 2-1 ATA · 50% BOR 2-1 KUP · 55% AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% BOU 2-1 ACM · 50% BEş 2-1 CRY · 56% CEL 0-2 RED · 59% CEL 2-1 CEL · 44% 189 1-2 LYO · 53% JAG 1-2 AND · 47% LIL 0-1 REA · 53% OLY 2-1 SPA · 55% OMO 1-2 BEN · 59% PLZ 1-0 LEV · 53% AAR 1-0 EGN · 52% AJA 2-1 ATA · 50% BOR 2-1 KUP · 55%
NPB Sep 28, 2026 · 09:00 Finished

Yokohama BayStars
vs
Hiroshima Carp.

Quick answer

Who will win Yokohama BayStars vs Hiroshima Carp?

Final score: Yokohama BayStars 3–4 Hiroshima Carp. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Yokohama BayStars to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 6–3.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before first pitch. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 58% of the time (237 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Yokohama BayStars (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 6–3 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Yokohama BayStars win 100%

10 / 10 models

Hiroshima Carp win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Yokohama BayStars win
5–3
68%
Yokohama has won three of the last five meetings, including two convincing victories in Hiroshima. Returning home supports another controlled offensive edge, while Hiroshima’s recent wins suggest a competitive rather than one-sided game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Yokohama BayStars win
6–3
68%
BayStars have dominated the last five meetings, winning four decisively including two recent blowouts, and hold home-field advantage.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Yokohama BayStars win
5–2
63%
Yokohama has controlled recent head-to-head meetings with reliable run production while holding Hiroshima's lineup to limited offense.
04
Grok 4.6
Yokohama BayStars win
6–3
58%
Yokohama won the last three H2H meetings by multiple runs; at home they should again outscore Hiroshima without a blowout, given two earlier Carp wins.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Yokohama BayStars win
5–3
62%
Yokohama has won three of the last five H2H meetings, often by multiple runs, and holds home venue. Hiroshima's recent scoring in this matchup has been inconsistent.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Yokohama BayStars win
5–2
68%
BayStars dominated recent H2H with three straight wins by wide margins, and home venue advantage reinforces their edge over a struggling Carp side.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Yokohama BayStars win
6–3
68%
Yokohama BayStars won 3 of last 5 vs Hiroshima Carp, including recent 6-1 and 7-2; home advantage and current form favor them.
08
Kimi K3
Yokohama BayStars win
6–3
62%
Yokohama has won three of the last five meetings, including two September games by 7-2 and 6-1 margins. Home field and recent head-to-head momentum favor the BayStars.
09
GLM 5.3
Yokohama BayStars win
6–3
62%
Yokohama won three of the last five H2H meetings, outscoring Hiroshima 27-15, and their bats have handled Carp pitching recently; home venue adds edge.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Yokohama BayStars win
5–3
62%
BayStars have won three of the last four meetings, including two dominant recent wins, and hold the home venue advantage.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 6–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 6–3
    5 models
  • 5–3
    3 models
  • 5–2
    2 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Yokohama BayStars

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before first pitch.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 5.50 vs 2.80

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Yokohama BayStars vs Hiroshima Carp in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (6 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before first pitch.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Yokohama BayStars win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Yokohama BayStars vs Hiroshima Carp, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.