AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-1 BOR · 61% STA 1-1 NIC · 56% TOR 1-0 MON · 59% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 1-2 NOT · 57% ALA 1-0 MAL · 58% AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-1 BOR · 61% STA 1-1 NIC · 56% TOR 1-0 MON · 59% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 1-2 NOT · 57% ALA 1-0 MAL · 58%
NPB Oct 3, 2026 · 09:00 Finished

Yakult Swallows
vs
Chunichi Dragons.

Quick answer

Who will win Yakult Swallows vs Chunichi Dragons?

Final score: Yakult Swallows 1–3 Chunichi Dragons. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Yakult Swallows to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 4–3.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before first pitch. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 58% of the time (237 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Yakult Swallows (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–3 at 52% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Yakult Swallows win 100%

10 / 10 models

Chunichi Dragons win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Yakult Swallows win
5–4
54%
Yakult recently edged Chunichi 6-5 and has home-field advantage, but the Dragons won two of the prior four meetings. That points to a competitive, moderately high-scoring game with a narrow Swallows edge.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Yakult Swallows win
5–4
53%
Split recent H2H with both bullpens leaky; Yakult's home-field edge and narrow win in last meeting tip a close, moderately high-scoring contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Yakult Swallows win
4–3
56%
Yakult holds the home-field advantage at Meiji Jingu Stadium, where their offensive ceiling slightly edges Chunichi's pitching-heavy approach in tight recent head-to-head encounters.
04
Grok 4.6
Yakult Swallows win
4–3
55%
Mixed 2026 H2H with Yakult taking the latest meeting; Jingu home edge in a typically tight NPB scoring game favors a one-run Swallows win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Yakult Swallows win
4–3
58%
Yakult edged the most recent H2H 6-5 and have home venue; Chunichi's road form is mixed, suggesting a tight, one-run home win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Yakult Swallows win
4–3
58%
Yakult won the most recent H2H meeting and have home advantage; Dragons showed competitiveness but Swallows edge in a tight contest.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Yakult Swallows win
4–3
60%
Yakult edged Dragons in latest meeting; home form and venue advantage tilt close game.
08
Kimi K3
Yakult Swallows win
5–4
58%
Yakult won the most recent meeting 6-5 and holds home-field edge at Meiji Jingu, though Chunichi took three of the last five; expect another tight, high-contact finish between these evenly matched Central League rivals.
09
GLM 5.3
Yakult Swallows win
4–2
55%
Yakult won the latest H2H at home and Chunichi's recent wins were narrow; low-scoring NPB style suggests a modest home margin.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Yakult Swallows win
4–3
58%
Recent H2H shows tight games; Swallows have home advantage and edged the last meeting, suggesting a narrow win in a competitive matchup.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 4–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–3
    6 models
  • 5–4
    3 models
  • 4–2
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Yakult Swallows

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before first pitch.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 52% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 4.30 vs 3.20

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Yakult Swallows vs Chunichi Dragons in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before first pitch.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Yakult Swallows win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Yakult Swallows vs Chunichi Dragons, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.