BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
National League · Week 9 Sep 29, 2026 · 17:45 Finished

Ambri-Piotta
vs
Davos.

Quick answer

Who will win Ambri-Piotta vs Davos?

Final score: Ambri-Piotta 0–3 Davos. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Davos to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 2–4.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Davos (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Ambri-Piotta beat Davos in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Ambri-Piotta win 0%

0 / 10 models

Davos win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Davos win
4–5
58%
Davos have won three of the last four meetings, including a 7-3 result, while Ambri-Piotta’s home advantage should keep this close. The recent head-to-head pattern supports an open, high-scoring game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Davos win
3–4
55%
Davos won 3 of last 5 head-to-head meetings with high-scoring patterns; recent form and away consistency slightly favor Davos in a close, open contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Davos win
2–4
62%
Recent head-to-head encounters show high-scoring affairs where Davos consistently finds offensive edges against Ambri-Piotta's backline.
04
Grok 4.6
Davos win
3–4
58%
Davos took three of the last five, including a 7-3 win; Ambri home helps but early-season NL meetings stay open and high-event, so a one-goal away edge fits.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Davos win
3–4
58%
Davos have won three of the last five meetings, including the most recent 7-3, and show stronger scoring in this matchup; Ambri-Piotta's home edge keeps it close.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Davos win
2–4
62%
Davos won 3 of last 5 H2H including a 7-3 rout in January; their offensive output against Ambri-Piotta has been consistently strong, and early-season form typically favors the deeper squad.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Davos win
4–5
68%
Davos dominates recent H2H (4-1 in last 5), stronger offensive form; Ambri-Piotta struggles to contain their pace.
08
Kimi K3
Davos win
2–4
58%
Davos has won three of the last five meetings and historically brings more offensive punch; Ambri-Piotta's home ice keeps it competitive but Davos's edge in head-to-head scoring prevails.
09
GLM 5.3
Davos win
4–5
55%
Davos won three of the last five H2H meetings and scored heavily in them, but Ambri-Piotta's home ice keeps this close; expect a one-goal game.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Davos win
2–4
62%
Davos has won 3 of the last 5 H2H, including a 7-3 blowout, and historically scores well against Ambri-Piotta, suggesting a strong away attack.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 2–4. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 2–4
    4 models
  • 4–5
    3 models
  • 3–4
    3 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Ambri-Piotta vs Davos in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Davos win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Ambri-Piotta vs Davos, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Davos

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.90 vs 4.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.