ABH 0-1 ALS · 57% AL- 2-0 ALT · 70% AL- 0-2 AL- · 59% AL- 1-1 ALD · 42% AL- 2-0 AL- · 64% ACM 2-1 FER · 49% AND 2-1 RED · 49% CRY 2-1 189 · 52% LEV 1-2 JAG · 48% LIL 1-1 PLZ · 42% NEC 1-2 OMO · 48% REA 2-1 LYO · 52% SPA 1-2 BOU · 54% AAR 0-1 SCB · 57% ABH 0-1 ALS · 57% AL- 2-0 ALT · 70% AL- 0-2 AL- · 59% AL- 1-1 ALD · 42% AL- 2-0 AL- · 64% ACM 2-1 FER · 49% AND 2-1 RED · 49% CRY 2-1 189 · 52% LEV 1-2 JAG · 48% LIL 1-1 PLZ · 42% NEC 1-2 OMO · 48% REA 2-1 LYO · 52% SPA 1-2 BOU · 54% AAR 0-1 SCB · 57%
TuringStats
AI consensus
Get the app
Ask multiple AI Forecasts League tables AI board AI poll AI vs Polymarket Check my picks Journal Sign in with Google Get the free app
← Hockey games NHL hub →
NHL Not Started

Montreal Canadiens
vs
Utah Mammoth.

Quick answer

Who will win Montreal Canadiens vs Utah Mammoth?

10 of 10 AI models pick Montreal Canadiens to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 4–2 at 57% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 61% of the time (379 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Montreal Canadiens (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 57% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Montreal Canadiens win 100%

10 / 10 models

Utah Mammoth win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Montreal Canadiens win
4–3
54%
Montreal won the last three listed meetings, including two on home ice, offering a modest matchup signal; Utah's prior win and the lack of current form or roster details make this a close call.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Montreal Canadiens win
4–3
54%
Montreal won three of the last four meetings, including both most recent, and gets home ice. Context is thin and the teams look evenly matched, so the lean is modest and a one-goal game is likely.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Montreal Canadiens win
4–3
56%
Montreal has won three straight in this matchup with strong offensive output. Home ice advantage gives them the edge in another closely contested, high-tempo clash.
04
Grok 4.7
Montreal Canadiens win
4–2
58%
Montreal has taken three of four recent meetings, often by multiple goals, and home ice plus that scoring edge still outweighs thin 2026 form data.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Montreal Canadiens win
4–2
58%
Montreal won three of last four H2H meetings, including 6-2 and 5-3 away, showing consistent edge over Utah. Home venue and recent scoring form support a multi-goal win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Montreal Canadiens win
4–2
58%
Montreal has won 3 of 4 H2H meetings including a 6-2 home rout; home venue and historical dominance over Utah support Canadiens, though current form data is limited.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
Montreal Canadiens win
4–2
58%
Montreal won three of last four meetings including 6-2 at home; home ice and matchup scoring edge support home win.
08
Kimi K3
Montreal Canadiens win
4–3
58%
Montreal has won three of the last four meetings, all high-scoring (4-3, 6-2, 5-3), suggesting their attack matches up well against Utah's defence; home ice adds a modest edge in what profiles as another open, offence-leaning game.
09
GLM 5.3
Montreal Canadiens win
4–2
58%
Montreal won three of the last four meetings with Utah, including both 2025 matchups, and home ice adds an edge; moderate confidence since rosters change and Utah won once in Montreal.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Montreal Canadiens win
4–2
58%
Montreal won three straight vs Utah, including 6-2 at home, showing they exploit Mammoth's defensive lapses; home venue and that attacking matchup support a Canadiens edge despite limited current form data.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    6 models
  • 4–3
    4 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Montreal Canadiens

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 57% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 4.00 vs 2.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask with match data Ask without data (free)

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Montreal Canadiens vs Utah Mammoth in NHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Montreal Canadiens win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Montreal Canadiens vs Utah Mammoth, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

From the blog

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

St. Louis Blues vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Blues at Home
NHL
St. Louis Blues vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Blues at Home

St. Louis Blues vs Montreal Canadiens prediction for their NHL clash: AI panel consensus, key factors, and a predicted score of 3-2 for the home side.

 Washington Capitals vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Capitals
NHL
Washington Capitals vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Capitals

Washington Capitals vs Montreal Canadiens prediction for the NHL clash: our 10-model AI panel unanimously backs Washington with a 4-3 scoreline.

 Montreal Canadiens vs Carolina Hurricanes Prediction: AI Panel Unanimous
NHL
Montreal Canadiens vs Carolina Hurricanes Prediction: AI Panel Unanimous

Montreal Canadiens vs Carolina Hurricanes prediction for the NHL season opener: our 10-model AI panel is unanimous on the winner and the scoreline.

 Pittsburgh Penguins vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Penguins
NHL
Pittsburgh Penguins vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Penguins

Pittsburgh Penguins vs Montreal Canadiens prediction for the NHL season opener: AI models unanimously favor Pittsburgh at home in a high-scoring contest.

 Toronto Maple Leafs vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Leafs
NHL
Toronto Maple Leafs vs Montreal Canadiens Prediction: AI Panel Backs Leafs

Toronto Maple Leafs vs Montreal Canadiens prediction for their NHL clash: our AI panel of 10 models backs Toronto at 60%, with 4-3 the most common score.

 Sparta Praha vs Bournemouth Prediction: AI Panel Backs Away Win
UEFA Europa League
Sparta Praha vs Bournemouth Prediction: AI Panel Backs Away Win

Sparta Praha vs Bournemouth prediction: AI panel unanimously backs Bournemouth in the UEFA Europa League. See the consensus score, confidence and model…

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.

Ask with match data App Store Google Play