GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56% GEO 1-0 NOR · 56% ARM 1-0 LAT · 53% GIR 1-0 ALB · 58% TüR 1-2 FRA · 59% ITA 1-1 BEL · 54% HUN 1-1 UKR · 51% POL 1-0 BOS · 56% SWE 1-0 ROM · 56% MON 1-0 CYP · 55% ATL 0-2 MON · 59% CLU 1-0 ATL · 52% ADC 1-0 REA · 53% SLO 1-1 SCO · 50% GRA 1-0 FCA · 56%
Extraliga · Week 4 Sep 20, 2026 · 15:00 Finished

Pardubice
vs
Karlovy Vary.

Quick answer

Who will win Pardubice vs Karlovy Vary?

Final score: Pardubice 5–2 Karlovy Vary. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Pardubice to win (100%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Pardubice (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 63% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Pardubice beat Karlovy Vary in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Pardubice win 100%

10 / 10 models

Karlovy Vary win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Pardubice win
3–2
61%
Pardubice have won four of the last five meetings and host this early-season matchup. Karlovy Vary’s recent victory shows the margin may be narrow, supporting a competitive, moderate-scoring home win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Pardubice win
4–2
62%
Pardubice have won 3 of last 5 H2H meetings decisively, including 4-0 and 4-1 at home, showing consistent home scoring edge over Karlovy Vary.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Pardubice win
4–2
72%
Pardubice boast superior squad depth and home ice advantage, having consistently controlled meetings in this fixture with strong offensive production against Karlovy Vary.
04
Grok 4.6
Pardubice win
4–2
58%
Pardubice have crushed Karlovy Vary at home (4-1, 4-0) in recent H2H; Week 3 form is thin, so a two-goal home win is the modest call.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Pardubice win
3–2
58%
Pardubice have won three of the last four H2H meetings and hold home ice; Karlovy Vary are competitive but Pardubice's finishing edge should decide a tight game.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Pardubice win
4–2
68%
Pardubice dominated H2H at home (4-1, 4-0) and won 4 of last 5 meetings. Home venue advantage and superior scoring output support a comfortable but not dominant win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Pardubice win
3–2
62%
Pardubice's home form and recent H2H wins (4-1, 3-0, 4-0) outweigh Karlovy Vary's lone recent win.
08
Kimi K3
Pardubice win
4–2
62%
Pardubice have won four of the last five H2H meetings, including three straight at home, and typically dictate tempo against Karlovy Vary. Home ice in Week 3 should see them control the pace and convert more chances.
09
GLM 5.3
Pardubice win
4–2
62%
Pardubice won four of the last five H2H, including dominant home wins over Karlovy Vary; home venue and stronger attack support a two-goal margin.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Pardubice win
3–2
62%
Pardubice's strong home record in recent H2H (3-1-1) and venue advantage suggest a narrow win, though Karlovy Vary's recent away victory shows they can compete.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    6 models
  • 3–2
    4 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Pardubice vs Karlovy Vary in Extraliga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Pardubice win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Pardubice vs Karlovy Vary, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Pardubice

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 63% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.60 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.