ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66% ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66%
Premier League · Regular Season - 9 Nov 8, 2026 · 14:00 · UTC Stadium of Light, Sunderland Not Started

Sunderland
vs
Chelsea.

Quick answer

Who will win Sunderland vs Chelsea?

10 of 10 AI models pick Chelsea to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 1–2 at 56% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Sunderland form Chelsea form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (751 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Chelsea (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 56% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Premier League table Where Sunderland and Chelsea stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Sunderland win 0%

0 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Chelsea win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Chelsea win
0–2
57%
Sunderland’s 1W-2D-5L record, four scoreless games and 6-14 goal difference point to limited attacking threat, while Chelsea’s João Pedro-led attack offers the clearer quality edge despite mixed recent form.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Chelsea win
1–2
58%
Sunderland struggling badly (LLLLD, 6 goals in 8), Chelsea's attack firing with João Pedro and Rogers in form; Chelsea should control despite road form dip.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Chelsea win
0–2
62%
Sunderland have struggled severely in attack, failing to score in half their games. Chelsea's potent frontline featuring João Pedro should exploit the hosts' defensive vulnerabilities.
04
Grok 4.6
Chelsea win
1–2
48%
Sunderland's 1W-5L and four blanks outweigh last-season H2H wins; Chelsea's Pedro/Rogers attack should edge a leaky but higher-quality side at the Stadium of Light.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Chelsea win
0–2
61%
Sunderland are in terrible form with five straight losses and four scoreless games, while Chelsea's João Pedro and Rogers give them clear attacking edge despite a shaky defence.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Chelsea win
1–2
48%
Sunderland's dire form (LLLLD, 6 goals in 8) vs Chelsea's attacking depth (João Pedro, Palmer). Chelsea concede freely though, so Sunderland likely grab one at home.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Chelsea win
0–2
68%
Sunderland struggling defensively (14 conceded, 4 clean sheets) and failing to score (4 times). Chelsea's attack (17 goals, João Pedro form) and recent away wins over Sunderland support away win.
08
Kimi K3
Chelsea win
1–2
58%
Sunderland's dire form (LLLLD, 1 win in 8) contrasts with Chelsea's superior attack (17 goals). However, Sunderland won both recent H2H meetings 2-1, suggesting they remain competitive at home despite current struggles.
09
GLM 5.3
Chelsea win
2–3
52%
Chelsea's superior attack (João Pedro, Rogers) outweighs Sunderland's poor form (1W in 8), though Sunderland won both recent league meetings and Chelsea leak goals, so a narrow away win fits.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Chelsea win
1–2
48%
Chelsea's attack (17 goals, João Pedro and Rogers firing) outweighs Sunderland's 1W-2D-5L form, though Sunderland's two recent wins over Chelsea and home venue keep this close.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–2
    5 models
  • 0–2
    4 models
  • 2–3
    1 model

Bookmakers vs the AI panel

Bet365 · 4.10 / 3.50 / 1.83
Sunderland Market 23% · AI 0%
Draw Market 26% · AI 0%
Chelsea Market 51% · AI 100%

Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 10 AI models picking each result.

Team news

Predicted lineups: Sunderland vs Chelsea

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

Sunderland

4-2-3-1 · XI v Brentford, 28 Oct
R. Le Bris
57 Timur Tuterov
57 Tuterov
39 M. Fofana
39 Fofana
19 H. Diarra
19 Diarra
37 J. Bi
37 Bi
29 Jules Ahoka
29 Ahoka
7 C. Talbi
7 Talbi
6 D. Methalie
6 Methalie
15 O. Alderete
15 Alderete
4 K. Danso
4 Danso
8 A. Browne
8 Browne
31 M. Ellborg
31 Ellborg

