JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53%
NPB Sep 20, 2026 · 09:00 Not Started

Chunichi Dragons
vs
Hiroshima Carp.

Quick answer

Who will win Chunichi Dragons vs Hiroshima Carp?

10 of 10 AI models pick Hiroshima Carp to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 4–5 at 62% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Hiroshima Carp (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–5 at 62% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Chunichi Dragons beat Hiroshima Carp in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Chunichi Dragons win 0%

0 / 10 models

Hiroshima Carp win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Hiroshima Carp win
4–5
64%
Hiroshima won four of the five latest meetings, including two in Chunichi, and has consistently limited the Dragons’ scoring. The Carp project for another narrow road victory in a moderate-scoring game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Hiroshima Carp win
3–5
60%
Carp have won four of the last five meetings, showing consistent recent dominance in this matchup and better offensive output.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Hiroshima Carp win
2–4
62%
Hiroshima has dominated recent head-to-head encounters with superior run prevention, while Chunichi continues to struggle producing offense consistently at home.
04
Grok 4.6
Hiroshima Carp win
2–4
58%
Carp took four of the last five meetings, including two of three at Chunichi, with low-to-mid run totals. Thin 2026 form beyond that H2H keeps the edge modest.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Hiroshima Carp win
4–5
62%
Hiroshima won three of the last five meetings and scored five runs twice in this fixture; Chunichi's home edge is not enough to reverse that trend.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Hiroshima Carp win
2–4
62%
Hiroshima won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings, including two convincing road wins in early September. Their pitching dominance over Chunichi continues to be the defining pattern.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Hiroshima Carp win
4–5
65%
Hiroshima Carp have won 4 of last 5 H2H, including recent away dominance.
08
Kimi K3
Hiroshima Carp win
3–5
62%
Hiroshima has won three of the last five meetings, including two of three in early September, showing a slight edge over Chunichi. Expect a competitive game with Hiroshima's offense proving slightly more consistent.
09
GLM 5.3
Hiroshima Carp win
4–5
60%
Hiroshima won four of the last five meetings, outscoring Chunichi 17-10 in that span; low-scoring NPB pattern suggests a modest Carp road win.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Hiroshima Carp win
4–5
62%
Hiroshima Carp have won 4 of the last 5 H2H meetings, including the most recent, showing a clear recent edge over Chunichi Dragons.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 4–5. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–5
    5 models
  • 2–4
    3 models
  • 3–5
    2 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Chunichi Dragons vs Hiroshima Carp in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 5; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Hiroshima Carp win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Chunichi Dragons vs Hiroshima Carp, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Hiroshima Carp

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 62% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 3.20 vs 4.70

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.