MOL 1-0 KAZ · 47% SER 0-1 GER · 58% NET 2-1 GRE · 50% SLO 2-0 FAR · 60% BUL 0-1 ICE · 55% LIE 0-1 AZE · 52% LUX 0-1 EST · 47% AND 0-0 GIB · 39% SLO 0-1 SWI · 56% SCO 2-0 FYR · 64% SAL 0-3 CEL · 69% INT 1-2 SAN · 50% KOS 1-0 ISR · 50% NOR 2-1 WAL · 54% MOL 1-0 KAZ · 47% SER 0-1 GER · 58% NET 2-1 GRE · 50% SLO 2-0 FAR · 60% BUL 0-1 ICE · 55% LIE 0-1 AZE · 52% LUX 0-1 EST · 47% AND 0-0 GIB · 39% SLO 0-1 SWI · 56% SCO 2-0 FYR · 64% SAL 0-3 CEL · 69% INT 1-2 SAN · 50% KOS 1-0 ISR · 50% NOR 2-1 WAL · 54%
NBA · Regular Season Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis Finished

Indiana Pacers
vs
Washington Wizards.

Quick answer

Who will win Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards?

Final score: Indiana Pacers 114–101 Washington Wizards. Before kickoff, 8 of 10 AI models pick Indiana Pacers to win (80%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 119–114.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before tip-off. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Indiana Pacers (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 119–114 at 57% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

NBA standings Where Indiana Pacers and Washington Wizards stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Indiana Pacers win 80%

8 / 10 models

Washington Wizards win 20%

2 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6.1 Sol
Indiana Pacers win
119–114
58%
Indiana's higher season scoring, stronger efficiency profile, home court and return possibilities for Nembhard support a narrow edge. Both teams play quickly and have allowed over 114 points recently, favoring a high-scoring game.
02
Claude Opus 5.5
Indiana Pacers win
118–113
56%
Both teams even at 2-2 with similar pace, but Pacers' superior offensive efficiency and home court tip a close, high-scoring game their way.
03
Gemini 4 Argon
Indiana Pacers win
119–114
58%
Both teams enter at 2-2 with equal rest, but Indiana's superior offensive efficiency and home advantage at Gainbridge Fieldhouse give them the edge in a fast-paced matchup.
04
Grok 4.7
Indiana Pacers win
118–112
58%
Pacers hold better per-100 offense and defense plus home court; both rest two days. Nembhard/Zubac absences and recent Wizards H2H wins keep the edge modest, not a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Indiana Pacers win
116–112
55%
Pacers have slightly better offensive efficiency and home court, but Wizards' Anthony Davis and Trae Young keep it close. Indiana's recent H2H struggles lower confidence.
06
Tencent Hy4
Washington Wizards win
110–114
57%
Both teams are struggling, but Washington has the stronger recent top scorer in Anthony Davis and won the last two H2H meetings; equal rest and Indiana's home edge keep this close.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
Washington Wizards win
114–118
56%
Pacers may miss Haliburton and Zubac, hurting creation and rebounding; Wizards' Davis-Young form plus three straight H2H wins support narrow road edge.
08
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Indiana Pacers win
113–107
58%
Pacers' superior offense and home court offset poor record; Wizards missing Coulibaly and on 4-game skid despite Davis' scoring.
09
GLM 5.3
Indiana Pacers win
116–110
58%
Pacers' faster pace and stronger offense at home edge it despite Wizards winning three of the last five meetings; both teams 2-2, so margin stays modest.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Indiana Pacers win
114–109
55%
Indiana's 108.8 offense and 56.4% eFG edge Washington's weaker attack despite Nembhard and Zubac sitting; both on two days rest, home court tips it. Wizards took three straight H2H, keeping it close.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

2 of 7 models settled on 119–114. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before tip-off.

  • 119–114
    2 models
  • 110–114
    1 model
  • 113–107
    1 model
  • 114–118
    1 model
  • 118–113
    1 model
  • 116–112
    1 model

Live game centre

Final
Indiana Pacers
114–101
Washington Wizards
Q1Q2Q3Q4 T
Indiana Pacers 26292237 114
Washington Wizards 25252724 101
26
25
Q1
29
25
Q2
22
27
Q3
37
24
Q4
Pro

Live team stats, the box score and every lead change, minute by minute.