Chelsea

4-3-3 · XI v Liverpool, 28 Oct
Xabi Alonso
17 M. Rogers
17 Rogers
18 D. Welbeck
18 Welbeck
7 Pedro Neto
7 Neto
45 R. Lavia
45 Lavia
25 M. Caicedo
25 Caicedo
14 J. Henderson
14 Henderson
34 Joshua Kofi Acheampong
34 Acheampong
3 W. Fofana
3 Fofana
5 M. Lacroix
5 Lacroix
27 M. Gusto
27 Gusto
39 M. Penders
39 Penders

Season data

Premier League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

Sunderland

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
1-2-5
Goals
6-14
Clean sheets
2
Failed to score
4
Best win run
1
Penalties
1/2
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Chelsea

3-4-2-1
W-D-L
4-1-3
Goals
17-15
Clean sheets
1
Failed to score
2
Best win run
2
Penalties
0/0
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · Sunderland

  • B. Brobbey 3 G · 0 A · 6 apps

Key players · Chelsea

  • João Pedro 5 G · 3 A · 6 apps
  • M. Rogers 4 G · 1 A · 8 apps
  • C. Palmer 2 G · 3 A · 8 apps

Top scorers · Premier League

  1. 1 E. Haaland Manchester City 9
  2. 2 A. Isak Liverpool 6
  3. 3 João Pedro Chelsea 5
  4. 4 M. Tavernier Bournemouth 5
  5. 5 R. Cherki Manchester City 4
Venue Stadium of Light, Sunderland
New at Sunderland M. Fofana (Lyon), K. Danso (Tottenham), J. Angulo (Independiente del Valle)
New at Chelsea E. Martínez (Aston Villa), D. Satpaev (Kairat Almaty), Pep Chavarría (Rayo Vallecano)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Chelsea

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 56% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 0.70 vs 2.10

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric Sunderland Chelsea Expected total Lean
Corners 5.0 6.2 11.2 Under 11.5 56% Ask AI
Yellow cards 1.8 2.3 4.1 Under 4.5 61% Ask AI
Shots 13.6 12.2 25.8 Over 25.5 51% Ask AI
Shots on target 3.5 4.0 7.5 Under 7.5 52% Ask AI

Sample: 10 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 249 graded matches, cards 58% of 250. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Sunderland
#20 · 5 PTS · GD -8
Last 5
W D D L W
6 GF · 6 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Brentford 3-2 W
  • Leeds 0-0 D
  • Lech Poznan 1-1 D
  • Bournemouth 2-0 L
  • Torreense 1-2 W
Team news
S. Adingra — Foot Injury D. Methalie — Yellow Cards H. Diarra — Hamstring Injury R. Mundle — Knee Injury J. Angulo — Off the roster A. Browne — Off the roster M. Ellborg — Off the roster J. Ta Bi — Off the roster C. Talbi — Off the roster R. Mandava — Red Card D. Ballard — Muscle Injury W. Isidor — Injury
Chelsea
#5 · 13 PTS · GD +2
Last 5
D L W W L
8 GF · 7 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Liverpool 1-1 D
  • Tottenham 0-2 L
  • Everton 0-2 W
  • Bournemouth 5-1 W
  • Brentford 3-0 L
Team news
A. Anselmino — Inactive M. Caicedo — Injury E. Emegha — Hamstring Injury W. Fofana — Red Card J. Henderson — Wrist Injury M. Sarr — Transfer negotiations E. Fernandez — Coach's decision M. Palestra — Injury Joao Pedro — Knee Injury J. Gittens — Ankle Injury R. James — Knee Injury P. Chavarria — Injury
— Head to head

Last five meetings.

SUN 2 · D 0 · CHE 0

SUN VS CHE
2-1
HOME WIN
May 24, 2026
CHE VS SUN
1-2
AWAY WIN
Oct 25, 2025

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with Sunderland, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Premier League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Sunderland
~0%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Chelsea
~100%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.80 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.1 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Sunderland is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.80 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Chelsea win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Sunderland vs Chelsea in Premier League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Chelsea win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 0% / 100% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Sunderland vs Chelsea, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.