GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56% GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56%
NPB Sep 23, 2026 · 05:00 Not Started

Yakult Swallows
vs
Hanshin Tigers.

Quick answer

Who will win Yakult Swallows vs Hanshin Tigers?

10 of 10 AI models pick Hanshin Tigers to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 3–5 at 58% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Hanshin Tigers (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–5 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Yakult Swallows beat Hanshin Tigers in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Yakult Swallows win 0%

0 / 10 models

Hanshin Tigers win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Hanshin Tigers win
5–6
57%
Hanshin won three of the last five meetings and recently scored seven against Yakult. Yakult’s home setting keeps this competitive, but the Tigers have a slight recent matchup edge in a moderate-scoring game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Tigers won 4 of last 5 head-to-head meetings, including the most recent series, showing sustained recent dominance over Yakult.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Hanshin's superior pitching depth gives them the edge over Yakult at Jingu Stadium, continuing their strong head-to-head performance.
04
Grok 4.6
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Recent H2H tilts to Hanshin, including two wins at Yakult this month. Late-season NPB edge to the stronger Tigers attack; modest run environment, not a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Hanshin Tigers win
4–5
58%
Hanshin has won three of the last five meetings and scored seven in the most recent matchup; their offense looks stronger in this fixture.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Hanshin won 2 of last 3 H2H meetings convincingly (7-4, 6-2); Tigers' offense has been sharper in this matchup recently despite Yakult's home venue.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Hanshin Tigers win
6–7
62%
Hanshin won 3 of last 5 vs Yakult, including two recent high-scoring wins; away form and power hitting favor Tigers.
08
Kimi K3
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Hanshin took two of three at Jingu in early September and leads the season series; Tigers' lineup has produced more consistently, so a moderate road edge at Yakult's hitter-friendly park.
09
GLM 5.3
Hanshin Tigers win
5–6
55%
Hanshin won 3 of the last 5 meetings including two of three at Yakult's home park; Tigers' edge in recent H2H slightly outweighs Swallows' home venue.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
62%
Hanshin Tigers have won three of the last five H2H, including a recent 7-4 victory at Yakult, suggesting a slight edge in this matchup.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 3–5. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–5
    6 models
  • 5–6
    2 models
  • 6–7
    1 model
  • 4–5
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Yakult Swallows vs Hanshin Tigers in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 5; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Hanshin Tigers win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Yakult Swallows vs Hanshin Tigers, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Hanshin Tigers

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 3.80 vs 5.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.