ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54% SGS 0-2 FCA · 61% HAM 1-2 EIN · 45% ROT 0-2 RBL · 62% SAS 0-2 LAZ · 62% CUA 0-2 GIR · 65% AIK 0-1 IFE · 48% CAL 1-0 EUR · 47% PIN 0-2 ELC · 58% SES 0-2 ESP · 61% CAS 0-2 ALM · 63% ATL 0-2 MIR · 58% CIU 0-1 RAY · 51% ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54% SGS 0-2 FCA · 61% HAM 1-2 EIN · 45% ROT 0-2 RBL · 62% SAS 0-2 LAZ · 62% CUA 0-2 GIR · 65% AIK 0-1 IFE · 48% CAL 1-0 EUR · 47% PIN 0-2 ELC · 58% SES 0-2 ESP · 61% CAS 0-2 ALM · 63% ATL 0-2 MIR · 58% CIU 0-1 RAY · 51%
Eliteserien · Regular Season - 26 Nov 1, 2026 · 16:00 · UTC Not Started

Start
vs
Lillestrom.

Quick answer

Who will win Start vs Lillestrom?

10 of 10 AI models pick Lillestrom to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 0–2 at 59% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Start form Lillestrom form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (679 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Lillestrom (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 0–2 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Eliteserien table Where Start and Lillestrom stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Start win 0%

0 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Lillestrom win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Lillestrom win
0–2
68%
Start have conceded 54 goals and lost both 2026 meetings with Lillestrom, while the visitors arrive 12-3-9 with stronger recent form and seven clean sheets. Lillestrom’s defensive edge supports a controlled away win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Lillestrom win
1–2
58%
Start struggling badly (5W-4D-15L, leaky defense), Lillestrom much stronger form and dominant in recent H2H meetings including this season's clash.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Lillestrom win
0–2
62%
Start have conceded 54 goals in 24 matches and lost three of their last four. Lillestrom's stronger attack and recent 3-1 H2H win support a solid away victory.
04
Grok 4.6
Lillestrom win
1–2
52%
Start’s 26-54 season and recent H2H losses (0-3, 3-0, 3-1) vs Lillestrom’s stronger table and WLDWW form point to an away win; Start still nicks one at home.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Lillestrom win
1–2
58%
Lillestrom are far stronger this season (12W vs 5W) and have won the last three H2Hs convincingly; Start's poor defence (54 conceded) should concede, but their home scoring keeps it close.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Lillestrom win
0–2
52%
Start concede 2.25 per game and have won only 5 of 24; Lillestrom's recent H2H dominance (3-1, 3-0, 3-0) and superior form support a comfortable away win with a clean sheet.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Lillestrom win
1–2
68%
Lillestrom's stronger season form and recent H2H dominance outweigh Start's home edge; both teams score but Lillestrom's firepower prevails.
08
Kimi K3
Lillestrom win
0–2
58%
Lillestrom dominate recent H2H (3 straight wins, 9-1 aggregate) and boast superior form (WLDWW vs WLLLW) plus defensive stability (7 clean sheets vs Start's 3). Start's porous defense (54 conceded) and home struggles suggest a narrow away victory.
09
GLM 5.3
Lillestrom win
0–2
62%
Lillestrom far stronger (12W vs 5W, +2 GD) and won last three H2H by 3-1, 3-0, 3-0; Start concede heavily and rarely score, so 0-2 fits.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Lillestrom win
1–2
55%
Start concede heavily (54 in 24) while Lillestrom's attack, led by Vá and Gulbrandsen, is in form; recent H2H shows Lillestrom dominating this fixture despite Kristiansand venue.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 0–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 0–2
    5 models
  • 1–2
    5 models

Bookmakers vs the AI panel

Bet365 · 2.80 / 3.70 / 2.20
Start Market 33% · AI 0%
Draw Market 25% · AI 0%
Lillestrom Market 42% · AI 100%

Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 10 AI models picking each result.

