GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56% GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56%
NPB Sep 23, 2026 · 05:00 Finished

Fukuoka S. Hawks
vs
Seibu Lions.

Quick answer

Who will win Fukuoka S. Hawks vs Seibu Lions?

Final score: Fukuoka S. Hawks 10–3 Seibu Lions. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Fukuoka S. Hawks to win (100%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Fukuoka S. Hawks (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Fukuoka S. Hawks beat Seibu Lions in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Fukuoka S. Hawks win 100%

10 / 10 models

Seibu Lions win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–3
56%
Fukuoka won three of the last five meetings and returns home, while Seibu’s recent win shows this should remain competitive. A modest scoring game with a narrow Hawks edge is the best fit.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–3
55%
Recent H2H split with Hawks winning big early September before Lions rebounded; home venue and season strength favor Hawks in a close contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
64%
Hawks have held the upper hand at home in head-to-head meetings, backed by superior pitching depth against a low-scoring Lions offense.
04
Grok 4.6
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
58%
Hawks hold home venue and won three of five recent H2H meetings, including shutouts; Lions split those games so a modest 4-2 home edge fits mixed form.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
57%
Hawks' strong home form and recent 8-2, 5-0 wins show offensive edge; Lions' 5-2 away win suggests they can score, but Hawks' depth and venue favor a controlled win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
62%
Hawks won 3 of last 5 H2H including a dominant 8-2 at home; home venue advantage and stronger recent form in this matchup support a moderate-margin win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
62%
Hawks hold home advantage and recent series edge; Lions' inconsistent offense suggests moderate scoring.
08
Kimi K3
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
58%
Hawks took three of the last five H2H, including two home wins this month, and Seibu's 5-2 win looks like the outlier; expect a low-scoring NPB game with the home side edging it.
09
GLM 5.3
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
58%
Hawks won three of the last five H2H meetings and have home advantage; recent matchups have been low-scoring, so a modest 4-2 margin fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Fukuoka S. Hawks win
4–2
62%
Hawks have won 3 of last 5 H2H, including a 5-0 shutout at home. Recent form and venue advantage favor them in a moderate-scoring game.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    8 models
  • 4–3
    2 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Fukuoka S. Hawks vs Seibu Lions in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Fukuoka S. Hawks win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Fukuoka S. Hawks vs Seibu Lions, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Fukuoka S. Hawks

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 4.00 vs 2.20

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.