BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
National League · Week 9 Sep 29, 2026 · 17:45 Finished

Rapperswil-Jona
vs
Zug.

Quick answer

Who will win Rapperswil-Jona vs Zug?

Final score: Rapperswil-Jona 2–5 Zug. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Zug to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 2–4.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Zug (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 61% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Rapperswil-Jona beat Zug in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Rapperswil-Jona win 0%

0 / 10 models

Zug win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Zug win
4–5
68%
Zug’s 8-1 win in the latest meeting and broader H2H scoring edge support the away side, although Rapperswil-Jona’s home venue should keep the margin moderate in this early-season matchup.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Zug win
2–4
66%
Zug has dominated recent meetings, including an 8-1 rout in August, showing clear quality gap despite venue advantage for Rapperswil-Jona.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Zug win
2–4
63%
Zug possesses superior offensive depth and has dominated recent head-to-head encounters with heavy scoring, making them the likely victors on the road.
04
Grok 4.6
Zug win
2–4
58%
Zug is the stronger NL side and has several recent high-scoring wins over Rapperswil, including 8-1 away. Home ice is a modest offset; early-season Week 7 form is thin so confidence stays moderate.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Zug win
2–4
63%
Zug won 8-1 just weeks ago and has dominated this matchup recently; Rapperswil-Jona’s form looks shaky despite home ice.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Zug win
2–4
62%
Zug dominated recent H2H (8-1, 6-2 wins at Rapperswil). Despite one upset loss, Zug's attacking depth and historical edge at this venue support an away win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Zug win
5–6
72%
Zug's recent dominance in H2H and strong offensive form outweigh Rapperswil-Jona’s home ice.
08
Kimi K3
Zug win
2–4
62%
Zug dominated the most recent H2H 8-1 and historically outscore Rapperswil-Jona; their superior offensive depth should prevail despite Rapperswil's home venue.
09
GLM 5.3
Zug win
2–4
62%
Zug won three of the last five H2H meetings, including an 8-1 rout in August, and carry the stronger recent edge despite Rapperswil's home venue.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Zug win
2–4
68%
Zug's dominant recent H2H (8-1, 6-2 wins) and superior offensive firepower suggest they control this game, though home venue may keep Rapperswil-Jona competitive early.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 2–4. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–4
    8 models
  • 4–5
    1 model
  • 5–6
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Rapperswil-Jona vs Zug in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Zug win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Rapperswil-Jona vs Zug, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Zug

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 61% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.50 vs 4.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.