BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
DEL · Week 6 Oct 2, 2026 · 17:30 Finished

Krefeld Pinguine
vs
ERC Ingolstadt.

Quick answer

Who will win Krefeld Pinguine vs ERC Ingolstadt?

Final score: Krefeld Pinguine 3–1 ERC Ingolstadt. Before kickoff, 9 of 10 AI models pick ERC Ingolstadt to win (90%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 2–4.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward ERC Ingolstadt (9 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Krefeld Pinguine beat ERC Ingolstadt in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Krefeld Pinguine win 10%

1 / 10 models

ERC Ingolstadt win 90%

9 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
ERC Ingolstadt win
4–5
64%
Ingolstadt dominated most recent meetings and offers the stronger historical defensive and scoring profile. Krefeld’s home ice keeps the margin moderate, but the available context favors an away win in a relatively open game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Krefeld Pinguine win
4–3
52%
Historic matchups were high-scoring and close; home ice gives Krefeld a slight edge in an otherwise even early-season DEL clash.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
64%
ERC Ingolstadt brings higher quality and depth across lines, giving them a clear offensive edge over Krefeld.
04
Grok 4.6
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
58%
2026 form is thin; older H2H still tilts to Ingolstadt’s attack. Expect visitors to set the pace and win by two in Krefeld.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
62%
ERC Ingolstadt has dominated recent H2H with multiple multi-goal wins, while Krefeld's home edge is offset by their leaky defense in past meetings.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
58%
Ingolstadt dominated H2H historically (4 of 5 wins), often by multiple goals. Krefeld's one win was narrow. Limited current form data keeps confidence moderate.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
60%
ERC Ingolstadt historically dominates H2H, including recent wins; home form for Krefeld inconsistent.
08
Kimi K3
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
62%
Ingolstadt has dominated this H2H historically and typically brings superior roster depth; Krefeld's home ice keeps it competitive but visitors' offensive edge should prevail.
09
GLM 5.3
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
52%
Ingolstadt won four of the last five H2H meetings, often by multiple goals; despite roster turnover, that edge plus Krefeld's leaky defence tips a moderate away pick.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
ERC Ingolstadt win
2–4
62%
Historical H2H heavily favors Ingolstadt, especially at Krefeld, with high-scoring away wins. Venue advantage insufficient to overcome recent pattern.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 2–4. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–4
    8 models
  • 4–5
    1 model
  • 4–3
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Krefeld Pinguine vs ERC Ingolstadt in DEL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is ERC Ingolstadt win, with vote shares roughly 10% / 90% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Krefeld Pinguine vs ERC Ingolstadt, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors ERC Ingolstadt

90% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.40 vs 4.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.