GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56% GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56%
Extraliga · Week 4 Sep 22, 2026 · 16:00 Finished

Pardubice
vs
Liberec.

Quick answer

Who will win Pardubice vs Liberec?

Final score: Pardubice 4–5 Liberec. Before kickoff, 7 of 10 AI models pick Pardubice to win (70%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Pardubice (7 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 57% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Pardubice beat Liberec in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Pardubice win 70%

7 / 10 models

Liberec win 30%

3 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Pardubice win
3–2
53%
Pardubice have home advantage and won the most recent meeting, but Liberec’s stronger preceding head-to-head record suggests a closely contested game. A narrow, moderate-scoring home victory is the best estimate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Pardubice win
3–2
52%
Recent H2H is mixed with Liberec winning three of five, but Pardubice took the latest meeting at home; venue edge tips a close contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Pardubice win
4–2
64%
Pardubice boast strong home-ice advantage and deeper offensive lines, giving them the edge over a Liberec squad that historically concedes heavily on the road in this fixture.
04
Grok 4.6
Pardubice win
3–2
54%
Most recent H2H was a 2-1 home win for Pardubice; venue edge in Week 11 Extraliga. Liberec took four of five earlier meetings, so a one-goal home result is the modest call.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Pardubice win
3–2
58%
Pardubice won the most recent meeting 2-1 at home and hold venue advantage, but Liberec have taken three of the last five. Expect a tight, low-scoring game with home edge decisive.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Pardubice win
3–2
58%
Pardubice won the most recent H2H at home; home-ice advantage and early-season momentum favor a narrow home victory despite Liberec's strong historical record.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Liberec win
4–5
60%
Liberec's recent H2H dominance (4-2, 5-0, 3-2) and stronger away form outweigh Pardubice's home win earlier this year.
08
Kimi K3
Liberec win
2–3
58%
Liberec have won four of the last five H2H meetings, repeatedly beating Pardubice by one-goal margins; Pardubice's home edge keeps it tight, but Liberec's matchup dominance tilts a low-scoring game their way.
09
GLM 5.3
Pardubice win
3–2
55%
H2H is mixed with Liberec winning three of five, but Pardubice won the most recent meeting and host here; tight matchup suggests a narrow home win with moderate scoring.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Liberec win
2–3
58%
Liberec has won 3 of the last 5 H2H, including a 4-2 away win, and recent form suggests they can edge a close game despite Pardubice's home venue.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    6 models
  • 2–3
    2 models
  • 4–5
    1 model
  • 4–2
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Pardubice vs Liberec in Extraliga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Pardubice win, with vote shares roughly 70% / 30% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Pardubice vs Liberec, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Pardubice

70% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 57% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.00 vs 2.50

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.