ABH 0-1 ALS · 57% AL- 2-0 ALT · 70% AL- 0-2 AL- · 59% AL- 1-1 ALD · 42% AL- 2-0 AL- · 64% ACM 2-1 FER · 49% AND 2-1 RED · 49% CRY 2-1 189 · 52% LEV 1-2 JAG · 48% LIL 1-1 PLZ · 42% NEC 1-2 OMO · 48% REA 2-1 LYO · 52% SPA 1-2 BOU · 54% AAR 0-1 SCB · 57% ABH 0-1 ALS · 57% AL- 2-0 ALT · 70% AL- 0-2 AL- · 59% AL- 1-1 ALD · 42% AL- 2-0 AL- · 64% ACM 2-1 FER · 49% AND 2-1 RED · 49% CRY 2-1 189 · 52% LEV 1-2 JAG · 48% LIL 1-1 PLZ · 42% NEC 1-2 OMO · 48% REA 2-1 LYO · 52% SPA 1-2 BOU · 54% AAR 0-1 SCB · 57%
NHL Finished

Philadelphia Flyers
vs
Minnesota Wild.

Quick answer

Who will win Philadelphia Flyers vs Minnesota Wild?

Final score: Philadelphia Flyers 2–4 Minnesota Wild. Before kickoff, 8 of 10 AI models pick Philadelphia Flyers to win (80%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 3–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Philadelphia Flyers (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 56% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Philadelphia Flyers win 80%

8 / 10 models

Minnesota Wild win 20%

2 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Philadelphia Flyers win
3–2
54%
Philadelphia has won four of the five listed recent meetings, including both most recent games, and gets home ice. With no current-season form or roster details supplied, that history supports only a modest edge in a close game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Minnesota Wild win
3–4
52%
Context is thin; Flyers won the last two meetings by one goal, but Minnesota's steadier roster depth and defensive structure give a slight edge. Expect a tight one-goal game in Philadelphia.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Minnesota Wild win
2–3
53%
Recent H2H meetings have been tightly contested one-goal games. Minnesota's edge in defensive structure gives them a slight advantage on the road in a low-scoring duel.
04
Grok 4.7
Philadelphia Flyers win
3–2
58%
Flyers won four of the last five meetings, including both recent ones by a single goal. Home ice and those tight results support a narrow Philadelphia win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Philadelphia Flyers win
3–2
56%
Flyers have won four of the last five head-to-head meetings, including both 2025-26 matchups, and hold home ice. Minnesota keeps games close, so a one-goal margin fits.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Philadelphia Flyers win
3–2
63%
Flyers have won 4 of last 5 H2H including both home meetings; recent results trend toward tight 2-3 goal totals favoring Philadelphia.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
Philadelphia Flyers win
4–2
54%
Flyers have won four of last five vs Wild including both recent meetings; home venue in Philadelphia supports narrow edge in even matchup.
08
Kimi K3
Philadelphia Flyers win
3–2
58%
Flyers have won four of the last five H2H meetings, including both 2025-26 matchups, all tight one-goal games; home ice nudges a close, low-scoring contest their way.
09
GLM 5.3
Philadelphia Flyers win
4–2
54%
Flyers have won three straight H2H meetings with the Wild, including twice in Minnesota; home venue supports them, though roster changes limit confidence.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Philadelphia Flyers win
3–2
56%
Flyers won the last two meetings over Minnesota and get home ice; recent H2H suggests tight, moderate-scoring games decided by one goal.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    6 models
  • 4–2
    2 models
  • 3–4
    1 model
  • 2–3
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Philadelphia Flyers

80% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 56% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.10 vs 2.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Philadelphia Flyers vs Minnesota Wild in NHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Philadelphia Flyers win, with vote shares roughly 80% / 20% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Philadelphia Flyers vs Minnesota Wild, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.