AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-0 BOR · 62% STA 2-1 NIC · 50% TOR 2-1 MON · 52% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 2-1 NOT · 47% AL- 0-2 AL- · 60% AL- 2-0 ALD · 60% IFE 2-1 MAL · 53% VAS 2-0 HAL · 62% RAN 1-2 BRO · 46% ALA 1-0 KOC · 50% AL- 2-0 ALK · 62% GOA 2-1 TEL · 54% AL- 1-2 AL- · 43% VFB 2-0 BOR · 62% STA 2-1 NIC · 50% TOR 2-1 MON · 52% KOR 0-1 KVM · 52% IPS 2-1 NOT · 47%
FA Cup · 4th Round Qualifying Oct 3, 2026 · 14:00 · UTC Match Finished · 90'

Dorking Wanderers
vs
Chatham Town.

Quick answer

Who will win Dorking Wanderers vs Chatham Town?

Final score: Dorking Wanderers 1–0 Chatham Town. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Dorking Wanderers to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 2–0.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Dorking Wanderers form Chatham Town form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (579 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Dorking Wanderers (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–0 at 49% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Dorking Wanderers win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Chatham Town win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Dorking Wanderers win
2–1
56%
Dorking Wanderers should hold the home advantage against Chatham Town in this qualifying tie, but the limited form and head-to-head data make a narrow, competitive win more plausible than a comfortable margin.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Dorking Wanderers win
3–1
62%
Dorking Wanderers, a National League side, hold a significant level gap over National League South's Chatham Town, favoring a comfortable home win in this FA Cup qualifier.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Dorking Wanderers win
2–0
64%
Dorking Wanderers play at a higher competitive level and possess strong home form, which should see them comfortably control Chatham Town.
04
Grok 4.6
Dorking Wanderers win
2–0
52%
FA Cup qualifying at home favours Dorking as the higher-level side; no H2H or form data, so a controlled 2-0 rather than a shootout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Dorking Wanderers win
2–0
61%
Dorking's higher-division quality and home advantage in FA Cup qualifying should control a Chatham side likely to sit deep; a routine 2-0 reflects that gap without overestimating attacking output.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Dorking Wanderers win
2–1
52%
FA Cup qualifying round with limited context; Dorking's home advantage and slightly higher league standing give them a narrow edge in what should be a competitive tie.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Dorking Wanderers win
2–0
60%
Dorking Wanderers at home in FA Cup, likely stronger squad depth; Chatham Town lower division form suggests clean sheet possible.
08
Kimi K3
Dorking Wanderers win
2–0
58%
Dorking's higher-tier National League South quality and home advantage should prove decisive against lower-league Chatham in this FA Cup qualifier, though cup upsets are possible.
09
GLM 5.3
Dorking Wanderers win
2–1
52%
No H2H data and thin context; Dorking's home advantage at this FA Cup qualifying stage edges a modestly open game against Chatham Town.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Dorking Wanderers win
2–1
58%
FA Cup qualifying rounds often see tight, competitive matches; home advantage and the higher league status of Dorking Wanderers suggest a narrow, hard-fought victory.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 2–0. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–0
    5 models
  • 2–1
    4 models
  • 3–1
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Dorking Wanderers

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 49% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.10 vs 0.50

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Result check

Actual Dorking Wanderers win · AI Dorking Wanderers win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Dorking Wanderers
—
Last 5
L D W W W
13 GF · 11 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Dover 3-2 L
  • Dover 1-1 D
  • Chatham Town 1-0 W
  • Braintree 4-3 W
  • Southall 5-4 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Chatham Town
—
Last 5
W L W W L
10 GF · 2 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Dulwich Hamlet 0-4 W
  • Aveley 1-0 L
  • Brentwood Town 3-0 W
  • Leatherhead 3-0 W
  • Dorking Wanderers 1-0 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

DOR 1 · D 0 · CHA 0

DOR VS CHA
1-0
HOME WIN
Oct 3, 2026

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with Dorking Wanderers, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight FA Cup games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Dorking Wanderers
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Chatham Town
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.60 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.9 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Dorking Wanderers is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.60 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Dorking Wanderers win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Dorking Wanderers vs Chatham Town in FA Cup? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 0; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Dorking Wanderers win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Dorking Wanderers vs Chatham Town, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.