ABH 0-1 ALS · 57% AL- 2-0 ALT · 70% AL- 0-2 AL- · 59% AL- 1-1 ALD · 42% AL- 2-0 AL- · 64% ACM 2-1 FER · 49% AND 2-1 RED · 49% CRY 2-1 189 · 52% LEV 1-2 JAG · 48% LIL 1-1 PLZ · 42% NEC 1-2 OMO · 48% REA 2-1 LYO · 52% SPA 1-2 BOU · 54% AAR 0-1 SCB · 57% ABH 0-1 ALS · 57% AL- 2-0 ALT · 70% AL- 0-2 AL- · 59% AL- 1-1 ALD · 42% AL- 2-0 AL- · 64% ACM 2-1 FER · 49% AND 2-1 RED · 49% CRY 2-1 189 · 52% LEV 1-2 JAG · 48% LIL 1-1 PLZ · 42% NEC 1-2 OMO · 48% REA 2-1 LYO · 52% SPA 1-2 BOU · 54% AAR 0-1 SCB · 57%
NHL Not Started

New York Rangers
vs
Philadelphia Flyers.

Quick answer

Who will win New York Rangers vs Philadelphia Flyers?

10 of 10 AI models pick New York Rangers to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 4–2 at 58% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 61% of the time (379 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward New York Rangers (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

New York Rangers win 100%

10 / 10 models

Philadelphia Flyers win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
New York Rangers win
4–3
54%
Recent meetings are competitive despite the Rangers' two six-goal wins, and New York also has home ice. With no current-season form or roster details provided, a narrow Rangers win in a relatively open game is a modest lean.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
New York Rangers win
4–3
54%
Rangers won three of the last four meetings, including two comfortable wins in 2026, and they have home ice. Prior games were high-scoring and the teams are close, so the margin is expected to be one goal.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
New York Rangers win
4–2
60%
The Rangers generally hold the upper hand at Madison Square Garden with superior top-end scoring depth over the Flyers, though rivalry matchups remain competitive.
04
Grok 4.7
New York Rangers win
4–3
58%
Rangers won three of the last four meetings, twice by three goals, and have home ice. Recent rivalry games were high-scoring, so a one-goal home win fits better than a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
New York Rangers win
4–2
61%
Rangers have won three of last five in this matchup, often scoring heavily at home; Flyers' recent road form looks vulnerable against New York's attack.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
New York Rangers win
4–3
56%
Rangers lead recent H2H 3-2 and games average over 8 goals combined; home venue gives slight edge despite Flyers' road success in this series.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
New York Rangers win
4–2
58%
Rangers took three of last five meetings with high scoring at both venues; home ice at MSG supports their faster attack over Flyers.
08
Kimi K3
New York Rangers win
4–2
58%
Rangers took three of the last four meetings, including two 6-goal road wins, suggesting their attack matches up well against Philadelphia's defence; home ice at MSG adds a modest edge.
09
GLM 5.3
New York Rangers win
4–2
58%
Rangers won three of the last five meetings, including two emphatic road wins in Philadelphia; home ice adds edge, though Flyers' high-scoring win in April keeps confidence modest.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
New York Rangers win
4–2
58%
Rangers won three of last five H2H, often scoring 5-6 at MSG; Flyers' road defense has been leaky in these meetings. Home ice plus recent scoring edge favors New York in a moderately open game.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    6 models
  • 4–3
    4 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors New York Rangers

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 4.00 vs 2.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on New York Rangers vs Philadelphia Flyers in NHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is New York Rangers win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win New York Rangers vs Philadelphia Flyers, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.