Unlock with Pro in the app

Standings, rest and form

Where both teams stand, how rested they are, who carries the scoring and how their last ten games went.

AI spread
Pacers −5
AI total
233
Models picking
80%

From the mean predicted score of every model. Compare with your sportsbook's line.

Star matchup · last 3 games
Pascal Siakam
Pascal Siakam
Indiana Pacers · F
22.3 PTS 32.3
5 REB 10.7
5 AST 1.7
33 MIN 33
Anthony Davis
Anthony Davis
Washington Wizards · F

Indiana Pacers

4-8 · #11 Eastern
Home 1-4 · Away 3-3 · Last ten 3-7 · Streak W1
2 days of rest · 3 games in 7 days

Washington Wizards

4-8 · #12 Eastern
Home 2-2 · Away 2-6 · Last ten 3-7 · Streak L5
2 days of rest · 4 games in 7 days
Full NBA standings & playoff race →

Did not play last game

Regulars missing from the latest box score: injury, rest or suspension. Check the status before tip-off.

  • Bilal Coulibaly
    Bilal Coulibaly Wizards · G
    25 min · 5.5 pts a game before

Season averages per game

Indiana Pacers Washington Wizards
113.6 Points 108.9
47.4% Field goal % 45.4%
34.7% 3-point % 31.6%
76% Free throw % 78.7%
42.9 Rebounds 43.6
29.4 Assists 23.3
16.5 Turnovers 17.3
7.8 Steals 8.4
4.9 Blocks 5.7

Ratings and four factors

Per 100 possessions. Pace is possessions per game; defence uses points allowed over the last ten.

PacersWizards
Offensive rating 108.5 105.8
Defensive rating 109.5 109.9
Net rating -1 -4
Pace 104.7 103
Effective FG % 54.8 51.6
Turnover % 15.8 16.8
Free throw rate 25.8 32.2
3-point attempt rate 43.1 38.9

Key players · Indiana Pacers

  • Pascal Siakam
    Pascal SiakamF 22.3 pts · 5 reb · 5 ast
  • Andrew Nembhard
    Andrew NembhardG 16.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 7 ast
  • Aaron Nesmith
    Aaron NesmithG 13.3 pts · 3 reb · 2.3 ast

Averages over the last 4 games.

Key players · Washington Wizards

  • Anthony Davis
    Anthony DavisF 32.3 pts · 10.7 reb · 1.7 ast
  • Kyshawn George
    Kyshawn GeorgeF 21.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 5.4 ast
  • AD
    A. DybantsaF 16.2 pts · 6.8 reb · 2.4 ast

Averages over the last 3 games.

Last ten games

Indiana Pacers LLWLLLLLWL
Winning and losing margins, oldest to newest
Points scored / allowed
110.2 / 114.7
Total over 220.5
5/10
Total over 230.5
3/10
Scored 110+
3/10
Won by 6+
1/10
Washington Wizards LLLLWWLLWL
Winning and losing margins, oldest to newest
Points scored / allowed
106.1 / 113.1
Total over 220.5
5/10
Total over 230.5
4/10
Scored 110+
4/10
Won by 6+
2/10

Player photos via Wikimedia Commons: Pascal Siakam by Chensiyuan (CC BY-SA 4.0), Andrew Nembhard by Steve Cheng, Bruin Report Online (CC BY 2.0), Aaron Nesmith by Erik Drost (CC BY 2.0), Anthony Davis by Erik Drost (CC BY 2.0), Kyshawn George by All-Pro Reels (CC BY-SA 4.0), Trae Young by Erik Drost (CC BY 2.0), Bilal Coulibaly by All-Pro Reels (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Player props

Prop hit rates: Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards

Each line sits at the player's recent average. Bars show every game, green when he went over.

