NIC 1-1 LIL · 57% MAN 1-1 PIS · 52% FUL 1-2 MAN · 59% FCS 2-1 SVE · 59% JAG 1-1 LEG · 54% TSG 1-1 CHI · 51% JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% NIC 1-1 LIL · 57% MAN 1-1 PIS · 52% FUL 1-2 MAN · 59% FCS 2-1 SVE · 59% JAG 1-1 LEG · 54% TSG 1-1 CHI · 51% JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54%
NPB Sep 20, 2026 · 05:00 Not Started

Rakuten Gold. Eagles
vs
Fukuoka S. Hawks.

Quick answer

Who will win Rakuten Gold. Eagles vs Fukuoka S. Hawks?

10 of 10 AI models pick Fukuoka S. Hawks to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 5–6 at 59% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Fukuoka S. Hawks (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 5–6 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Rakuten Gold. Eagles beat Fukuoka S. Hawks in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Rakuten Gold. Eagles win 0%

0 / 10 models

Fukuoka S. Hawks win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
5–6
56%
Fukuoka has won three of the last five meetings and recently held Rakuten to one and zero runs, though Rakuten’s two wins indicate a competitive matchup. Expect a close, moderately high-scoring game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
5–6
55%
H2H split evenly recently but Hawks show stronger overall scoring pattern; close matchup favors slight away edge.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
2–4
62%
Fukuoka holds stronger pitching depth and superior run prevention in this matchup, giving them an advantage away from home against Rakuten.
04
Grok 4.6
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
3–5
58%
Hawks took three of five recent meetings, including two blowouts. SoftBank’s usual Pacific League edge travels; Eagles at home keep it competitive but not enough to reverse the H2H lean.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–5
58%
Hawks won two of the last three at Rakuten and scored 6+ in three of five H2H games; Rakuten's recent home form is mixed.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
3–5
62%
Hawks won 3 of last 5 H2H including dominant road performances; their pitching depth and offensive consistency give them the edge despite Rakuten's home venue.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
5–6
62%
Hawks won 3 of last 5, including recent 6-1 away; Eagles' inconsistency at home.
08
Kimi K3
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
3–5
58%
Hawks won the most recent meeting 6-1 and have taken three of the last five H2H, including two road wins at Rakuten in August; slight away edge in a moderate-scoring game.
09
GLM 5.3
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
2–5
58%
Hawks won 3 of the last 5 meetings including a 6-1 rout in August; Rakuten's home results vs Fukuoka were also losses, so a moderate away edge with a small margin fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–5
58%
Hawks have won 3 of the last 5 H2H, including a recent 6-1 win, and their offense has shown higher ceiling in this matchup.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

3 of 10 models settled on 5–6. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 5–6
    3 models
  • 3–5
    3 models
  • 4–5
    2 models
  • 2–4
    1 model
  • 2–5
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Rakuten Gold. Eagles vs Fukuoka S. Hawks in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (5 - 6; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Fukuoka S. Hawks win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Rakuten Gold. Eagles vs Fukuoka S. Hawks, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Fukuoka S. Hawks

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 3.60 vs 5.20

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.