FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37% FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37%

Is DeepSeek good at predictions?

Updated 31 October 2026

Short answer

Yes, and it is cheap. On 1,916 graded football matches DeepSeek picked the right result 49.9% of the time (Claude 52.5%, GPT 48.9%). On prediction-market questions the model closest to the market most often so far is DeepSeek V4 Pro, beating the market price on 40 of 76 resolved questions.

Football

Model Right result
DeepSeek 49.9%
Claude 52.5%
GPT 48.9%
Grok 49.8%
Gemini 50.5%

Prediction markets

Blind to the price, the AI average picked the right side 68.4% of the time against 73.7% for the market on 76 questions. Live: AI vs Polymarket and Kalshi.

Questions

Is DeepSeek better than ChatGPT at predictions?

On our football record DeepSeek 49.9% vs GPT 48.9%. Both are beaten by ten models agreeing (62.1%).

Ask 10 AIs before your next match.

Free picks for every match, every model graded, and your own questions answered by the whole council.