Pascal Siakam

Pascal Siakam

Indiana Pacers · F · last 9 games
Points o21.5 4/9 · 44% Ask AI
23
21
20
26
13
17
20
23
29
Rebounds o6.5 4/9 · 44% Ask AI
3
7
13
11
5
5
4
2
9
Assists o4.5 5/9 · 56% Ask AI
3
6
6
3
4
5
2
5
8
Pts + Reb + Ast o32.5 4/9 · 44% Ask AI
29
34
39
40
22
27
26
30
46
3-pointers made o1.5 5/9 · 56% Ask AI
3
3
1
0
0
0
2
2
5
Andrew Nembhard

Andrew Nembhard

Indiana Pacers · G · last 8 games
Points o17.5 4/8 · 50% Ask AI
16
14
18
22
23
22
9
12
Assists o7.5 4/8 · 50% Ask AI
5
3
14
9
4
4
8
12
Pts + Reb + Ast o26.5 5/8 · 63% Ask AI
23
18
35
33
30
28
18
27
3-pointers made o2.5 4/8 · 50% Ask AI
1
4
1
5
4
2
3
1
Aaron Nesmith

Aaron Nesmith

Indiana Pacers · G · last 9 games
Points o12.5 5/9 · 56% Ask AI
9
13
13
18
9
11
16
8
18
Pts + Reb + Ast o17.5 4/9 · 44% Ask AI
14
16
14
21
14
18
20
14
22
3-pointers made o2.5 3/9 · 33% Ask AI
1
2
3
3
1
0
2
2
4
Anthony Davis

Anthony Davis

Washington Wizards · F · last 8 games
Points o24.5 5/8 · 63% Ask AI
9
19
29
18
25
27
26
44
Rebounds o9.5 4/8 · 50% Ask AI
9
6
10
5
13
9
10
13
Pts + Reb + Ast o35.5 5/8 · 63% Ask AI
18
29
39
26
39
37
39
58
Trae Young

Trae Young

Washington Wizards · G · last 10 games
Points o18.5 6/10 · 60% Ask AI
22
25
22
14
21
15
18
23
4
20
Assists o8.5 6/10 · 60% Ask AI
12
9
10
8
9
9
6
10
3
7
Pts + Reb + Ast o30.5 5/10 · 50% Ask AI
35
38
38
27
37
27
26
35
12
28
3-pointers made o2.5 4/10 · 40% Ask AI
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
3
0
3
Kyshawn George

Kyshawn George

Washington Wizards · F · last 10 games
Points o17.5 5/10 · 50% Ask AI
11
22
20
8
12
22
25
33
14
12
Rebounds o4.5 2/10 · 20% Ask AI
3
9
4
2
4
4
4
4
7
3
Assists o5.5 4/10 · 40% Ask AI
3
5
2
11
3
5
7
7
6
2
Pts + Reb + Ast o27.5 4/10 · 40% Ask AI
17
36
26
21
19
31
36
44
27
17
3-pointers made o2.5 4/10 · 40% Ask AI
1
0
2
0
4
4
3
5
2
2

From box scores of each team's recent games. Lines are our reference points, not sportsbook prices.

Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards: quick answers

What is the predicted total for Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards?
The AI models' mean predicted score is Indiana Pacers 119, Washington Wizards 114: a projected total of 233 points. Indiana Pacers games went over 230.5 in 3 of the last 10; Washington Wizards games went over 230.5 in 4 of the last 10.
What is the AI spread pick for Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards?
The consensus has Indiana Pacers winning by 5 points (119–114), from the mean of every model's predicted score.
Who are the key players in Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards?
Leading scorers over the last 3 games. Indiana Pacers: Pascal Siakam (22.3 pts, 5 reb, 5 ast), Andrew Nembhard (16.5 pts, 2.3 reb, 7 ast). Washington Wizards: Anthony Davis (32.3 pts, 10.7 reb, 1.7 ast), Kyshawn George (21.2 pts, 4.4 reb, 5.4 ast).
Is Indiana Pacers or Washington Wizards on a back-to-back?
Indiana Pacers have had 2 days of rest; Washington Wizards have had 2 days of rest.
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Indiana Pacers

80% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before tip-off.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 57% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected points tilt 115.70 vs 112.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards in NBA? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (119 - 114; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before tip-off.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Indiana Pacers win, with vote shares roughly 80% / 20% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Indiana Pacers vs Washington Wizards, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.