ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66% ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66%
Premier League · Regular Season - 9 Oct 31, 2026 · 17:30 · UTC Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, London Not Started

Tottenham
vs
Crystal Palace.

Quick answer

Who will win Tottenham vs Crystal Palace?

8 of 10 AI models pick Tottenham to win (80%). The mean predicted score is 1–0 at 48% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Tottenham form Crystal Palace form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Tottenham (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–0 at 48% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Premier League table Where Tottenham and Crystal Palace stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Tottenham win 80%

8 / 10 models

Draw 20%

2 / 10 models

Crystal Palace win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Tottenham win
1–0
47%
Tottenham's home advantage and improving last-five sequence outweigh Palace's recent defensive record, but Spurs have scored only eight times and failed to score four times, favoring a narrow 1-0 win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Tottenham win
2–1
48%
Tottenham at home with mixed form but Palace's poor away record (2W-1D-5L, leaky defense) favors Spurs; recent H2H shows Palace competitive though.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Tottenham win
2–0
56%
Palace have struggled defensively, conceding 19 goals in eight matches. Tottenham's home advantage and defensive solidity should secure a comfortable shutout victory.
04
Grok 4.6
Tottenham win
1–0
42%
Palace's 5L and 19 conceded plus LDWLL form trail Spurs' DLDWW. Both sides often blank, so a late Spurs 1-0 at home fits.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Tottenham win
1–0
42%
Tottenham's home edge and Palace's poor away form, but Spurs struggle to score early and Palace often fail to score; H2H shows tight low-scoring games.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Draw
1–1
42%
Tottenham average just 1 goal per game and Palace have scored at this venue in 3 of last 5 H2H visits; both sides' low output supports a tight draw.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Tottenham win
1–0
62%
Tottenham's home form and late goals edge Palace's defensive struggles; recent H2H mixed but Spurs' venue and clean sheets tilt it.
08
Kimi K3
Tottenham win
1–0
48%
Tottenham's home edge and Palace's league-worst 19 goals conceded tilt it Spurs' way, but Spurs' own 4 scoreless games and Palace's recent H2H wins keep confidence modest; late-goal pattern fits 1-0.
09
GLM 5.3
Tottenham win
2–1
52%
Palace's poor away form and 19 goals conceded aid Spurs, though H2H favors Palace recently; Tottenham's late-goal scoring pattern and home venue justify a narrow 2-1.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Draw
1–1
42%
Both sides misfire (Spurs failed to score 4 times, Palace 4), yet Palace's H2H edge (won 3 of last 5, incl. 3-1 here) and Spurs' late-goal habit suggest a shared, low-scoring draw.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 1–0. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–0
    5 models
  • 2–1
    2 models
  • 1–1
    2 models
  • 2–0
    1 model

Bookmakers vs the AI panel

Bet365 · 1.53 / 4.50 / 5.50
Tottenham Market 62% · AI 80%
Draw Market 21% · AI 20%
Crystal Palace Market 17% · AI 0%

Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 10 AI models picking each result.

Team news

Predicted lineups: Tottenham vs Crystal Palace

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

Tottenham

4-2-3-1 · XI v Chelsea, 24 Oct
R. De Zerbi
22 Omar Marmoush
22 Marmoush
11 M. Tel
11 Tel
Doubt
10 J. Maddison
10 Maddison
20 M. Kudus
20 Kudus
16 S. Tonali
16 Tonali
18 Mateus Fernandes
18 Fernandes
3 A. Robertson
3 Robertson
37 M. van de Ven
37 Ven
6 J. van Hecke
6 Hecke
14 A. Gray
14 Gray
31 A. Kinský
31 Kinský

Crystal Palace

3-4-2-1 · XI v Fulham, 28 Oct
P. Sage
9 E. Nketiah
9 Nketiah
24 D. Osorio
24 Osorio
29 E. Guessand
29 Guessand
8 J. Lerma
8 Lerma
28 C. Doucouré
28 Doucouré
19 W. Hughes
19 Hughes
30 Óscar Mingueza
30 Mingueza
21 H. Ahanor
21 Ahanor
33 B. Chilwell
33 Chilwell
26 C. Richards
26 Richards
1 D. Henderson
1 Henderson

Season data

Premier League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

Tottenham

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
2-3-3
Goals
8-10
Clean sheets
3
Failed to score
4
Best win run
0
Penalties
0/0
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Crystal Palace

3-4-2-1
W-D-L
2-1-5
Goals
9-19
Clean sheets
1
Failed to score
4
Best win run
1
Penalties
0/0
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · Tottenham

  • No player in the competition's top scorers or assisters.

Key players · Crystal Palace

  • D. Kamada 1 G · 3 A · 8 apps

Top scorers · Premier League

  1. 1 E. Haaland Manchester City 9
  2. 2 A. Isak Liverpool 6
  3. 3 João Pedro Chelsea 5
  4. 4 M. Tavernier Bournemouth 5
  5. 5 R. Cherki Manchester City 4
Venue Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, London
Referee Michael Oliver
New at Tottenham M. Mudryk (Chelsea), T. Adarabioyo (Chelsea), Omar Marmoush (Manchester City)
New at Crystal Palace B. Chilwell (Strasbourg), D. Osorio (FC Midtjylland), Q. Timber (Marseille)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Tottenham

80% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 48% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.30 vs 0.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric Tottenham Crystal Palace Expected total Lean
Corners 6.9 3.7 10.6 Under 10.5 51% Ask AI
Yellow cards 2.0 1.9 3.9 Over 3.5 54% Ask AI
Shots 14.3 10.9 25.2 Under 25.5 54% Ask AI
Shots on target 4.6 3.8 8.4 Under 8.5 54% Ask AI

Sample: 10 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 249 graded matches, cards 58% of 250. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Tottenham
#14 · 9 PTS · GD -2
Last 5
W W D L L
9 GF · 8 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Chelsea 0-2 W
  • Coventry 3-1 W
  • Manchester United 1-1 D
  • Aston Villa 2-3 L
  • Liverpool 3-1 L
Team news
R. Bentancur — Red Card M. Mudryk — Ankle Injury W. Odobert — Knee Injury X. Simons — Knee Injury T. Adarabioyo — Calf Injury L. Bergvall — Knee Injury J. Maddison — Groin Injury
Crystal Palace
#17 · 7 PTS · GD -10
Last 5
W L D L L
5 GF · 12 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Fulham 0-1 W
  • Newcastle 0-2 L
  • Beşiktaş 2-2 D
  • Brighton 5-0 L
  • Lyon 3-2 L
Team news
C. Riad — Knee Injury T. Tomiyasu — Calf Injury J. Larsen — Ankle Injury I. Sarr — Groin Injury Q. Timber — Hamstring Injury
— Head to head

Last five meetings.

TOT 2 · D 0 · CRY 3

TOT VS CRY
1-3
AWAY WIN
Mar 5, 2026
CRY VS TOT
0-1
AWAY WIN
Dec 28, 2025
TOT VS CRY
0-2
AWAY WIN
May 11, 2025
CRY VS TOT
1-0
HOME WIN
Oct 27, 2024
TOT VS CRY
3-1
HOME WIN
Mar 2, 2024

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 80% of models side with Tottenham, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 20% — tight Premier League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Tottenham
~80%
implied lean
Draw
~20%
implied lean
Crystal Palace
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 1.70 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Tottenham is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 1.70 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Tottenham win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Tottenham vs Crystal Palace in Premier League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 0; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Tottenham win, with vote shares roughly 80% / 20% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Tottenham vs Crystal Palace, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.