UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51% REI 1-0 MON · 54% ROD 1-0 NAN · 51% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51% REI 1-0 MON · 54% ROD 1-0 NAN · 51%
FA Cup · 2nd Round Qualifying Sep 18, 2026 · 18:45 · UTC Not Started

Yate Town
vs
Chippenham Town.

Quick answer

Who will win Yate Town vs Chippenham Town?

9 of 10 AI models pick Chippenham Town to win (90%). The mean predicted score is 0–1 at 55% average confidence (low).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Yate Town form Chippenham Town form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Chippenham Town (9 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 0–1 at 55% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Yate Town beat Chippenham Town in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Yate Town win 10%

1 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Chippenham Town win 90%

9 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Chippenham Town win
0–2
64%
Chippenham Town appear the stronger side on the available club context, while Yate Town’s home advantage may limit the margin. With no form or H2H data supplied, a controlled away win is the best estimate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Chippenham Town win
1–2
55%
Chippenham sit a division above Yate and typically field a stronger squad in FA Cup qualifying, though local derby intensity keeps it competitive.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Chippenham Town win
0–2
64%
Chippenham Town compete at a higher step in the National League South and should have the tactical edge and quality over Yate Town.
04
Grok 4.6
Chippenham Town win
0–1
48%
Chippenham are a higher-pyramid side (NL South vs Yate). FA Cup 2nd qualifying is often tight and low-scoring, so a narrow away win is the best single guess.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Chippenham Town win
1–2
48%
Chippenham likely step up from a higher tier; Yate's home cup edge keeps it close, but away quality should edge a tight FA Cup tie.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Chippenham Town win
0–1
42%
Chippenham Town typically sit higher in the non-league pyramid than Yate Town; FA Cup qualifying often produces tight, low-scoring affairs with the stronger side edging it narrowly.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Chippenham Town win
0–1
62%
Chippenham Town typically stronger in FA Cup ties; Yate Town home form inconsistent, low-scoring trend likely.
08
Kimi K3
Chippenham Town win
0–1
58%
Chippenham Town compete at a higher level (National League South) than Yate Town (Southern League), giving them a class edge in this FA Cup qualifier. Yate's home advantage may keep it tight, but the visitors' superior quality should secure a narrow victory.
09
GLM 5.3
Chippenham Town win
1–2
50%
Chippenham have generally operated a level above Yate in the non-league pyramid, giving them an edge despite the away venue. No H2H data available, so confidence stays moderate; FA Cup qualifying ties tend to be tight, low-margin games.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Yate Town win
2–1
55%
FA Cup qualifying often sees tight, competitive games; home advantage and the typical lower-league pattern of a narrow home win supports this scoreline.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 0–1. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 0–1
    4 models
  • 1–2
    3 models
  • 0–2
    2 models
  • 2–1
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Yate Town vs Chippenham Town in FA Cup? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (0 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Chippenham Town win, with vote shares roughly 10% / 0% / 90% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Yate Town vs Chippenham Town, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Chippenham Town

90% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Low confidence

Mean 55% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 0.50 vs 1.50

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Yate Town
Last 5
W
3 GF · 2 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Hanworth Villa 2-3 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Chippenham Town
Last 5
L
0 GF · 2 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Bath City 2-0 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 10% of models side with Yate Town, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight FA Cup games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Yate Town
~10%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Chippenham Town
~90%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Yate Town is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Chippenham Town win. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.