Team news

Predicted lineups: Start vs Lillestrom

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

Start

· XI v Sandefjord, 25 Oct
A. Karadas
  1. 26 M. Sjøeng
  2. 27 O. Toure
  3. 29 E. Reitan
  4. 6 J. Norheim
  5. 10 S. Mvoué
  6. 20 H. Lorentzen
  7. 9 N. Koutsakos
  8. 5 S. Granheim
  9. 12 D. Dashaev
  10. 18 M. Ugland
  11. 17 J. Cornelius

Lillestrom

4-1-4-1 · XI v Brann, 25 Oct
H. Ødegaard
8 F. Gulbrandsen
8 Gulbrandsen
20 Vá
20 Vá
14 G. Nyheim
14 Nyheim
29 Y. Ibrahimaj
29 Ibrahimaj
22 D. Bassi
22 Bassi
21 F. Ottosson
21 Ottosson
26 Y. Paintsil
26 Paintsil
47 S. Kristiansen
47 Kristiansen
28 R. Gabrielsen
28 Gabrielsen
2 L. Ranger
2 Ranger
12 P. Dahlberg
12 Dahlberg

Season data

Eliteserien numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

Start

5-3-2
W-D-L
5-4-15
Goals
26-54
Clean sheets
3
Failed to score
7
Best win run
1
Penalties
1/3
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Lillestrom

4-1-4-1
W-D-L
12-3-9
Goals
35-33
Clean sheets
7
Failed to score
7
Best win run
3
Penalties
3/4
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · Start

  • No player in the competition's top scorers or assisters.

Key players · Lillestrom

  • Vá 8 G · 5 A · 24 apps
  • F. Gulbrandsen 7 G · 1 A · 22 apps

Top scorers · Eliteserien

  1. 1 P. Christiansen Viking 15
  2. 2 Amin Chiakha Rosenborg 15
  3. 3 A. Helmersen Bodo/Glimt 12
  4. 4 L. Alvheim Kristiansund BK 12
  5. 5 K. Lonebu Molde 12
New at Start M. Dovland (Start), M. Sjøeng (Valerenga), S. A. Granheim (Sogndal)
New at Lillestrom F. Ottosson (IFK Goteborg), D. Bassi (Bodo/Glimt), H. Melland (Aalesund)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Lillestrom

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 0.50 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Start
#16 · 19 PTS · GD -28
Last 5
W L L W W
11 GF · 12 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Sandefjord 1-0 W
  • Molde 6-1 L
  • Ham-Kam 2-4 L
  • Raufoss 1-5 W
  • Brann 2-1 W
Team news
A. F. Gurendal — Thigh Injury J. Meyer — Groin Injury F. Palerud — Injury S. Mvoue — Shoulder Injury J. Torkildsen — Injury J. Norheim — Leg Injury K. Tonnesen — Leg Injury A. Ujkani — Injury E. Schulze — Injury M. Nordal — Illness O. Toure — Red Card F. Lien — Foot Injury
Lillestrom
#6 · 39 PTS · GD +2
Last 5
W L W D D
8 GF · 11 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Brann 3-2 W
  • Real Sociedad 0-6 L
  • Sandefjord 0-2 W
  • Sparta Praha 1-1 D
  • Molde 2-2 D
Team news
F. Elkaer — Knee Injury R. Gabrielsen — Shoulder Injury E. Lucky — Ankle Injury Y. Paintsil — Injury E. B. Garnas — Injury K. Krygard — Injury M. Waehler — Shoulder Injury E. Kitolano — Broken Leg T. Olsen — Leg Injury Y. Ibrahimaj — Yellow Cards U. Jenssen — Injury H. Woxen — Red Card

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with Start, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Eliteserien games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Start
~0%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Lillestrom
~100%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.50 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.8 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Start is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.50 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Lillestrom win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Start vs Lillestrom in Eliteserien? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (0 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Lillestrom win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 0% / 100% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Start vs Lillestrom, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.