San Jose Earthquakes
vs
Houston Dynamo.
Quick answer
Who will win San Jose Earthquakes vs Houston Dynamo?
8 of 10 AI models pick San Jose Earthquakes to win (80%). The mean predicted score is 1–0 at 46% average confidence (medium).
Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.
Head-to-head history → San Jose Earthquakes form Houston Dynamo form
10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward San Jose Earthquakes (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–0 at 46% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.
Who do you think will win?
Vote before kick-off and compare with AI
Where the panel lands.
Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.
8 / 10 models
2 / 10 models
0 / 10 models
10 picks. Receipts attached.
Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.
How often each scoreline showed up.
7 of 10 models settled on 1–0. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.
-
1–0
7 models
-
1–1
2 models
-
2–1
1 model
Predicted lineups: San Jose Earthquakes vs Houston Dynamo
Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.
San Jose Earthquakes
B. Arena
Houston Dynamo
Trends and hit rates
How often each market landed in San Jose Earthquakes's and Houston Dynamo's last 10 matches, from our results archive.
| Market |
San Jose Earthquakes (at home)
W
D
D
W
D
W
|
Houston Dynamo (away)
L
W
D
D
L
D
|
|---|---|---|
| Won |
50%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
17%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
| Drew |
50%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
50%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
| Over 1.5 goals |
83%
All games 90% (9/10)
|
50%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
| Over 2.5 goals |
67%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
50%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
| Over 3.5 goals |
50%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
50%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
| Both teams scored |
83%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
50%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
| Scored |
100%
All games 90% (9/10)
|
67%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
| Clean sheet |
17%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
33%
All games 20% (2/10)
|
| Over 9.5 corners |
–
All games 63% (5/8)
|
–
All games 89% (8/9)
|
| Over 3.5 yellow cards |
–
All games 50% (4/8)
|
–
All games 50% (4/8)
|
Bars run newest to oldest. Corners and cards count matches with full statistics only.
Season data
Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.
San Jose Earthquakes
4-2-3-1- W-D-L
- 14-10-10
- Goals
- 57-51
- Clean sheets
- 7
- Failed to score
- 5
- Best win run
- 6
- Penalties
- 4/7
Houston Dynamo
4-2-3-1- W-D-L
- 14-9-11
- Goals
- 43-43
- Clean sheets
- 13
- Failed to score
- 10
- Best win run
- 5
- Penalties
- 3/3
Key players · San Jose Earthquakes
-
P. Judd
17 G · 2 A · 31 apps
-
N. Tsakiris
3 G · 9 A · 23 apps
Key players · Houston Dynamo
-
Guilherme
16 G · 8 A · 31 apps
Top scorers · Major League Soccer
- 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 26
- 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
- 3 S. Surridge Nashville SC 21
- 4 B. White Vancouver Whitecaps 20
- 5 Rafael Navarro St. Louis City 19
What’s moving the panel.
80% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.
Mean 46% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.
Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.
Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.
Ask the Council about this match
Pro10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.
Match stats forecast
Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.
| Metric | San Jose Earthquakes | Houston Dynamo | Expected total | Lean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corners | 5.7 | 4.4 | 10.1 | Under 10.5 58% | Ask AI |
| Yellow cards | 2.0 | 1.6 | 3.6 | Under 3.5 51% | Ask AI |
| Shots | 14.2 | 11.2 | 25.5 | Under 25.5 52% | Ask AI |
| Shots on target | 5.4 | 3.9 | 9.2 | Under 9.5 56% | Ask AI |
Sample: 4 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 461 graded matches, cards 57% of 462. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.
Form, history, team news.
- Minnesota United FC 3-1 L
- Real Salt Lake 2-1 W
- Colorado Rapids 2-2 D
- FC Dallas 3-0 L
- Nashville SC 1-1 D
- St. Louis City 0-1 L
- Portland Timbers 3-1 L
- Seattle Sounders 0-1 W
- Minnesota United FC 0-0 D
- FC Dallas 2-2 D
Last five meetings.
SAN 1 · D 0 · HOU 0
Confidence trend
Cumulative average confidence in table order.
Betting tips (AI-signal view)
Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.
- Lean with the plurality: when 80% of models side with San Jose Earthquakes, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
- Watch the draw lane at 20% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
- If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.
Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)
Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.
Over / under prediction (totals)
Model-derived xG sums to 1.40 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 1.7 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.
Handicap prediction (spread-style read)
When San Jose Earthquakes is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.
BTTS prediction (both teams to score)
With combined offensive weight near 1.40 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.
Best bet framing (consensus-led)
Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: San Jose Earthquakes win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.
Match overview
Looking for a today prediction on San Jose Earthquakes vs Houston Dynamo in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 0; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.
This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is San Jose Earthquakes win, with vote shares roughly 80% / 20% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).
If you are asking who will win San Jose Earthquakes vs Houston Dynamo, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.
Explore more
Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.
Related matches
From the blog
Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.
Orlando Magic vs Milwaukee Bucks prediction for the NBA regular season at Kia Center: the AI panel is unanimous, with a 114-108 consensus score.
Vegas Golden Knights vs Nashville Predators prediction: AI panel unanimously backs Vegas in NHL clash. See consensus, score picks and confidence.
Hockey results Thursday 12 November 2026: the AI consensus went 4 of 7 across seven NHL games, with Tampa Bay's rout of Buffalo the day's biggest miss.
NBA results Thursday 12 November 2026: the 10-model AI consensus went 7 of 10, with a perfect Cleveland call and a Nets rout that fooled eight models.
Football results Thursday 12 November 2026: the AI consensus called 10 of 12 correctly, but Italy's win over France and Armenia's draw with Cyprus…
Vancouver Canucks vs New York Rangers prediction: AI panel backs Rangers in NHL clash with 90% consensus and a most common score of 2-4.
Ask multiple AIs about this match.
10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.
You've used today's 3 free matches
Get the free app to see the AI picks for every match, follow your teams and get the picks before kickoff.
Get the free app Back to today's matches