BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
National League · Week 9 Sep 30, 2026 · 17:45 After Penalties

Lausanne
vs
Servette.

Quick answer

Who will win Lausanne vs Servette?

7 of 10 AI models pick Servette to win (70%). The mean predicted score is 4–5 at 58% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Servette (7 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–5 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Lausanne beat Servette in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Lausanne win 30%

3 / 10 models

Servette win 70%

7 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Servette win
4–5
62%
Servette won four of the last five listed meetings, including a 5-1 result, while this rivalry has produced high-scoring games. Lausanne’s home ice should keep the margin narrow, but Servette’s recent matchup edge favors them.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Lausanne win
3–2
52%
Recent H2H is mixed with high-scoring games both ways; home ice gives Lausanne a slight edge in a closely contested rivalry matchup.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Lausanne win
3–2
55%
Lausanne hold a narrow edge at home in this derby, where recent playoff matchups suggest tightly contested, high-tempo battles decided by a single goal.
04
Grok 4.6
Lausanne win
4–3
56%
Early-season Week 7 at home; H2H was split and high-scoring. Lausanne gets a slight venue edge in a tight, open National League matchup.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Servette win
3–4
58%
Servette won the most recent meeting 5-1 and has outscored Lausanne in three of the last five, showing a clear edge in this matchup. Lausanne's home venue keeps it close, but Servette's finishing form points to a narrow away win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Servette win
2–3
58%
Servette won 3 of last 5 H2H meetings including a dominant 5-1 in April; their offensive edge over Lausanne persists despite venue change.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Servette win
4–5
68%
Servette's recent H2H dominance (4 wins in 5) and stronger finishing outweigh Lausanne's home ice.
08
Kimi K3
Servette win
2–4
62%
Servette has won three of the last five H2H meetings, including the most recent 5-1, showing a consistent edge over Lausanne despite venue. Expect Servette's superior attack to secure a multi-goal road victory.
09
GLM 5.3
Servette win
4–5
52%
Recent Léman derbies are high-scoring and tight; Servette won three of the last five, so slight away edge in an open 4-3 game despite Lausanne's home ice.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Servette win
2–3
58%
Servette won the last two away meetings and has a strong recent H2H record; Lausanne's home form is less clear, giving the edge to the visitors.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

3 of 10 models settled on 4–5. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 4–5
    3 models
  • 3–2
    2 models
  • 2–3
    2 models
  • 3–4
    1 model
  • 4–3
    1 model
  • 2–4
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Lausanne vs Servette in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 5; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Servette win, with vote shares roughly 30% / 70% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Lausanne vs Servette, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Servette

70% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.10 vs 3.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.