EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60%
DEL · Week 2 Sep 18, 2026 · 17:30 Finished

Schwenninger
vs
Frankfurt Lowen.

Quick answer

Who will win Schwenninger vs Frankfurt Lowen?

Final score: Schwenninger 0–5 Frankfurt Lowen. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Schwenninger to win (100%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Schwenninger (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 66% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Schwenninger beat Frankfurt Lowen in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Schwenninger win 100%

10 / 10 models

Frankfurt Lowen win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Schwenninger win
4–2
68%
Schwenninger won the last four of five meetings, including three by multiple goals, and host this opener. Frankfurt’s recent H2H defensive struggles support a moderate home margin despite limited current-season form.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Schwenninger win
4–2
68%
Schwenninger have dominated recent H2H meetings including home blowouts, and season-opener venue advantage supports continued edge over Frankfurt Lowen.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Schwenninger win
4–2
64%
Schwenninger have dominated recent head-to-head encounters against Frankfurt, particularly on home ice where their offensive depth reliably overwhelms the Lowen defense.
04
Grok 4.6
Schwenninger win
4–2
62%
H2H heavily favors Schwenninger, especially at home with several high-scoring wins. Week 1 form is thin, so a moderate home margin rather than another blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Schwenninger win
4–2
62%
Schwenninger have dominated recent meetings, including 6-1 and 7-2 home wins, and open at home in Week 1 with clear scoring edge over Frankfurt Lowen.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Schwenninger win
4–2
72%
Schwenninger dominated this H2H series (4 of last 5 wins, often by wide margins) and play at home for Week 1. Strong historical edge supports a comfortable home victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Schwenninger win
4–2
68%
Schwenninger dominates recent H2H with high-scoring wins; home advantage and consistent finishing favor them.
08
Kimi K3
Schwenninger win
4–2
62%
Schwenninger have dominated this H2H recently, winning four of five including 6-1 and 7-2 home blowouts; Frankfurt's defence has struggled to contain them, though new-season roster turnover tempers confidence.
09
GLM 5.3
Schwenninger win
4–2
62%
Schwenninger won four of the last five H2H meetings, including dominant home wins over Frankfurt Lowen; home venue and history support a multi-goal margin.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Schwenninger win
4–2
68%
Schwenninger dominated recent H2H with high-scoring wins, and the home venue supports their attacking style against a Frankfurt side that concedes often.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

10 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    10 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Schwenninger vs Frankfurt Lowen in DEL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Schwenninger win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Schwenninger vs Frankfurt Lowen, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Schwenninger

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 66% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 4.00 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.