UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51% REI 1-0 MON · 54% ROD 1-0 NAN · 51% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51% REI 1-0 MON · 54% ROD 1-0 NAN · 51%
Ekstraklasa · Regular Season - 9 Sep 14, 2026 · 17:00 · UTC Match Finished · 90'

Radomiak Radom
vs
Piast Gliwice.

Quick answer

Who will win Radomiak Radom vs Piast Gliwice?

Final score: Radomiak Radom 0–2 Piast Gliwice. Before kickoff, 5 of 10 AI models pick Radomiak Radom to win (50%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Radomiak Radom form Piast Gliwice form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Radomiak Radom (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–1 at 50% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Radomiak Radom beat Piast Gliwice in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Radomiak Radom win 50%

5 / 10 models

Draw 50%

5 / 10 models

Piast Gliwice win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Draw
1–1
34%
No recent form or head-to-head data is available, so uncertainty is high. Radomiak’s home advantage should balance Piast Gliwice’s likely competitiveness, pointing to a cautious 1-1 draw.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Radomiak Radom win
2–1
48%
Home venue edge for Radomiak in an early-season Ekstraklasa clash; Piast capable of scoring, so a narrow home win fits best without H2H data to lean on.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Draw
1–1
56%
Piast Gliwice typically maintain a compact, low-scoring defensive setup away from home, making a tightly contested 1-1 draw the most probable outcome against Radomiak.
04
Grok 4.6
Draw
1–1
52%
No 2026 form or H2H given. Radomiak at home versus typically compact Piast in Ekstraklasa points to a tight, low-scoring stalemate; 1-1 is the single most plausible line.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Radomiak Radom win
1–0
52%
Home edge at Radom and Piast's typically compact away setup point to a tight, low-scoring match; one goal may settle it.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Draw
1–1
52%
Both Radomiak and Piast are mid-table Ekstraklasa sides with limited attacking output; thin context and no H2H data support a cautious low-scoring draw.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Radomiak Radom win
1–0
55%
Ekstraklasa home edge often yields narrow wins; both teams defensively solid.
08
Kimi K3
Draw
1–1
45%
No H2H or form data available; Piast Gliwice typically play tight, low-scoring games while Radomiak's home edge is modest, making a 1-1 the most balanced estimate.
09
GLM 5.3
Radomiak Radom win
1–0
48%
No H2H or form data available, so confidence is low. Ekstraklasa games tend to be low-scoring; modest home edge at Radom supports a narrow 1-0.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Radomiak Radom win
1–0
55%
Home venue in Radom gives Radomiak Radom an edge, but with no head-to-head data and limited context, a tight home win is plausible.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 1–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–1
    5 models
  • 1–0
    4 models
  • 2–1
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Radomiak Radom vs Piast Gliwice in Ekstraklasa? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Radomiak Radom win, with vote shares roughly 50% / 50% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Radomiak Radom vs Piast Gliwice, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Radomiak Radom

50% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Low confidence

Mean 50% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.10 vs 0.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual Piast Gliwice win · AI Radomiak Radom win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Radomiak Radom
Last 5
L
0 GF · 2 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Piast Gliwice 0-2 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Piast Gliwice
Last 5
W
2 GF · 0 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Radomiak Radom 0-2 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

RAD 0 · D 0 · PIA 1

RAD VS PIA
0-2
AWAY WIN
Sep 14, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 50% of models side with Radomiak Radom, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 50% — tight Ekstraklasa games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Radomiak Radom
~50%
implied lean
Draw
~50%
implied lean
Piast Gliwice
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 1.70 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Radomiak Radom is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 1.70 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Radomiak Radom win. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.