CHI 2-0 YAT · 56% BRA 1-0 NEE · 54% CRO 0-2 HAM · 61% DAG 2-0 WAL · 62% FAR 2-0 UXB · 56% FAR 2-1 CIR · 53% GAI 1-0 LEA · 50% MAI 2-0 CRA · 57% TRU 2-1 MER · 53% WIM 1-2 WES · 53% WIN 0-1 HEM · 52% WOR 1-2 AFC · 53% DOR 2-0 SOU · 60% EXM 1-0 THA · 49% CHI 2-0 YAT · 56% BRA 1-0 NEE · 54% CRO 0-2 HAM · 61% DAG 2-0 WAL · 62% FAR 2-0 UXB · 56% FAR 2-1 CIR · 53% GAI 1-0 LEA · 50% MAI 2-0 CRA · 57% TRU 2-1 MER · 53% WIM 1-2 WES · 53% WIN 0-1 HEM · 52% WOR 1-2 AFC · 53% DOR 2-0 SOU · 60% EXM 1-0 THA · 49%
NPB Sep 21, 2026 · 05:00 Finished

Chunichi Dragons
vs
Hiroshima Carp.

Quick answer

Who will win Chunichi Dragons vs Hiroshima Carp?

Final score: Chunichi Dragons 10–0 Hiroshima Carp. Before kickoff, 6 of 10 AI models pick Chunichi Dragons to win (60%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Chunichi Dragons (6 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–3 at 24% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Chunichi Dragons beat Hiroshima Carp in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Chunichi Dragons win 60%

6 / 10 models

Hiroshima Carp win 40%

4 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Hiroshima Carp win
1–3
34%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Chunichi Dragons win
4–3
32%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Chunichi Dragons win
3–2
13%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
04
Grok 4.6
Chunichi Dragons win
2–1
11%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Chunichi Dragons win
4–3
13%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Chunichi Dragons win
4–1
12%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Hiroshima Carp win
3–4
13%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
08
Kimi K3
Chunichi Dragons win
4–3
35%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
09
GLM 5.3
Hiroshima Carp win
2–4
11%
FAIL (openrouter). Fallback random pick used. OpenRouter request failed (402): {"error":{"message":"This request requires more credits,
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Hiroshima Carp win
4–5
65%
Hiroshima Carp won four of last five H2H games, including a 5-2 victory, indicating consistent scoring and defensive edge over Chunichi Dragons.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

3 of 8 models settled on 4–3. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 4–3
    3 models
  • 4–5
    1 model
  • 1–3
    1 model
  • 3–4
    1 model
  • 4–1
    1 model
  • 2–1
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Chunichi Dragons vs Hiroshima Carp in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Chunichi Dragons win, with vote shares roughly 60% / 40% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Chunichi Dragons vs Hiroshima Carp, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Chunichi Dragons

60% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Low confidence

Mean 24% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 3.10 vs 2.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.