FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37% FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37%

Is Grok good at sports predictions?

Updated 31 October 2026

Short answer

Grok is competitive. On 1,916 graded football matches it picked the right result 49.8% of the time, against 52.5% for Claude, 48.9% for GPT and 50.5% for Gemini. In the NFL the current leader is Grok 4.7 at 61.1%.

Grok vs the others (football)

Model Right result
Grok 49.8%
Claude 52.5%
GPT 48.9%
Gemini 50.5%
DeepSeek 49.9%

How it is tested

Same match data for every model, picks locked before kickoff, graded after full time. Full table on the AI leaderboard.

Questions

Is Grok better than ChatGPT for predictions?

On our football record: Grok 49.8%, GPT 48.9%. The gap is small and changes; ten models together do better than either.

Ask 10 AIs before your next match.

Free picks for every match, every model graded, and your own questions answered by the whole council.