AL- 1-0 AL- · 44% KAI 1-2 PAN · 54% AL- 1-1 ALS · 45% JUV 1-0 REN · 56% ARA 0-2 AZA · 57% DIN 1-0 NEC · 54% FER 2-0 TOR · 59% LEC 1-1 SUN · 46% OFI 0-2 BAY · 61% UNI 1-0 HAP · 54% STU 1-2 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53% AL- 1-0 AL- · 44% KAI 1-2 PAN · 54% AL- 1-1 ALS · 45% JUV 1-0 REN · 56% ARA 0-2 AZA · 57% DIN 1-0 NEC · 54% FER 2-0 TOR · 59% LEC 1-1 SUN · 46% OFI 0-2 BAY · 61% UNI 1-0 HAP · 54% STU 1-2 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53%
NHL Oct 20, 2026 · 23:00 Finished

New Jersey Devils
vs
Colorado Avalanche.

Quick answer

Who will win New Jersey Devils vs Colorado Avalanche?

Final score: New Jersey Devils 4–3 Colorado Avalanche. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Colorado Avalanche to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 4–5.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (328 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Colorado Avalanche (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–5 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

New Jersey Devils win 0%

0 / 10 models

Colorado Avalanche win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Colorado Avalanche win
4–5
58%
Colorado has won three of the last five meetings and posted an 8-4 victory in the most recent matchup. New Jersey's home advantage should keep this high-tempo game close, but the Avalanche edge the scoring.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Colorado Avalanche win
4–5
58%
Avalanche have outscored Devils in recent high-event meetings, including a recent road win; Colorado's deep attack edges a close, high-paced contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Colorado Avalanche win
3–4
56%
Colorado's high-tempo offense frequently exploits New Jersey's transition defense, as evidenced by recent high-scoring head-to-head dominance.
04
Grok 4.6
Colorado Avalanche win
2–4
58%
Avalanche dominate recent H2H with high-scoring wins including 8-4 and 5-1; Devils home ice is real but Colorado’s attack still projects the edge in an early-season NHL matchup.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Colorado Avalanche win
4–5
52%
Colorado has won three of the last five meetings, often scoring heavily; New Jersey's home edge is offset by recent defensive lapses in this matchup.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Colorado Avalanche win
4–5
56%
Colorado dominated this H2H recently with multiple blowouts; early-season uncertainty and NJ home ice keep margin tight, but Avalanche talent edge prevails.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Colorado Avalanche win
4–5
62%
Avalanche outscored Devils in 3 of last 5, including two recent blowouts; stronger offensive form.
08
Kimi K3
Colorado Avalanche win
3–5
62%
Colorado's elite offensive depth and recent H2H dominance (8-4, 5-1 wins) outweigh New Jersey's home advantage; Avalanche's transition speed should exploit Devils' defensive inconsistencies in a high-event game.
09
GLM 5.3
Colorado Avalanche win
4–5
56%
Colorado has won three of the last five meetings, including an 8-4 rout; their offense travels well. New Jersey's home edge keeps it close, but the Avalanche attack edges a high-tempo game.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Colorado Avalanche win
3–4
58%
Colorado has won three of the last four meetings, including two decisive wins in New Jersey, showing their offense can overwhelm the Devils' defense. High-scoring matchup favors the Avalanche despite home ice.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 4–5. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–5
    6 models
  • 3–4
    2 models
  • 2–4
    1 model
  • 3–5
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Colorado Avalanche

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.50 vs 4.70

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on New Jersey Devils vs Colorado Avalanche in NHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 5; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Colorado Avalanche win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win New Jersey Devils vs Colorado Avalanche, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.